[pfx] Re: OpenDMARC question

Hi Geert, thanks for your reply! Am 25.01.2025 um 00:17 schrieb Geert Hendrickx via Postfix-users: On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 22:56:40 +0100, Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users wrote: I have set ‘RejectFailures true’ in /etc/opendmarc.conf. My expectation was that mails without a dmarc signature

[pfx] Re: OpenDMARC question

Many thanks for your reply, Bill. Am 24.01.2025 um 23:41 schrieb Bill Cole via Postfix-users: On 2025-01-24 at 16:56:40 UTC-0500 (Fri, 24 Jan 2025 22:56:40 +0100) Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: Hi, dear list members! I don't know if I'm asking in the r

[pfx] OpenDMARC question

Hi, dear list members! I don't know if I'm asking in the right place, but since opendmarc is configured as a milter in Postfix, I'll just ask it. Today I received a mail that did not have a dmarc signature. 2025-01-24T21:52:15.374433+01:00 crosis opendkim[1183]: C01D06003F: m6.so-net.net.tw

[pfx] Re: Postfix and Spamhaus

As it seems bind turns off qname minimization for queries to SH. As I can find something like this in the query log: named[4205]: success resolving '49.236.215.178.6.zen.dq.spamhaus.net/A' after disabling qname minimization due to 'ncache nxdomain So, I'd say it's not necessa

[pfx] Re: Postfix and Spamhaus

Hi Tomasz, can you explain why it's better to turn off QNAME minimization MTAs and spam checkers? Andreas Am 14.01.2025 um 18:56 schrieb Steffan Cline via Postfix-users: Just FYI, it's better to turn off QNAME minimization on DNS servers used by MTAs and spam checkers. My NSes

[pfx] Re: Is the bounce message text customisable?

Dear Geert, thanks for yor quick reply. I've added this to my main.cf file now. Works!                 Andreas Am 06.01.2025 um 22:15 schrieb Geert Hendrickx: On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 22:09:27 +0100, Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users wrote: A text that simply states that the user is un

[pfx] Is the bounce message text customisable?

Kind regards            Andreas ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] Re: OpenDKIM is added twice

re is added in the desired order by opendkim when I send an email, which is then also verified as valid. A successful DKIM signature check is now also carried out for incoming mails. So the problem is solved. Thank you for your help in solving the problem.             An

[pfx] Re: OpenDKIM is added twice

postfix") Now I am completely confused and don't know how to proceed. Unfortunately, I can find almost nothing on the subject of opendkim integration (signing/verification) in amavis. At least nothing that is promising.     Merry X-mas     Andreas ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] Re: OpenDKIM is added twice

?             Andreas Am 24.12.2024 um 15:44 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users: On 24.12.24 09:08, Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users wrote: I have to correct myself. If I only add the no_milters here, a DKIM signature is added and the header check also works, it looks like, but for the body

[pfx] Re: OpenDKIM is added twice

p[2072]: connect to 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10026: Connection refused  A merry X-mas to you!         Andreas Am 24.12.2024 um 16:04 schrieb Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users: Hi Matus, As suggested by Wietse and you, I want to add the DKIM signature to amavis in conjunction with OpenDKIM, but I

[pfx] Re: OpenDKIM is added twice

n the mail.log: Am 24.12.2024 um 15:44 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users: On 24.12.24 09:08, Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users wrote: I have to correct myself. If I only add the no_milters here, a DKIM signature is added and the header check also works, it looks like, but for the bo

[pfx] Re: OpenDKIM is added twice

.s=default header.b=kyrK6Z3o;* Perhaps I should test whether I let amavis handle the DKIM? Now I'm a bit dismayed and don't know what to do.* * Kind regards **Andreas* * Am 24.12.2024 um 02:14 schrieb Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users: Hi Wietse, thanks for your reply. Am 24.12.2

[pfx] Re: OpenDKIM is added twice

Hi Wietse, thanks for your reply. Am 24.12.2024 um 01:32 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users: Hello, I am running my Postfix server with Amavis, Spamassassin, Clamav and have added a configuration for OpenDKIM, OpenDMARC and SPF. Sending and receiving

