RE: Odd DNS issue requiring reboot.

:06PM -0400, Dave Lewis - Mailinglist wrote: > So what seems to be happening Is that if something causes a dns issue > postfix stops sending mail, and outgoing mail queues with things like this. > > (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=gmail.com > type=MX: Host

Odd DNS issue requiring reboot.

re a fix ? is it really a postfix issue ? or is it Ubuntu that is having the issue ?I get DNS is important, but things can happen, and I would expect that things would start functioning normally and not require a reboot to "clear" the problem. Thanks for any thing you can provide. Dave

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

Thanks Viktor, that looks good. regards Dave On 01/09/2020 08:38, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:51:42AM +0100, dave wrote: Maybe I need to clarify a few things. My email server is not in my home network. My raspberry is, and it gets random IPs as sometimes it has to go

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

Thanks, SASL looks the best way. Still not sure why we're talking relaying... ;-) regards Dave On 31/08/2020 17:55, Bill Cole wrote: On 31 Aug 2020, at 4:51, dave wrote: Mail to my own domains is not permitted by default. This email from raspberry is sent to my own domain (the on

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

(the one I'm using on this list) and it fails the sender address domain not found and FQDN tests. There is no relaying needed. thanks Dave On 31/08/2020 00:05, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:54:19PM +0100, dave wrote: That would be great if it works. You mean that wou

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

That would be great if it works. It may be easy to forge, but it can be harder to guess depending on what name I choose? But you both mention relay - is that in the loose sense of the word? I don't need to relay it do I? Just permit? thanks Dave On 30/08/2020 23:31, Jaroslaw Rafa

Re: mynetworks equivalent for sender address

Great, thanks. Do I need the "enabling DSASL authion postfix client section, or configure sender dependent SASL. And do I need to use relayhosts? thanks Dave On 30/08/2020 18:24, Nick wrote: On 2020-08-30 18:08 BST, dave wrote: So what I'm looking for is the easiest way of acce

mynetworks equivalent for sender address

sort of stuff?) A simple equivalent of mynetworks, but for a from address rather than an IP/network would be ideal. Thanks in advance for any suggestions. regards Dave

Re: The historical roots of our computer terms

On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 15:27:21 -0400 "vi...@vheuser.com" wrote: > Enough already. +1 d -- Affectionate tactile stimulation is a primary need, a need which must be satisfied if the infant is to develop as a healthy human being. And what is a healthy human being? One who is able to love, to work,

Re: The historical roots of our computer terms

On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 19:12:08 +0200 Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: > long > before any racial conflict was taking place. when was that? d -- Affectionate tactile stimulation is a primary need, a need which must be satisfied if the infant is to develop as a healthy human being. And what is a healthy huma

Re: DMARC usage opinion

- On Dec 17, 2019, at 12:40 PM, Dominic Raferd domi...@timedicer.co.uk wrote: > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 17:35, Dave Goodrich > wrote: >> >> - On Dec 17, 2019, at 8:14 AM, Roberto Carna >> wrote: >> >> Dear, I have a Postfix server and I hav

Re: DMARC usage opinion

other countries are using our email addresses, I have not the faintest idea what I can do about it. I am having trouble understanding the purpose of the reports I receive, I can't do anything with the information. And this digresses into a DMARC discussion, not a Postfix discussion. DAve

postscreen_whitelist_interfaces behind proxy

sting disabled. Something like: postscreen_whitelist_interfaces = !:2525 static:all I realize it doesn't have much use without proxy and it is not usual setup.. But in my case, it would save me from configuring several IPs on several machines. So, just a suggestion. Thanks, Dave -- View this message in

Re: Postscreen_access_list not working

smtpd_client_message_rate_limit=0 -o smtpd_client_new_tls_session_rate_limit=0 Are the *_limit=0 lines above correct for overriding the main.cf values? Thanks, Dave On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:50 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 02:25:19PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: >> Is there somet

Re: Postscreen_access_list not working

ss_list and the smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions that could bypass dnsbl and rate limiting for SASL authenticated senders? On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Dave Jones: >> I have to be overlooking something here but I have tripple >> checked everything and read the documentat

