On Sunday 06 November 2011 03:55:45 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 06.11.2011 11:40, schrieb David Southwell:
> > On Sunday 06 November 2011 03:33:02 Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> Am 06.11.2011 11:24, schrieb David Southwell:
> >>> Quite happy to do that. Mind you it m
On Sunday 06 November 2011 03:33:02 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 06.11.2011 11:24, schrieb David Southwell:
> > Quite happy to do that. Mind you it may be possible to ask in a way that
> > does not demonstrate a determination, fequently expressed on this list,
> > to hammer into
On Sunday 06 November 2011 02:54:42 Reindl Harald wrote:
> would you please be so gently only reply to the list and not
> additionally to the post you are answering? your arguments
> are not smart enough that there is a need get them all twice
Quite happy to do that. Mind you it may be possible to
On Sunday 06 November 2011 02:43:31 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 06.11.2011 10:34, schrieb David Southwell:
> > That is plain B**t. I am making a constructive contribution which, if
> > some thought and consideration were given to it, might substantially
> > improve Postfix
On Sunday 06 November 2011 02:29:30 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 06.11.2011 10:22, schrieb David Southwell:
> > IMHO Postfix needs to add to its goals a determination to make
> > configuration a breeze rather than a challenge. That means diagnostic
> > and corrective parsers
On Sunday 06 November 2011 01:46:35 lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote:
> Zitat von David Southwell :
> > On Saturday 05 November 2011 06:42:12 Simon Brereton wrote:
> >> On 5 November 2011 08:21, David Southwell wrote:
> >> > On Saturday 05 November 2011 05:13:22 Wiet
On Saturday 05 November 2011 22:40:03 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of David Southwell
> > Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:41 AM
> > To: po
Just to add weight to my last posting - the use of a " " as a critical symbol
is really quite idiotic. What cannot be seen should never be that significant!
r 2011 09:03:18 David Southwell wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 November 2011 06:42:12 Simon Brereton wrote:
> > > On 5 November 2011 08:21, David Southwell
>
> > > wrote:
> snip
>
> > > > Clearly postfix is need of an intelligent parser that will to
> &g
On Saturday 05 November 2011 06:42:12 Simon Brereton wrote:
> On 5 November 2011 08:21, David Southwell wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 November 2011 05:13:22 Wietse Venema wrote:
> >> David Southwell:
> >> > Did you read the original posting and the reply from Kamil.
On Saturday 05 November 2011 05:13:22 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> > Did you read the original posting and the reply from Kamil. He spotted
> > the primary cause. It was he who spotted the extra " " before
> > policyd-spf in master.cf which was in t
On Saturday 05 November 2011 04:33:27 David Southwell wrote:
> On Saturday 05 November 2011 04:13:17 Kamil Raczyński wrote:
> > On 2011-11-05 11:27, David Southwell wrote:
> > > Lets assume that is the case. If so can anyone please help me
> >
> >
On Saturday 05 November 2011 04:57:26 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> > > Yes, because of a master.cf configuration error.
> >
> > Lets assume that is the case. If so can anyone please help me identify
> > the
>
> Have you run lsof or netstat
On Saturday 05 November 2011 04:13:17 Kamil Raczyński wrote:
> On 2011-11-05 11:27, David Southwell wrote:
> > Lets assume that is the case. If so can anyone please help me
>
> identify the
>
> > error?
>
> [...]
>
> > policyd-spf unix - n
On Friday 04 November 2011 14:07:36 Wietse Venema wrote:
> Benny Pedersen:
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 07:45:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > > policyd-spf unix - n n - 0 spawn
> > >
> > > user=nobody argv=/usr
On Friday 04 November 2011 10:24:54 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> > On Friday 04 November 2011 09:24:40 Kris Deugau wrote:
> > > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > But still got the following errors when the lines in main.cf were
> >
> > unchecked
On Friday 04 November 2011 10:24:54 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> > On Friday 04 November 2011 09:24:40 Kris Deugau wrote:
> > > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > But still got the following errors when the lines in main.cf were
> >
> > unchecked
On Friday 04 November 2011 10:24:54 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> > On Friday 04 November 2011 09:24:40 Kris Deugau wrote:
> > > David Southwell wrote:
> > > > But still got the following errors when the lines in main.cf were
> >
> > unchecked
On Friday 04 November 2011 09:24:40 Kris Deugau wrote:
> David Southwell wrote:
> > But still got the following errors when the lines in main.cf were
unchecked:
> [snip]
>
> > Nov 4 07:37:50 dns1 postfix/smtpd[26676]: warning: connect to
> > private/policyd-spf: Conne
On Friday 04 November 2011 08:01:19 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>
> > On Friday 04 November 2011 07:23:33 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > David Southwell:
> > > > The following lines appear in master.cf
On Friday 04 November 2011 08:01:19 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>
> > On Friday 04 November 2011 07:23:33 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > David Southwell:
> > > > The following lines appear in master.cf
On Friday 04 November 2011 08:01:19 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
>
> > On Friday 04 November 2011 07:23:33 Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > David Southwell:
> > > > The following lines appear in master.cf
On Friday 04 November 2011 07:23:33 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> > The following lines appear in master.cf:
> > spf-policy unix - n n - 0 spawn
>
> This says: spf-policy
>
> > If the following lines appear in main.cf
&g
On Friday 04 November 2011 07:23:33 Wietse Venema wrote:
> David Southwell:
> > The following lines appear in master.cf:
> > spf-policy unix - n n - 0 spawn
>
> This says: spf-policy
>
> > If the following lines appear in main.cf
&g
System freebsd 8
Cannot get spf working with the server.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Here is the information:
The following lines appear in master.cf:
# Applied #1 postfix refereshed ok
spf-policy unix - n n - 0 spawn
user=nobody argv=/usr/loca
On Thursday 03 November 2011 14:03:21 Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 03.11.2011 21:57, schrieb David Southwell:
> > It actually looks as though goddady are saying the domain renewal fee has
> > not been paid.. maybe that is a misinterpretation but that was my
> > reading of Godaddy
On Thursday 03 November 2011 12:11:13 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On 11/03/2011 08:53 AM, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Just trying to look at www.open-spf.org for some info about a problem and
> > found their server is down. Godaddy says the domain na
Hi
Just trying to look at www.open-spf.org for some info about a problem and
found their server is down. Godaddy says the domain name has not been
renewed!!
David
Thank you Brian
The grey listing is now working but I am still getting problems with spf
When the following lines are active
check_policy_service unix:private/policyd-spf
policyd-spf_time_limit = 3600
Here is an example of maillog error reports:
Nov 3 10:57:51 dns1 postfix/smtpd[20636
Hi I am just trying to run policyd-spf and postgrey. However whatever I do I
seem to get errors of the form:
[root@dns1 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-policyd-spf-perl]# postfix reload
postfix: fatal: /usr/local/etc/postfix/main.cf, line 227: missing '=' after
attribute name: "check_policy_service uni
How do I set an unlimited outgoing email attachment size?
thanks in advance
david
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 08:57:09AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> > On 21-Sep-2009, at 08:47, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >> It may be useful to highlight for review parameter names that are not
> >> known to "postconf -d" (i.e. not built-in). Also any parameters defined
> >> more than once (the last value
Hi
Is there an independent main.cf format checking tool that will identify any
errors in the file? Even better one that analyses the main.cf and points out
weaknesses would be even more welcome!!!
David
33 matches
Mail list logo