[pfx] OpenDKIM is added twice

eeded? Regards         Andreas ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] Re: Date/Time String in American Format

e for me.         Andreas Am 15.12.2024 um 15:52 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users: Postfix uses the RFC 5322 date/time format, you say. On the subject of RFC 5322 date/time format, I can find the following in the ?date? man page: ?-R, --rfc-

[pfx] Re: Date/Time String in American Format

x27;m asking this to understand this.         Andreas Am 15.12.2024 um 13:57 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users: Hello, currently, some dates appear in American format. As can be seen at the end of the line below: 2024-12-15T09:48:57.200203+01:00

[pfx] Date/Time String in American Format

this a question of the rsyslog settings? I would be grateful for help with this. Kind regards Andreas ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] Re: Configuring header/body checks for mail from outside users only

pickup service is no longer ‘messed up’, I made the changes to the master.cf. Now, of course, the warning message no longer appears. Great! Many thanks again. Am 09.12.2024 um 19:59 schrieb Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users: Hello, I run a Postfix server with

[pfx] Configuring header/body checks for mail from outside users only

anyone here have an answer? Which connection is refused? Kind regards Andreas This is my main.cf configuration: alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases append_dot_mydomain = no authorized_submit_users = root,www-data,vmail biff = no body_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix

[pfx] Re: question about postmaster account

and including RFC 5322. In this context, RFC 2142 may be of interest, too. --Andreas -- ! AJ3630-RIPE @ RUB8-RIPENetwork Operation Center ! ! Dezernat 5.3 Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum ! ! The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is

[pfx] Re: Subject modification based on recipient

; postfix-users@postfix.org>: > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > > Andreas Cieslak via Postfix-users: > > > Hi list, > > > > > > i want to achieve that my postfix relay will modify the subject based > on > > > the recipients. > > > The postfiy

[pfx] Subject modification based on recipient

solve this? Any hints would be appreciated. Thank you. Andreas ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

Re: Verify daemon replaces ":" with "_" in addresses using Quoted-String form

y given that this has been in the code base for so long :) Andreas On 13.06.22 17:48, Wietse Venema wrote: Andreas Weigel: Hi, I recently noticed some (for me) unexpected behavior with address verification probes (reject_unverified_recipient in smtpd_relay_restrictions). Given an envelope rec

Verify daemon replaces ":" with "_" in addresses using Quoted-String form

sible for the observed behavior. I'd expect the verify daemon to re-quote the local part when sending out a probe in that case, i.e. transmit a probe for <"a:b"@example.org>. Am I overlooking some obvious issue here why this would be a bad idea? Kind regards, Andreas Weigel

nullmx_reject_code gone from source but not from docs

stconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: nullmx_reject_code=553" Kind regards, Andreas

postfix 3.5.X: Issue with reconstruction of long header lines (suspect: smtp)

I haven't been able to put my finger on the exact location. Andreas --- Begin Message --- There is not much interesting stuff going on here. Just some regular email plain text. --- End Message --- postconf -n alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases append_do

Re: (TENTATIVE patch): postfix 3.5.X: Issue with reconstruction of long header lines (suspect: smtp)

I can confirm that the proposed patch fixes the issue. Just tested with postfix 3.5.7 patched and unpatched. On 04.11.20 12:18, Wietse Venema wrote: Viktor Dukhovni: On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:32:57AM -0500, Andreas Weigel wrote: Hi everyone, I think I stumbled upon a problem with postfix

Limiting smtpd_upstream_proxy_protocol to certain IPs

rged? Or do you think this is not a good idea? Or did I just read the code incorrectly and stuff actually works fine? cheers, Andreas

policyd, prepend and long lines

urce implementations of policy daemons and it seems nobody has handled the case of long line headers. Is there a good way of folding the header? Should postfix be doing that automatically already? cheers, Andreas

Re: "SSL_Shutdown:shutdown while in init" while sending and receiving

n explanation for my taste. -- -- Andreas :-)

warning: TLS library problem: routines:ssl_choose_client_version:unsupported protocol?