Postscreen_access_list not working

having to add off-network CIDRs to $mynetworks temporarily to bypass dnsbl checks. postfix-3.0.5-1.el6.x86_64 Thanks, Dave

Re: SPF

- Original Message - > From: "Noel Jones" > To: postfix-users@postfix.org > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 11:51:53 AM > Subject: Re: SPF > > On 2/4/2016 9:27 AM, Dave Goodrich wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > May I ask a question

SPF

Hello all, May I ask a question about SPF failure? It is not Postfix specific though our server is running Postifx. You folks just happen to be the group I trust the most for a decent answer. Thanks, Dave Goodrich Webmaster City of Greenfield, Indiana 317-477-4309

RE: combined backup and primary MX config

Sorry for the late reply Thanks for the info, I appreciate it ! Dave. -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 12:15 PM To: Postfix users Subject: Re: combined backup and

combined backup and primary MX config

using a regular primary config and including relay_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/relaydomains maximal_queue_lifetime = 30d for the backup mx's ? I look forward to any comments/suggestions. Tks, Dave

Re: postfix sending spam

Quoting Wietse Venema : Dave Stevens: I suspected a compromised wordpress install and ran updates on every aspect of wordpress that I can think of. I have no reason now to think that WP is responsible for the ongoing spamming. I don't have any more good ideas,a dn am reproducing belo

postfix sending spam

o use email really need it. Dave ps this report was run with postfix not running - Postfix Begin 3 *Fatal: General fatal 1 *Warning: Error writing queue file 34 SASL authentication failed 58 Miscellaneous war

Multiple Content Filters

smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions= -o syslog_name=postfix/dkimmilter -o content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10032 # -o content_filter=smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025 Thanks, DAve Dave Goodrich Webmaster City of Greenfield, Indiana 317-477-4309

Postfix config check command

failure" errors in the logs and reject everything. It would be beneficial to check for syntax problems in config files (like spamassassin --lint returning a non-zero code) so a bad config doesn't get applied to a cluster of mail servers. Thanks, Dave

Re: Add header based on number of recipients

smtpd_data_restrictions fixed my issue and I see the header now. Thank you. On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Dave Jones: > > Feb 19 16:55:12 smtp1 postfwd[27034]: [RULES] rule=4, id=RCPTCNT1, > > queue=C2B7433E7CE, client=unknown[172.27.0.203], sender=<

Re: Add header based on number of recipients

NT1, action=PREPEND X-Rcpt-Count: test I have tried both postfwd1 and postfwd2 and have their required Perl packages. Any users of postfwd have any ideas why this header doesn't get added? I have tracked down messages in the logs to mailboxes I have access to and the header is not in present. I have tested this on multiple Postfix servers and get the same results. Dave

Re: Add header based on number of recipients

Thank you for the postfwd link. Not sure why I didn't find this during my research. I guess I didn't have the right Google keywords. :) On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Dave Jones: > > I need to be able to relay outbound for this customer of ours as

Re: Add header based on number of recipients

stfix Policy Servers or daemons able > to provide such kind of feature, like the X-Itools ELSE project with its > RTAAM engine for example. > > > > Le 04/02/2015 14:34, Dave Jones a écrit : > > I have a sneaky spammer that is using compromised accounts of a mail >> s

Add header based on number of recipients

on RBLs. Also the original mail server is an Exchange server that does not add the X-Originating-IP or Received headers of the sender so I could key off of that in SA. Thanks, Dave

Re: Forwarding mail to hotmail.com

I filter mail for a lot of mailboxes where I normally see 20+ messages from account-security-nore...@account.microsoft.com per day. The last one I see is on 10/1/14 at 13:25 GMT-5 (Central US). On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > [ Bcc to someone at Microsoft who may be abl

Re: Blocked via Spamhaus

>Am 04.09.2014 um 18:23 schrieb LuKreme: >> >>dwl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[2;3]*-3 >>swl.spamhaus.org=127.0.2.[12;13]*-3 >AFAIR someone posted a few months ago that those lists are empty. Has that >changed? Nope. They are still empty. I just checked my fresh data feed and they only have

