[pfx] subnets restrictions for specific address

Hi, Postfix 2.9.6 Is it possible to only allow certain subnets (LAN and VPN in my case) to send to a specific email address? Ideally, all other sources should be silently dropped. Regards, Adam ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users

[pfx] Re: sending email to FQDN address without DNS

Thank you sir, that's exactly what I was after. On 11/07/2024 19:49, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: With main.cf: disable_dns_lookups = yes smtp_host_lookup = native the Postfix SMTP client will usually look in /etc/hosts. Wietse ___

[pfx] sending email to FQDN address without DNS

mally sufficient. How about telling Postfix that this server is the MX record of example.com? With DNS working that's how Postfix normally figures it out, by requesting MX records and trying them by priority order, right? Without DNS, can I hardcode it somewhere? Reg

[pfx] Re: "delivered to command" config

After adding both lines and running postmap on /etc/postfix/virtual, both the base address and the alias reach the destination machine (server2). Thank you sir! On 28/05/2024 19:27, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: Adam Weremczuk via Postfix-users

[pfx] Re: "delivered to command" config

have authorization to see it. 550 5.1.1 User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command) Adam On 28/05/2024 14:28, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Adam Weremczuk via Postfix-users: Sorry, I'm still struggling to get anywhere with that. Just to recap what I'm trying to achieve: SER

[pfx] Re: "delivered to command" config

is delivered to bugzilla2 on SERVER2 locally should be fed to the command defined in ~bugzilla2/.forward file So my first objective, I guess, would be to allow that local user to receive emails from outside somehow and be treated as local emails. I feel like I'm missing something funda

[pfx] Re: "delivered to command" config

I obviously meant "remoteserver.mydomain.com", an external VM where Bugzilla has been migrated to. On 21/05/2024 11:10, Adam Weremczuk via Postfix-users wrote: Thank you Victor. What's the easiest way to change: bugzilla@mailserver:~$ cat ~/.forward "|/vol/localhom

[pfx] Re: "delivered to command" config

Thank you Victor. What's the easiest way to change: bugzilla@mailserver:~$ cat ~/.forward "|/vol/localhome/bugzilla/site/live/email_in.pl -vvv 2>/tmp/bz_emailin.log" to something like: remoteser...@mydomain.com:/vol/localhome/bugzilla/site/live/email_in.pl -vvv 2>/tmp/bz_emailin.log ? On 2

[pfx] "delivered to command" config

o email_in.pl located on another host (not locally). On Postfix/Cyrus server I've searched recursively all files in: /etc/ /vol/cyrus /var/mail for any references to email_in.pl but could find absolutely nothing configuration related. Any ideas how and

Relay to google chaning from address

Hi, I have setup a postfix relay to allow us t send some of our mail to google My main.cf looks like this inet_protocols = ipv4 append_dot_mydomain = no biff = no config_directory = /etc/postfix mailbox_size_limit = 0 readme_directory = no mydomain = blah.com myorigin = blah.com mynetworks = /et

STARTTLS abuse

450 4\.1\.8 <\S*>: Sender address rejected: Domain not found; from=<\S*> to=<\S+> proto=ESMTP helo=<\S*>$     ^%(__prefix_line)simproper command pipelining after \S+ from [^[]*\[\]:?$ ignoreregex = [Init] journalmatch = _SYSTEMD_UNIT=postfix.service # Author: Cyril Jaquier Any idea how to effectively ban these abusers? Thanks, Adam

Re: smtp_sasl_password_maps round robbin

instead of "{" I am running postfix-2.10.1-7.el7.x86_64 and the output of postconf -m shows btree cidr environ fail hash internal ldap memcache mysql nis pcre proxy regexp socketmap static tcp texthash unix Thanks Adam On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 19:58, Wietse Venema wrote: > Adam Barnett:

Re: smtp_sasl_password_maps round robbin

everything else to google. This is only for internal -> gmail mail which is mainly for scripts/programs using sendmail/mail cli Thanks Adam On Wed, 4 Aug 2021 at 16:43, wrote: > > I have setting upa Postfix relay to send from my iterenal network > > certain mail to our google wo

smtp_sasl_password_maps round robbin

account for the same relay so that gets picked randomly, like round robbin i.e [smtp.gmail.com]:587 f...@bar.com:bar [smtp.gmail.com]:587 f...@bar.com:bar [smtp.gmail.com]:587 f...@bar.com:bar This way i would never hit any sending limit Thanks Adam