Hi everyone. I have a php contact form, that reports the following postfix error (getting that in maillog file): https://hastepaste.com/view/jr41N The same applies for, when I send an e-mail to that e-mail address by using Outlook. Obviously my mail server having troubles sending e-mails to some

Re: Trying to understand smtpd_recipient_restrictions order

Hi Viktor, On Thu, 9 May 2019, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On May 9, 2019, at 1:13 PM, Andreas Thienemann wrote: I have the following items in my config: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail fair enough... Problem description: smtpd_recipient_restrictions seems to be working

Trying to understand smtpd_recipient_restrictions order

n01 postfix/smtpd[24094]: generic_checks: name=reject_unverified_recipient status=2 May 9 18:47:33 mailin01 postfix/smtpd[24094]: >>> END Recipient address RESTRICTIONS <<< Does anyone have any pointers what I might be missing? cheers, Andreas

Re: Virtual Mailbox Delivery with mixed address classes.

le.com). What would be your preferred solution? 1. would be the easy fix. 2. seems cleaner but I am not sure about any side effects. 3. would be the most work but I fear this might be necessary anyway for moving from local to virtual mailboxes for my main domain... Any suggestions? cheers, Andreas

Re: Virtual Mailbox Delivery with mixed address classes.

Hi Viktor, On Sun, 5 May 2019, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 02:38:15AM +0200, Andreas Thienemann wrote: I currently have a mailserver that serves as final destination for a domain, say example.com which is configured as mydestination. This works, but I generally prefer to

Virtual Mailbox Delivery with mixed address classes.

glad if someone could give me a hint here... The more docs I read, the less clearer things become. ;-) Thanks, Andreas

Re: Postfix and smfi_setmlreply() milter command resulting in SMTP protocol breakage.

Hi Wietse, On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, Wietse Venema wrote: I do not know if skipping the printable() call does have any side-effects though. As a short-term fix it is probably OK, because the cleanup daemon already filters the response. But smtpd should not rely on the cleanup server doing that. R

Re: Postfix and smfi_setmlreply() milter command resulting in SMTP protocol breakage.

st Milter rejection Reason <** 450-4.7.1 Test Milter rejection Reason 01 <** 450 4.7.1 Test Milter rejection Reason 02 -> QUIT <- 221 2.0.0 Bye === Connection closed with remote host. cheers, Andreas

Re: Postfix and smfi_setmlreply() milter command resulting in SMTP protocol breakage.

and a proper solution for Postfix 3,5 and onwards. Hahaha, thank you very much. I appreciate it. Especially as we all know about that copious spare time. If it helps, the sample milter I used is at https://gist.github.com/ixs/70ec5ba23c8da0c9ee3c682eeb8fe452 cheers, Andreas

Re: Postfix and smfi_setmlreply() milter command resulting in SMTP protocol breakage.

her hand, this seems to be the source for the ?? replacement in the log message. cheers, Andreas

Postfix and smfi_setmlreply() milter command resulting in SMTP protocol breakage.

nse -> QUIT > : 51 55 49 54 0D 0AQUIT.. < : 32 32 31 20 32 2E 30 2E 30 20 42 79 65 0D 0A 221.2.0.0.Bye.. <- 221 2.0.0 Bye === Connection closed with remote host. The lines are separated by 0x20, 0x20 ([space][space]) rather than 0x0d, 0x0a (\n\r). I had a quick look at the postfix source but did not find the right codepath where this happens. Any ideas if this really is a bug in Postfix or am I making a mistake somewhere in my milter? cheers, Andreas

Re: best practice - integrating spamassassin/clamav in postfix - amavis yes/no?

based on the fact that Postfix with postscreen itself blocks the by far largest part of malicious mail. Of course, YMMV, -- -- Andreas :-)