Re: bounce requeuing for a specific domain

>Dave Jones: >> I have read the documentation and searched the web without any success. >> >> Is it possible to setup a specific destination domain to not bounce >> but always tempfail/requeue? >You could configure a dedicated SMTP client in master.cf with "

bounce requeuing for a specific domain

I have read the documentation and searched the web without any success. Is it possible to setup a specific destination domain to not bounce but always tempfail/requeue? AOL bounces these back to our senders but I would like for them to stay in the queue so I can resend them later. If they would

Re: Address verification ONLY on startup (i.e., "pinging" external addresses)

ble which is no different than for a good email address. I have tried setting: address_verify_relayhost= in the main.cf, but when I monitor the log after running the sendmail -bv command, I still see the mail being relayed through the relay server. Thanks again. Dave > Pfft! > > Of

Re: Address verification ONLY on startup (i.e., "pinging" external addresses)

Pfft! Of course! Thanks! D. > On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 02:00:36PM -0500, d...@powerstandards.com wrote: > >> What I'd like to do is check on a postfix start or reload that these few >> addresses are reachable *before* I do things like set up firewalls, >> etc., >> then stop sending out probes at

Address verification ONLY on startup (i.e., "pinging" external addresses)

TION_README and can't quite figure out what is even relevant to my problem, and know that that may not even be the best route for "pinging". What would be the most common way to do this? It's perfectly possible I'm missing something painfully obvious here. Note: a relay_host is usually involved. Thanks, Dave

"Configuring header/body checks... from outside users only" && main.cf

, or behaviour of, (postfix's) sendmail? Thanks, Dave Network settings: $ uname -a Linux P1234567 2.6.37_PQube_Bob+ #152 PREEMPT Thu Jan 16 14:47:05 PST 2014 armv5tejl GNU/Linux $ ip addr 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00

Re: "spontaneous" re-appearance of .db (and source text!) files

Hi Wietse, This is a syslog snapshot of the situation a few seconds earlier: * postmap processes dying because of a missing file (remember, there is no mention of the db file in the current configuration) * other postmap processes creating/populating the db file "N" times, ergo the duplicate ent

Re: "spontaneous" re-appearance of .db (and source text!) files

e not gotten to "tuning" yet. I am going for a very lean yet VERY secure implementation which can nevertheless handle gmail, etc. (Note: I am a C programmer, not an admin. This is all kind of foreign to me.) Thanks again! Dave > d...@powerstandards.com: >> Feb 14 08:47:1

"spontaneous" re-appearance of .db (and source text!) files

ybody ever seen this before? I have googled it, but to no avail. Thanks, Dave This shows the files re-appearing, a log watch while attempting to deliver mail, and the build info for postmap. 1) * The db file AND text file exist and are removed $ ls -l sender_access2* -rw-r--r--1 root root

SERVFAIL Errors

Hi All Any ideas on how I can sort sort below? Feb 12 10:24:48 mail postfix/smtpd[17207]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[196.14.170.132]: 450 4.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: SPF-Result=medscheme.co.za: 'SERVFAIL' error on DNS 'MX' lookup of 'cluster1a.sa.messagelabs.com'; from= to= proto=

Re: incoming mail errors

AM, Dave Johnsom wrote: > > Hi All > > > > This machine s a new install and I am getting the following error > > > > Nov 20 19:43:13 mail postfix/smtpd[6387]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > > ..x[209.97.202.1]: 554 5.7.1 > <mailto:p

incoming mail errors

Hi All This machine s a new install and I am getting the following error Nov 20 19:43:13 mail postfix/smtpd[6387]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from ..x[209.97.202.1]: 554 5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Greylisting in effect, sending server blacklisted; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo= Any

Re: Reverse DNS unknown

> Dave Jones: > > >On 9/16/2013 5:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > >> > > >> Received: from mail02.corp.ena.net (unknown [96.4.3.90]) > > >> by mr11.mail.ena.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C091480688 > > >> for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013

Re: Reverse DNS unknown

>On 9/16/2013 5:41 PM, Dave Jones wrote: >> >> Received: from mail02.corp.ena.net (unknown [96.4.3.90]) >> by mr11.mail.ena.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C091480688 >> for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:04:46 -0500 (CDT) >> >> My forward DNS lookup for t