Unable to connect to IMAP - Exceeded Maximum Number of Connections

ng but the issue didn't go away. My question: where do I find an option to slightly increase the limit on server side and what is it called? I've already looked into cyrus.conf, imapd.conf, postfix/main.cf, postfix/master.cf and few other places but couldn't find any obvious setting. Regards, Adam

Re: Client cert based relaying setup not working

On 3/11/20 3:59 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:46:03AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: I think Postfix doc could be improved, mentioning "smtpd_tls_ask_ccert" here http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#permit_tls_clientcerts would have been helpful. Feel free to post a patc

Re: Client cert based relaying setup not working

On 3/10/20 10:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 03:33:44PM +0100, Adam Cecile wrote: submission inet  n   -   y   -   -   smtpd     -o syslog_name=postfix/submission     -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt     -o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes

Client cert based relaying setup not working

But when I send an email, server says: postfix/submission/smtpd[569]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[1.2.3.4]: 554 5.7.1 : Client host rejected: Access denied Can someone give me a hint to get this working ? Thanks in advance, Regards, Adam.

Re: phising attacks

Thanks, i will look into it -- __ Adam Barnett Systems Engineer Double Negative 160 Great Portland Street,W1W 5QA T: 020-7268-5000 [ http://www.dneg.com/ | www.dneg.com ] __ - Original Message - | From: "Dominic Raferd" | To

Re: phising attacks

The from address will be, for example From: Jo Blogs But the return address and return path would be and different address from what Jo Blogs is I am 99% sure it is a user error, but just wondering if there was anything else to be done Thanks -- __ Adam Barnett

phising attacks

Hi Postfix Peeps We seem to be getting more phishing attacks that are being clever. The address looks like it someone internal but the from address is not that person. Any suggestions postfix or otherwise to help with these Thanks Adam

Re: Split Domain MTA relay access denied

ah, got it Thanks Adam -- __ Adam Barnett Systems Engineer Double Negative 160 Great Portland Street,W1W 5QA T: 020-7268-5000 [ http://www.dneg.com/ | www.dneg.com ] __ - Original Message - | From: "Wietse Venema" | To: &quo

Re: Split Domain MTA relay access denied

This was happening when sending internal to external so how can i populate relay_recipient_maps ? -- __ Adam Barnett Systems Engineer Double Negative 160 Great Portland Street,W1W 5QA T: 020-7268-5000 [ http://www.dneg.com/ | www.dneg.com

Re: transport map from ldap

4677]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/sbin/smtp: bad command startup -- throttling -- __ Adam Barnett Systems Engineer Double Negative 160 Great Portland Street,W1W 5QA T: 020-7268-5000 [ http://www.dneg.com/ | www.dneg.com ] __ - Original Messag

Re: transport map from ldap

There was this error as well Sep 19 14:59:47 foo postfix/qmgr[103420]: warning: connect to transport private/f...@bar.comrelay: No such file or directory -- __ Adam Barnett Systems Engineer Double Negative 160 Great Portland Street,W1W 5QA T: 020-7268-5000

Re: transport map from ldap

Hi, That is the only error Sep 19 14:59:54 foo postfix/error[103706]: 3C10828C082: to=, relay=none, delay=0.01, delays=0/0/0/0, dsn=4.3.0, status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) This is a MTA relay host Thanks -- __ Adam Barnett Systems Engineer Double

Re: transport map from ldap

um... I have tried both adamt...@foo.com relay:[smtp.foo.com] and relay:[smtp.foo.com] as the the output of the ldap lookup and i just get status=deferred (mail transport unavailable) error Thanks -- __ Adam Barnett Systems Engineer Double Negative 160

Transport Maps Clarification/Debugging

I have a Postfix server which receives mail for EXAMPLE.COM (bogasified); for for specific addresses I need to send that mail to another SMTP server. So transform_maps! I have "transport_maps = hash://map-path" and If I "postmap -q u...@example.com hash://map-path" it returns "smtp:[other.

