On 11/23/20 10:44 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 23.11.2020 o godz. 10:18:39 D'Arcy Cain pisze:
I used to have a client who was not getting emails from one of his
friends. Turned out that the friend's client/MUA was not adding the
message ID.
Doesn't Postfix automatically
On 11/23/20 9:49 AM, maciejm wrote:
Hi
Thanks for replay I found "RFC 822 Message-ID is not required"
Probably "problem" is in configurations in some clients.
I used to have a client who was not getting emails from one of his friends.
Turned out that the friend's client/MUA was not adding the
On 2020-06-08 09:54, vi...@vheuser.com wrote:
> PS Red-list offends native Americans and Green-list offends
> environmentalists.
And yellow and brown are out. How about mauve and teal?
Or, maybe we get back to this issue after solving world hunger and
homelessness.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System
On 2019-11-26 7:56 a.m., Wesley Peng wrote:
> If using plain port 25, the messages are not secure enough for traffic.
> From what I know there is a technology calling Traffic hijacking.
What makes one port number more or less secure than another? Security
is based on what goes over the port, not
On 2018-06-20 10:43 AM, Paul Martin wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to send 5 messages per second with postfix.
>
> How can I do that with postfix ?
Type really, really fast?
Or, clarify your question. I can think of at least two things that you
are trying to do;
1. Accept all messages but thr
On 01/07/2018 05:25 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Jan 7, 2018, at 6:09 PM, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
>>
>> Absolutely. There are only two things that an MTA should do with email,
>> deliver it or bounce it. Silently dropping is plain wrong.
>
> There&#
On 01/07/2018 01:15 PM, Yuval Levy wrote:
> would detract from the main issue which is "silently discarded emails,"
> I behavior that in my view is plain wrong and threatens the usefulness
> of email more than a few false positive spam messages.
Absolutely. There are only two things that an MTA s
On 2017-05-25 03:20 PM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
Right from the Telus website :
--
"Clear the Requires a secure connection (SSL) check box"
"Authenticate using: Clear text"
http://business.telus.com/en/business/support/global/how-to/how-to-set-up-your-email-on-any-computer
---
Se
On 2017-05-24 11:11 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
I still don't understand why I accepted the email anyway. The user
didn't exist.
Because relay recipients are blocked only when relay_recipient_maps
lists the 'valid' recipients; this is not a required setting.
So would this setting make sense?
r
On 2017-05-24 09:53 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
D'Arcy Cain:
On 2017-05-24 09:30 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
D'Arcy Cain skrev den 2017-05-24 15:25:
The following is in my logs.
provide postconf -n to get more help
I knew I forgot something.
Postfix before 3.0 by default accepts
On 2017-05-24 09:30 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
D'Arcy Cain skrev den 2017-05-24 15:25:
The following is in my logs.
provide postconf -n to get more help
I knew I forgot something.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da.
The following is in my logs. I have no server called nan.vex.net and no
user called aida.wanda. I don't see anything in main.cf that looks like
a wild card entry. Can anyone suggest why I would be accepting this
message in the first place? I really don't want to back-scatter.
May 22 20:11:59 s
On 2017-04-17 12:45 PM, Koszta Dániel wrote:
That's fine, but in this case the "sensible" option would be to _drop_
the mail, instead of trying to deliver it elsewhere.
Not unless you run a toy system for your own use. As an email provider
I promise my users that there are only two options -
On 2017-03-21 12:46 PM, Carlo Poggiarelli wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
That's exactly what I need... Send a single copy of that message to each of
those addresses.
I need that because I have the following situation:
An exchange server sends to postfix an email with multiple addresses in th
On 2017-03-21 12:26 PM, Carlo Poggiarelli wrote:
Hi,
using postfix as relay,
when it receives an email with the TO field with multiple addresses, is
possible to send a single copy of that email to each of that addresses?
What exactly are you trying to avoid? Do you just not want the
recipien
On 2017-03-16 09:34 PM, paul.greene.va wrote:
I've been given a task to get a freshly installed postfix server to
forward mail from an application - i.e. when changes are made to an
application, the application is supposed to send an email notification
to a specified email address.
I'm not sure
On 2017-02-12 01:06 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Last month it was 20 years ago that I started writing Postfix code.
Congratulations and thanks!
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Administrator, Vex.Net
http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:da...@vex.net
VoIP: sip:da...@vex.net
On 2017-02-04 06:35 AM, A. Schulze wrote:
works as long you avoid antivirus snakeoil and perl based spam filtering.
I assume that that is a dig at Spamassassin. Just curious what tools
you would suggest replacing it with. This is an honest question. I do
find SA a bit of a hog and wonder i
On 2017-01-19 05:37 PM, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
Please why pop3d become Login Failed for user joe?
var/log/mail.log
Jan 19 22:25:40 raspberrypi postfix/master[8771]: reload -- version
3.1.4, configuration /etc/postfix
Jan 19 22:26:26 raspberrypi pop3d: Connection, ip=[:::192.168.1.10]
Jan
On 2017-01-13 03:38 PM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
I have this email that had 2 users in the CC field, and only one got the
email.
Anyone see any obvious reason why ?
mehgan.willi...@uconn.edu did NOT get the email.
Not enough logs. First, there are three users in the Cc, not two and
your log s
On 2017-01-05 11:53 AM, linux-service wrote:
I did changed joomla from phpmail to sendmail and the problem is over,
even with body_checks enabled
Just goes to show - if you have a problem and you think that PHP is the
solution then you have two problems. :-)
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
System Admin
On 2016-11-15 08:09 AM, Volker Cordes wrote:
Hello,
I just stopped our server from sending out spam mails. A password from
one of our customers was hacked or somehow leaked so that the mails were
sent by an authenticated user. Now I was wondering if it is possible to
block users that authenticat
On 2016-10-31 03:39 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:20:29PM -0400, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
Is this expected behaviour? I set smtp_bind_address to our
external interface to receive email
It affects outbound *only* ... it has nothing to do with mail
reception.
Doh! I
Is this expected behaviour? I set smtp_bind_address to our external
interface to receive email but I want to be able to send email
internally. I do not need to receive on the the internal address.
When I send mail to our internal network I just get a "Connection timed
out" error. I can't se
I have a Postfix server that has to receive messages with special X-
headers that I use to update a database before sending the message on.
I store the message ID, current timestamp and details taken from the X-
headers for later processing. Later I scan the logs so that I can
update the datab
25 matches
Mail list logo