Reverse DNS unknown

this way for years. I didn't think the "unknown" above is dependent on FCRDNS. Thanks in advance, Dave

RE: Question about forwarding and SPAM checking

s but maybe something I'm writing will spark an idea of a solution from the experts out there.. Dave From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Dave Lewis - Mailinglist Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 4:10 PM To:

Question about forwarding and SPAM checking

that was tagged as SPAM and deposited in the SPAM folder ? Thanks, Dave

FW: Looking for howto/wiki for spam/av help

e biggest part is the per user SPAM folder. And While I'm at it what are people's opinions on Amavisd? Can anyone suggest any documentation that could help me ? Thanks, Dave

Re: Plesk or equivalent to manage Postfix ?

t;http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/> I use Virtualmin. It automates the easy cases and provides a GUI. It's GPL. I especially like that it is uniform from one platform to another saving me part of the learning curve. Dave -- It is told that such are

Re: postfix not running and not startable

Quoting lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Zitat von Dave Stevens : I have a vps running ubuntu 10.04LTS on an openVZ platform. On top of that I inst

postfix not running and not startable

00:20 uucp srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 2011-11-09 16:06 verify srw-rw-rw- 1 postfix postfix 0 2011-11-09 16:06 virtual and again don't understand what the significance of these errors is, or, more to the point, what to do to either diagnose or fix the problem. Ideas?? Dave -- It is to

User not Logged in

Hi All I am getting the following error on a new installation : host smtphost.x.com[xxx.xxx.xx] said: 553 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: not logged in (in reply to RCPT TO command) : host smtphost.x.com[..] said: 553 5.7.1 : Sender address rejected: not logged i

Re: Transport to multiple destinations

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Dave Jones: >> I am converting some sendmail boxes to postfix and can't find any >> information about multiple destinations (preferably primary / >> secondary). > > If it is not documented, then it is not imp

Transport to multiple destinations

erver when the primary is down. I need this same functionality in postfix so I can provide a backupmx or mailbag if the primary link or mailserver goes down. Thanks, Dave

Postfix relay to local MTA on different port or IP

age. Thanks for the help. Dave

Re: Updating SSL cert

Yes, that was my problem. I was confusing postfix with dovecot. It is now updated and functioning normally. Thanks for your help. Regards, Dave On 23/12/10 12:49 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:43:44PM -0500, Dave Filchak wrote: > >> Well ... OK then: sor

Re: Updating SSL cert

these are likely the files that are being read because the email address in these files are the email address of the person who was administering the server, Again, please bear with me as I am just working my way through the learning curve. Dave On 23/12/10 12:20 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote

Updating SSL cert

direct me as to troubleshootong and then repairing this problem. TIA Dave

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

On 12/16/2010 3:00 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Dave Brodin: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] Many thanks to Scott Lambert for what I believe to be the solution to my load problem. It was nsswitch.conf which still had all its default settings when I began this troubleshooting. I

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

...@bluemarble.net -t dbro...@bluemarble.net localhost:25 500 real0m0.358s user0m0.063s sys 0m0.135s Can't wait to see how it handles under a real mail load once I can schedule the migration from the current server. Thanks again for all the help. Dave Brodin On 12/16/2010 10:46 AM, W

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

make sure nothing in my current config is messing it up. I can see what my numbers look like then. Dave Brodin On 12/15/2010 5:43 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Victor Duchovni: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 01:37:48PM -0500, Dave Brodin wrote: I ran the following command: time /usr/local/bin/smtp-sourc

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

, so I am filling in. Unfortunately, I am not proficient with commands to analyze disk and memory performance. I ran iostat, but I'm not sure how to interpret the results. On 12/9/2010 3:39 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:59:56PM -0500, Dave Brodin wrote: Old s

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

On 12/9/2010 4:55 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: Wietse Venema put forth on 12/9/2010 2:52 PM: Dave Brodin: Thank you very much for the info. I'm really filling in because our main system administrator's last day is tomorrow, unfortunately. I guess it's 8.2-PRERELEASE (not sure ho

