On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 11:00 +, Laura Smith via Postfix-users wrote:
> I know you're desperately trying to finger point elsewhere but I'm
> pretty sure you are barking up the wrong tree. Everything else
> works, apart from postfix.
At the risk of demonstrating my level of thick I have seen sim
I should pay more attention to which e-mail address I am using to
instill confidence.
Bob
On Thu, 2024-07-25 at 20:31 +0100, Keith wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-07-25 at 13:07 -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > Bob via Postfix-users:
> > > Having put my foot in
Apologies if my random ignorance has been a bit much.
Thanks for taking the time to look at the posibilities and also discuss
them with added words for me to look in to. The mention of Policy
Servers and Milters along with the information that is supplied to them
by Postfix causes me to come up wi
Thanks... Toddles of to read about PostScreen
"Wietse expects that the zombie problem will get worse before things
improve, if ever."
Waves. Sorry if I am being ittitating.
Bob
On Thu, 2024-07-25 at 00:12 +1000, Gary R. Schmidt via Postfix-users
wrote:
> This is exactly what postscreen - which
Not sure when it happened but when I had to reinstall it on my Pi the
Pi was missing, ISTR, rsyslog so it was not the fault of Postfix. I
just had to put rsyslog back in and logging was back to normal.
Your link has the glimmer of a plan but would I not be back to having
to periodically scan stdou
Yes. It was just an example. However many of these uninvited warts
don't publish such information and I have no doubt that they
periodically roll addresses. No I am not going to send them an e-mail
so they can pretend to go away.
The rest of my logs are stuffed with "user<>" and "unknown" or "does
I get it might be a bit flakey from a security perspective and should
come with warnings but it is my box.
As an aside the contents of my /etc/postfix directory are owned by root
so I assume Postfix needs root priveledges to access them.
That seems like its already halfway down that particular ra
Oooops. Also applies to me :)
Bob
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 14:51 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-
users wrote:
> This article is 9 years old and apparently some parts of it are
> obsolete...
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfi
iptables -A INPUT -s "$i" -
j DROP
No need for an external script.
Bob
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 13:26 +0100, Bob via Postfix-users wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe sen
directly notify my
simple script rather than going around these additinal houses.
Miss out the middle men.
Bob
On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 14:11 +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Dnia 24.07.2024 o godz. 00:14:51 Bob via Postfix-users pisze:
> > I want "Kill on Sight".
&
I know of such things but I am not sure that they are the solution to
my problem in as much as they are lists of known spammers.
Other than the Hotmail SEO/APP Cretins I have, fingers crossed, only
suffered from two persistent idiots that are rejected in
headers_check.
Not that any of them pay
tries containing certain domain
> names.
>
> See
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail2ban
> https://fail2ban.readthedocs.io/en/latest/filters.html
>
> Yours,
> Reg
>
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. Juli 2024 um 23:14 Uhr
> > Von: "Bob via Postfix-users"
> >
Hi,
Apologies if this a silly suggestion. I have hunted high and low for a
thing that would be simple for someone who is simple. I get the
impression from the usual sources such as stackexchange that there is
no easy or rather simple answer.
Whilst I have spotted 'spawn' as a possibility of invok
13 matches
Mail list logo