NULL pointer deref in pcf_check_dbms_client() with unreadable map file

Hi, postfix-3.3.0 we got a bug report (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/ 1753470) where postconf was crashing if main.cf had a map pointing to a file that the user couldn't read. ubuntu@bionic-postfix:~$ l /etc/postfix/valiases.cf -rw-r- 1 root root 169 May 7 14:08 /et

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold and SORBS and Google

I also use postwhite and similar whitelisting, but I also have postscreen_dnsbl_sites = ... list.dnswl.org=127.0.[5;9].0*-2 -- -- Andreas :-)

Re: Controlling submission recipients

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, at 16:27, Alex wrote: I don't have enough perl knowledge to join or associate then parse multiple lines. Did you have a look at auxiliary/collate from Postfix's source? -- -- Andreas :-)

Re: Controlling submission recipients

n called "debug" and can WARN. But RTFM again or, as Noel wrote, get on the Postfwd mailing list. -- -- Andreas :-)

Re: check_recipient_access after rewrite happens

ails not being deliverable through lmtp... I can live with that. cheers, Andreas

Re: check_recipient_access after rewrite happens

only work for virtual aliases with one level of redirection but not for something like i...@example.com -> i...@example.net -> spam-mails. But I should get most of the problematic entries with that. Thanks for the suggestion. cheers, Andreas

check_recipient_access after rewrite happens

ng to the logs. Is there a way to configure postfix to check after rewriting of addresses? cheers, Andreas

Re: Mixing of address classes per domain

have been consulted, but then again I also did not have the j...@real.example.com mapping back to itself. Is that entry needed in such a form? cheers, Andreas

Mixing of address classes per domain

have a hint how to get this working correctly? Adding the domain to both virtual_domains and relay_domains seems to work but as far as I understand previous discussions here on the list this is a rather bad idea. Cheers, Andreas

Re: MIME header checks matching

sting to add the frequently abused `.jar` to the regex. -- -- Andreas :-)

multiple actions, SPF to skip greylist

ion? [1]: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Idea-multiple-actions-in-access-header-checks-policy-results-td71906.html -- -- Andreas :-)

Re: Forged FROM Adresses deny based on actual user?

sender > leads you to > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_unlisted_sender Thanks, you are right that I was confused about this reference. So, smtpd_sender_restrictions = (...) warn_if_reject reject_unlisted_sender works as expected but only if smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = no. -- -- Andreas :-)

Re: Forged FROM Adresses deny based on actual user?

On Sun, 7 May 2017, at 15:04, Wietse Venema wrote: > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = yes Is there a way to test-run this similar to warn_if_reject? -- -- Andreas

Protection for Forwarding Loop

s and just stop them? No matter on all the LDAP stuff, shouldn't postfix be intelligent enough to detect if forwarding source and destination are similar? It would be great, if someone has an idea how we could solve this! Cheers, Andreas Krischer akbyte webentwicklung Pastor-Lüpschen-Str. 82 52

Re: AntiSpam & AntiVirus Integration with Postfix: lots of tools, but which one's AREN'T 'dead'?

a Postfix question, but I'm hoping that all the > Postfix-Gods in here might share an opinion or advice. My advice would be use amavis. I integrates very well with Postfix and is running just fine. It does Spam- and Viruschecking and intergrates DKIM as well if you like to use it. Greetings Andreas

Re: postmulti fatal error with 3.0.0

Am 2/18/2015 um 18:39 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: > With 3.0.0 Linux distributions should start using the upstream > default. This does mean that users should remove explicit legacy > default settings of daemon_directory from their main.cf files. > Distribution package upgrades will need to update or

Re: postmulti fatal error with 3.0.0

irst adopted upstream. Since, as you said, some distributions lack /usr/libexec, wouldn't it be a better idea to leave it up to the package/distribution maintainers to separate shared objects from shared executables? Andreas

Re: postmulti fatal error with 3.0.0

ebian, Arch, and probably more) daemon_directory is /usr/lib/postfix as well, which will lead to a broken multi-instance capability by default. Hopefully i just missed some important point. Andreas Am 2/18/2015 um 01:32 schrieb Wietse Venema: > Andreas: >> Hi, >> >> i insta

postmulti fatal error with 3.0.0

ib/postfix conflicts with instance /etc/postfix, > daemon_directory=/usr/lib/postfix makedefs.out: http://pastebin.com/HhD0AZKQ Only if i set shlib_directory=no all works as expected. I'm wondering if this is normal. --Andreas

Re: Unable to receive mail: Relay access denied

Since the virtual_mailbox_domains default value is virtual_mailbox_maps I thought I didn't need a new query, but it works! Thank you a lot!