Re: Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

On 12/9/2010 3:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Dave Brodin: We are an ISP and have Postfix running on FreeBSD. Currently, we are using postfix 2.4.10 on FreeBSD 4.7. Both are older versions because several years ago we tried to upgrade FreeBSD to 6.0 and had some bizarre results. We just tried

Load issues with Postfix on FreeBSD

n - - pipe # flags=FR user=list argv=/usr/lib/mailman/bin/postfix-to-mailman.py # ${nexthop} ${user} -- Dave Brodin Network Operations Manager Smithville Digital This message may contain information that is confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, use and

Re: Postfix ignoring "", won't do fingerprint checking

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 5/10/2010 12:52 PM, Dave O'Larte wrote: >> >> Regarding using the right main.cf <http://main.cf>: >> I've only installed a single Postfix instance, and changes I make to >> main.cf <http://main.c

Re: Postfix ignoring "", won't do fingerprint checking

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Larry Stone wrote: > > Please don't top post in this group. Interleaving it is then. > > On Mon, 10 May 2010, Dave O'Larte wrote: > >> --main.cf non-default parameters-- >> smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_tls_clien

Re: Postfix ignoring "", won't do fingerprint checking

11:01 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 5/10/2010 10:30 AM, Dave O'Larte wrote: > >> I'm trying to enable TLS client fingerprint checking on Postfix - that >> is, I want Postfix, acting as a server, to check the fingerprint of >> clients trying to connect against a table

Postfix ignoring "", won't do fingerprint checking

stems running the same version of Postfix, so obviously I'm doing something wrong. Anyone know of a reason Postfix would ignore "smtpd_client_restrictions"? As this is the first time I've ever tried to post a Postfix question, please don't hesitate to let me know if there's a better way to pPost such a newb question ... Dave

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

> Is the MTU<->buffer-size mismatch in the SMTP client or the milter? An upgrade to clamav-milter is being carried out tonight during scheduled downtime so I will investigate at this time and post to the list accordingly. Dave Green

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

submitted with large attachments and throughput for such mail is similar to the results I obtained using smtp-source. My sincerest of thanks for providing both a solution and information about OpenBSD semantics of which I was not aware. Kind regards, Dave Green

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

s via pickup. As far as I can tell cleanup goes through the same process each time independent of how mail is presented to it. -- Dave Green

Re: Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

e NAGLE delays > of a tenth of a second or so, and that adds up with large messages. Interesting, I was not aware of this. -- Dave Green

Cleanup is slow for mail received by SMTP

ay via STMP and it's absence via pickup. postconf -n, master.cf, a log of cleanup -v for mail received by SMTP and the test attachment used are available from http://sigmasys.co.uk/postfix/ Kind regards, Dave Green /var/log/maillog Mar 21 20:06:52 imp postfix/smtpd[29129]: connect from

Cant send mail

Hi all I have set up a new box, but are having problems sending mail. Any help would be appreciated I have posted all the code to: http://pastebin.com/m9d7f56d Regards

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Stan Hoeppner: >> Dave T?ht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM: >> >> > I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too. >> >> That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig an

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

Stan Hoeppner writes: > Dave Täht put forth on 10/7/2009 2:40 PM: > >> I imagine you all were big fans of NETBUI and IPX/SPX too. > > That's a bit like comparing a German Shepherd and a Poodle to a Pig and > a Giraffe. IPv4/IPv6 share the same architecture (same sp

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Dave T?ht: >> d...@teklibre.org (Dave T?ht) writes: >> >> One unanswered question from this series of emails: >> >> >> Dave Taht: >> > >> > Would you take a patch that would let a craz

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

Stan Hoeppner writes: > Dave Täht put forth on 10/6/2009 10:02 AM: >> d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes: >> >> One unanswered question from this series of emails: >> >>>> Dave Taht: >>> Would you take a patch that would let a crazed admin

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes: One unanswered question from this series of emails: >> Dave Taht: > > Would you take a patch that would let a crazed administrator disable > *sending* mail on different protocols? > > The simplest version would imp

