Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 25.10.2017 um 20:55 schrieb Emanuel:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I use Postfix, clamav and spamassain to figth the spam in my server.
>>
>> I my custom_rules from spamassasin i add the following rule to give 100
>> points to emails that contain infected attachments.
>>
>> prio
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Greetings and a happy new year,
>
>
> I still am in a situation where I occasionally need to have an SMTP
> client (preferable Postfix's) talk through an SSH tunnel.
>
> I know we have the smtp(8) client, and we have the pipe(8) client for
> injecting RFC5322 stuff into co
Alfredo Saldanha wrote:
> Is there some way to use milter check in a type of conditional ?
> In my situation here, it can not be mandatory to each message.
> I'm asking this because some users here want to receive all messages without
> Spam verification.
>
> Part of my main.cf:
> http://dpaste.c
Claus Assmann wrote:
>> With SMTP there is no per-recipiet end-of-data reply, and a
>> reject reply will block mail for all recipients.
>
> AFAICT PRDR can do that -- it's implemented in exim and some other MTA.
> However, it's barely used...
One way to "encourage" its implementation would be to
Gyeong Deok Kwon wrote:
> Hello postfix community,
>
> I have a postfix(from source code) + dovecot setup for my university
> term-project.
> I want postfix call my custom function whenever postfix receive mails,
> but couln't find the function.
>
> Can I know the function of handling mail recepti
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Andrzej A. Filip:
>> wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
>> [...]
>> > In any case, using UNIX system account names with @ is a mistake,
>> > and I will not put in a great deal of effort to make that easy.
>
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
[...]
> In any case, using UNIX system account names with @ is a mistake,
> and I will not put in a great deal of effort to make that easy.
IMHO it does make sense at big system shared by a few+ "loosely coupled"
organizations or in server group sharing
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
> Andrzej A. Filip:
>> Is it possible to make postfix handle OS usernames with @ in them?
>> How to do it?
>
> Use virtual(8) instead of local(8).
Should I expect some problems selecting virtual mailer for deliveries to
j...@exam
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:04:23AM +0200, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to make postfix handle OS usernames with @ in them?
>
> The local(8) delivery agent does not support these. If you hand
> these off to some other delivery agent,
Is it possible to make postfix handle OS usernames with @ in them?
How to do it?
My question is inspired (closely related but not identical) by
http://serverfault.com/q/709153/163277
| Q: Postfix virtual domain mapping user for a user a linux name containing @
--
A. Filip
On 01/28/2014 03:10 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 08:21:01AM +0100, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
>
>>>> Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective?
>>>
>>> What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are
On 01/28/2014 12:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrzej A. Filip:
>> Do you plan to support SRV DNS records in a few years perspective?
>
> What real problem does this solve? Developer cycles are finite
> and must be spent wisely.
IMHO it would allow better configuration of (in
On 01/27/2014 09:37 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Quanah Gibson-Mount:
>> As part of making Zimbra more robust, we're abstracting our data layer.
>> Currently, LMTP delivery is configured to point at a specific mailstore,
>> which accepts delivery and stores the email in a SQL database. As part of
On 01/25/2014 02:22 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Andrzej A. Filip:
>> On 01/25/2014 02:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Francina Oates:
>>>> The lack of socks support is an increasingly serious shortcoming
>>>> of Postfix.
>>>
>>> You a
On 01/25/2014 02:27 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Francina Oates:
>> The lack of socks support is an increasingly serious shortcoming
>> of Postfix.
>
> You are welcome to donate code.
>
> Wietse
>
As I understand it requires passing preset LD_PRELOAD environment variable.
http://tsocks.sou
On 12/30/2013 04:55 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:09:12PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> Indeed. SMTPUTF8 support involves more than the 1% that says "I can
>> do SMTPUTF8" in the EHLO handshake. There is a whole list of RFCs
>> that need to be supported first.
>
> I t
On 12/29/2013 05:51 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Freek Dijkstra:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Postfix does not support international email addresses, such as
>> jos?@example.org, as described by RFC 6530-6532. To be precise, the
>> SMPTUTF8 (previously: UTF8SMTP) SMTP extension is not announced in the
>> EHLO r
17 matches
Mail list logo