Unable to receive mail: Relay access denied

omain.com/me/ Now why postfix doesn't lookup mydomain.com over MySQL? Best regards, Andreas

Re: What exactly does that mean: maildrop/6B8F696F6: error writing 2737698C0: no recipients specified

echo '* Infodateien ohne Queuedateien:' echo '' echo ${ORPHANED_FILES} | xargs ls -la fi That cronjob produces output very rarely but mostly after manual interaction ( postsuper -r ALL and so ) Andreas

Re: PATCH: Milter header position semantics

: from opendmarc-milter Authentication-Results: from opendkim-milter X-Spam-foo: added by amavisd-milter from amavisd + spamassassin Received: from MTA Authentication-Results: from spf-milter ... in short: no problem here (as before ...) Andreas

Re: Per-Milter attributes (was: Question for syntax in snapshot 20120921)

rom me: Thank you. this is the definitive reason to switch from 2.11.1 to 2.12-x here :-) Andreas

Unlisted recipients do not get rejected

tion - because it has access to all the information that verify has, so that smtpd could reject itself in this situation. Thanks for any advice. Avoiding backscatter here would be a great achievement. Andreas Complete main.cf: -8<--- smtpd_b

Re: milter email classification

André Rodier: > I cannot see in the SpamAssassin rules documentation a way to add > headers. point for you. Adding any header with SA isn't possible at a first view. You may ask again on spamassasin-users Andreas

Re: milter email classification

André Rodier: > I am looking for a milter script (mail filter) that would classify > emails automatically. Something in Perl, for instance. you could use spamassassin for that purpose, too. write your own SA rules and your done. Andreas

Re: Connection stats (was: Re: Why "lost connection after RCPT" when we reject?)

to "postconf -e "debug_peer_list=$buggy_client" when searching anomalies and would expect such details only in that context. Andreas

Re: is 7bit conversion logged?

e. > > Are there other situations postfix has to recode a message? > No. good Thanks, Andreas

Re: On DKIM and Content-Transfer-Encoding

ck if you test the right way at all. Andreas

Re: PATCH: one line of output from pipe to add to logging

3 08:43:10 2014 Hello Wietse, I wonder about changes in tls_server.c !? Andreas

Re: Logging TLS info as part of mail transactions

ot;dane"). This suggestion makes sense People just want to know the overall channel security status. yes, I mostly like to distinguish plain vs. TLS The "security" element can either be always present, with "none" to signal non-TLS delivery, or simply absent to signal the same. As admins have to adjust logfile parser anyway, I would prefer version #1 Andreas

Re: Client side DANE - minimum openssl version

Viktor Dukhovni: > It may be simpler to upgrade your system. yes, upgrade would be best but sometimes, older crypto is not as painfull as it should be Andreas

Re: Client side DANE - minimum openssl version

Robert Schetterer: > > openssl 0.9.8j and Postfix 2.11.1. > maybe a suboptimal mixture any hint's to build postfix + openssl-1.x on a system based on openssl-0.9.x ??? I also avoided building openssl from source for good reasons over the last years. But I'm open to try. Andreas

Re: prepend header by policy server, action taken in milter

Alexandre Ellert: I'm going to test by adding a first useless header in the policy server and see if things works in the milter. also consider using a milter based SPF checker. Lock at the opendmarc-users archive for suggestions. Andreas

Re: warning TLS 1.2 postfix 2.11

end to you because they try/have only a higher protocol version. But these should fallback to plaintext anyway. Andreas

