On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:42:11AM -0600, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 6:00 AM, Chris G wrote:
> >Currently my mydestination line looks like:-
> >
> > zbmc.eu, dps.zbmc.eu, localhost
> >
> >This is on the mail server which receives E-Mail from the '
Currently my mydestination line looks like:-
zbmc.eu, dps.zbmc.eu, localhost
This is on the mail server which receives E-Mail from the 'outside
world' from whose point of view my system is zbmc.eu. Is the
dps.zbmc.eu entry actually necessary or will mail for dps.zbmc.eu be
accepted anyway be
I have a mail sent across my LAN (from postfix to postfix) whose headers
start as follows:-
From r...@zbmc.eu Tue Nov 23 08: 2:13 2010
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: root
Delivered-To: r...@zbmc.eu
Received: by mws.zbmc.eu (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 1282856013B; Tue
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:39:34PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> Larger sites tend to run with virtual_alias_domains valid both inside
> and outside, with internal rewriting to direct each user's mail to the
> right mail store. Internal-only email address namespaces are more in
> SOHO sites, y
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:15:24PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:03:26PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
>
> > E.g. I want messages from postmaster/root/cron on my dps server to be
> > distinguishable from similar messages from the server called mws.
>
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Chris G:
> > I have several machines behind a NAT router which run postfix. Some of
> > these machines are desktop machines with real users who create and send
> > mail while others are (usually headless) server
I have several machines behind a NAT router which run postfix. Some of
these machines are desktop machines with real users who create and send
mail while others are (usually headless) servers where the only mail is
generally that sent by cron jobs and other similar status information.
All of the
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:04:57PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:32:24PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
>
> > > It is not legal for a DNS CNAME RRset to coexist with other data for
> > > the same domain name. Nor should you have multiple CNAME records f
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:25:52PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:47:45AM +0000, Chris G wrote:
>
> > ch...@dps:/etc/postfix$ host mws.zbmc.eu
> > mws.zbmc.eu has address 192.168.1.4
> > mws.zbmc.eu is an alias for zbmc.eu.
> &g
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:47:45AM +, Chris G wrote:
>
> ... and that has resolved the DNS/IP problem at least though I'm still
> getting "relaying denied". So now the relayhost (192.168.1.4) is
> rejecting the E-Mail from the client (192.168.1.2) even though I
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 02:34:50PM -0500, Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 2:03 PM, Chris G wrote:
> >Er, it's Postfix isn't it? :-) Or have I misunderstood completely
> >(quite likely!).
> >
> >When I 'telnet mws.zbmc.eu 25' fr
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:42:21PM -0600, Larry Stone wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, mouss wrote:
>
> >so, your client says
> > relay=zbmc.eu[84.45.228.40]
> >and your server says
> > reject: RCPT from unknown[84.45.228.40]
> >
> >So your client and server have the same IP. This means that
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:17:17PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Le 16/11/2010 19:58, Chris G a écrit :
> >On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:47:26PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> >>On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:39:49PM +, Chris G wrote:
> >>
> >>>>It sounds like you
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:58:06PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:50:02PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
>
> > So where is there a system sending this mail which appears to be
> > 84.45.228.40?
> >
> > From what I can see in the logs the mail
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:47:26PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:39:49PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
>
> > > It sounds like you have both Postfix and Sendmail on the same systems,
> > > and perhaps confused about which MTA is handling which
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:27:56PM -0600, Larry Stone wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Chris G wrote:
>
> >Yes, I realise that "It connects from 84.45.228.40" but I can find no
> >reason at all *why* the postfix server process on mws.zbmc.eu thinks
> >that t
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:13:48PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:06:27PM +0000, Chris G wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:34:38PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > Chris G:
> > > > Yes, I realise that "It connect
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:34:38PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Chris G:
> > Yes, I realise that "It connects from 84.45.228.40" but I can find no
> > reason at all *why* the postfix server process on mws.zbmc.eu thinks
> > that the connection is from 84.45.228
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:52:36AM -0500, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> Chris G wrote:
> >I have a small SoHo network of machines and I have postfix installed on
> >most of them for sending mail. The machines sit behind a NAT router
> >which connects them to the internet, the doma
I have a small SoHo network of machines and I have postfix installed on
most of them for sending mail. The machines sit behind a NAT router
which connects them to the internet, the domain name (as seen from the
outside world) is zbmc.eu. All the machines are running xubuntu 10.04
and have postfi
20 matches
Mail list logo