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Dave T?ht: >> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: >> >> > Dave Taht: >> >> So what I think I want to do is setup fallback relaying as follows: >> >> >> >> MX 5 mylaptop

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Dave T?ht: >> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: >> >> > Dave Taht: >> >> So what I think I want to do is setup fallback relaying as follows: >> >> >> >> MX 5 mylaptop

Re: ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) writes: > Dave Taht: >> So what I think I want to do is setup fallback relaying as follows: >> >> MX 5 mylaptop.example.org # if my laptop's up send mail there >> MX 10 mytinyarmbox.example.org # if not, try my arm box

ipv6 and smart(er) relaying

n the background, rather than via a cron job, is a good idea, and 2) I have to run my own mail servers anyway, so why not skip that step? And 3) It's kind of fun.) If anyone would like to dink with this little arm box, email me privately, I'll set you up an account. -- Dave Taht http://

postfix, amavisd-new, and dkim?

he options be: v="DKIM1"; h="sha256;sha1"; k=rsa; t=s; p=Base64Key; I'm hoping i'm getting these settings right. I generated the private key with openssl genrsa with a keysize of 1024 did i have to specify an algorithm? Thanks. Dave.

RE: Postfix DKIM

Hi, I'd recommend either dkimproxy if your using a proxy setup or amavisd-new if you've already got amavisd going that way might be easier. Hth Dave. -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Evan

chaining filters

has this combo working i'd like to hear about it. Thanks. Dave.

latest postfix vs. postfix 2.3 package?

ide if i should do an upgrade. Thanks. Dave.

Checking external mail

mail server and have it put the message through it's various checks? Thanks. Dave. Delivered-To: dave.meh...@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.6.16 with SMTP id 16cs108866anf; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.42.83 with SMTP id r19mr8187638qae.35.1252161766037;

Re: rbl checks, best place + ipv6?

Mark Martinec writes: > On Sunday August 23 2009 04:10:06 Dave Täht wrote: >> What I found after fighting with an exchange server that what seems to >> work best is assigning my first mx host to be ipv6 only, and my fallback >> to be a mx ipv6 and ipv4 host. > > My cho

Re: rbl checks, best place + ipv6?

mouss writes: > Dave a écrit : >> Hello, >> I'm running postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin. Currently in my >> postfix smtpd_recipient_restrictions right at the end last thing i have some >> rbl checks. I'm wondering if that's the best plac

rbl checks, best place

estions welcome. Thanks. Dave.

RE: postfix not rejecting single nonexistent user

Hello, Thanks. The mail is rejected, but it's generating bounce messages, whereas mail to unknown users that smtpd rejects doesn't get queued at all, mail addressed to mailman seems to start through the queue rather than be initially rejected. Thanks. Dave. -Origin

postfix not rejecting single nonexistent user

a postconf -n output, i've been over this for four days now and it's eluding me, it's probably simple but now frustrated and can't see it. Help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. address_verify_map = btree:/var/spool/postfix/verified_senders alias_database = hash:/etc/pos

Re: IPv6 and smarter relaying

d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes: Half solved! > I have setup my laptop (as a test) to send out and respond to ipv6 mail, > and not listen on the ipv4 ports at all. I tunnel my laptop out to > have a static ipv6 address, and have mx records (for the teklibre.org > domain)

IPv6 and smarter relaying

host which has both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses because I have relayhost set ? -- Dave Taht http://the-edge.blogspot.com

restrictions, postgrey, and spamassassin

ers, but am not sure which file to alter. These last two might be off topic responses private if it is felt necessary. Any suggestions appreciated. Here's a postconf -n. Thanks. Dave. address_verify_map = btree:/var/spool/postfix/verified_senders alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/a

RE: postfix and amavisd-new on CentOS

Hi, Thanks for your reply. I have solved the problem. I commented out receive_override_options in main.cf and that did it. Thanks. Dave. -Original Message- From: Noel Jones [mailto:njo...@megan.vbhcs.org] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:36 PM To: dave.meh...@gmail.com

postfix and amavisd-new on CentOS

_filter, restart postfix and all is well. Thanks. Dave.

  1   2   >