Re: Permit SASL authenticated users to bypass DMARC

... -o smtpd_milters=${dkim_milter},${dmarc_milter} sumbission inet ... -i smtpd_milters=${dkim_milter} this master.cf is much more selfexplaining. Andreas

Re: Force "AUTH" before "MAIL FROM" command for submission port 587

lists: To get a "+", the descriptions says: "Your system requires authentication (AUTH) on port 587 before the MAIL FROM command is issued" that is pure nonsense +1 you cannot enforce any client to not send any command. but you can enforce proper answers. Andreas

Re: Bounce mails manually

LuKreme: > OK, what is pfqgrep? I don't see it in my ports tree? see http://www.arschkrebs.de/postfix/scripts/

Re: Bounce mails manually\

wietse: But wait, there is more does not sound like an easy job. just an idea: if the timestamp of a queuefile is relevant, could a changed time of a queuefile be interpreted as "bounce immediately" ? for example timestamp to a fixed date near 1.1.1970 Andreas

Re: Bounce mails manually

would sometimes be useful to postbounce Andreas

Re: patch: smpd insert DSN request

e your suggested solution. Andreas

Re: Make TLS errors hard, not soft

Wietse Venema: > Assuming that you haven't configured a global policy of "all mail > deliveries shall use TLS", that's exactly the limitation Peer has in mind. Andreas

Re: Bounce mails manually

Birta Levente: Yes, but you sould give some reason why is bounced ... which IMHO is something permanent ... good point! # postbounce so you just set up one time some map and no more care about that problem. just this is unwanted and the reason for the request. Andreas

Re: Bounce mails manually

Birta Levente: Why not just delete from the queue? from senders perspective that message is lost. sometimes it's useful to clear bounce back to sender. Andreas

patch: smpd insert DSN request

. Maybe it could be included in postfix some day. usage: master.cf submission inet n - n - - smtpd -o syslog_name=postfix/submission_with_dsn -o smtpd_force_dsn_on_success=yes Andreas Index: postfix-2.11.0/src/global/mail_params.h

Re: Bounce mails manually

for the question. I also needed such feature some times. # postbounce Andreas

Re: Message reject based on absense of a header(s)

eases/) Andreas

Re: DKIM verification vith virtual domains in same machine

check your own identity card to prove that you are you? ) But I assume your problem is consistent behaviour. If that is the point you have to split mail flows: * separate system signing all submitted messages * separate system validating any inbound messages. Andreas

Re: Changing domain name and certificates

/new.example.com/cert+intermediate.pem Andreas

add missing header if needed

Hello, I have to add a "Reply-To" Header in (smtp-) submitted messages. Adding it unconditionally using PREPEND result in messages with more then one instance of this header which violates RFC5322. Is there a way to add a header _only_ if not present? Thanks

Re: postfix-2.11 stable release candidate available

Zitat von wie...@porcupine.org: Postfix 2.11.0 stable release candidate 1 is uploaded to ftp.porcupine.org and will appear on mirror sites in the next 24 hours. 2.11x is running here on different hosts without problems. Andreas

tls_eecdh_*_curve

Hello, the documentation to these parameters refers the NSA website. However the links are broken. Also I don't feel very comfortable these days if postfix uses crypto approved by NSA :-/ Andreas

Re: International email addresses (RFC 6531)

eal name in the header section. Regards Andreas My opinion (slightly off topic but very relevant) having read the thread carefully: It is obvious that the English speaking world does not want to abandon ASCII. For their own reasons. If you want an RFC (or any project for that matter) to f

Re: Forward secrecy

rver that is only Trusted but not Verified) Andreas

Re: posttls-finger: RFE

Am 15.12.2013 22:08 schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter: > % unbound-control flush I prefer "unbound-control flush_zone " because "flush" don't flush TXT Andreas

Re: OT: Large corporate email systems - Exchange vs open source *nix based

min) I would not even consider (non-FOSS) Exchange for a second. Executives of course know-it-all-can-do-it-all type always win! That is why I am looking into retirement the soonest!! Thanks Andreas

  1   2   >