Re: Outbound throttling feature

ather complex program that is best left as-is. > > -- > Viktor. Thanks for the feedback! Slowing down the SMTP delivery agent sure was easy... there are a few things to clean up, but the patch below seems to be giving the behavior I need. -Adam == WIP

Re: Outbound throttling feature

Attaching my WIP patch here... On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 04:37:11PM +, Adam Roses Wight wrote: > Many hosting providers limit the number of outbound SMTP connections over > time, and exceeding their threshold results in harsh consequences like > dropped connections and unpredictab

RE: Postfix ignores main.cf changes

his correct behavior that I am just misinterpreting as a problem? Thanks, A>AM -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Adam Courville Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 10:16 PM To: 'postfix users' Subject: RE

RE: Postfix ignores main.cf changes

On 8/31/2014 7:40 PM, Adam Courville wrote: > I apologize if this problem has been reported before, but I am having > no luck determining a resolution through online searches. > > > > Environment: Fedora Core 20 on a NATted server (private, static LAN > IPs through a rout

Postfix ignores main.cf changes

I apologize if this problem has been reported before, but I am having no luck determining a resolution through online searches. Environment: Fedora Core 20 on a NATted server (private, static LAN IPs through a router to the Internet). Postfix installed through yum method and is latest availab

Can I reject when sender doesn't appear in from: header?

I'm seeing messages occasionally where the envelope sender is a verifiable address at someone else's domain, but the from: header contains some non-existent user @ our local domain. Can postfix reject those messages? Can postfix perform address verification on from: or reply-to: headers?

Re: Compromised Passwords

Homer: Two steps eliminated this problem for us: 1) Accounts with more than 6 failed login attempts in a 10 minute period are disabled for 10 minutes. This makes brute force methods to find passwords almost impossible. 2) Limit to 200 outgoing messages per day per user. We'll raise it to

Re: Is it possible to verify "from:" header addresses?

This is not built-in. You can try to do this with a number of extension mechanisms: - header_checks with a socketmap: or tcp: based lookup table. Return REJECT for mail that you don't want. - External content-filter plugin (Milter, amavisd-new, etc.). Milters can be written in Python and ot

Re: Is it possible to verify "from:" header addresses?

We're doing sender verification for our local domains, so a message sent from "f...@plexicomm.net" gets rejected. A message with an envelope sender of "va...@spammer.com" with a from: header of "f...@plexicomm.net" gets accepted. Is there a way to enable verification on "from:" header addresses

Re: Is it possible to verify "from:" header addresses?

We're doing sender verification for our local domains, so a message sent from "f...@plexicomm.net" gets rejected. A message with an envelope sender of "va...@spammer.com" with a from: header of "f...@plexicomm.net" gets accepted. Is there a way to enable verification on "from:" header address

Is it possible to verify "from:" header addresses?

We're doing sender verification for our local domains, so a message sent from "f...@plexicomm.net" gets rejected. A message with an envelope sender of "va...@spammer.com" with a from: header of "f...@plexicomm.net" gets accepted. Is there a way to enable verification on "from:" header address

Re: relayhost and smtpd_recipient_restrictions

On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Wietse Venema wrote: Adam Pribyl: Hello, we were using postfix as mail server directly delivering email from and to company without issues. Now we had to change the ISP and the new one forces us to use his relay as "The next-hop destination of non-local mail" -

relayhost and smtpd_recipient_restrictions

own_recipient_domain even when using realyhost? Thanks Adam Pribyl

Re: Unauthenticated user and domain restriction

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:39:10PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: And my last question WHICH IS NOT LINKED TO MY PREVIOUS QUESTIONS, is it possible to force postfix to create a _from_ line in an email before sending it if the client didn't create it ? From: header is part of body content, thats

Re: Unauthenticated user and domain restriction

On 8/5/2012 11:24 PM, Adam NEVERT wrote: On 8/5/2012 10:13 PM, Adam NEVERT wrote: The client would be on my local network only /192.168.0.*/ and for any email sending I configure postfix so that it tries to use TLS if the client support it. So to sum up I want the user /maintenance/ to be

Re: Unauthenticated user and domain restriction

On 8/5/2012 10:13 PM, Adam NEVERT wrote: The client would be on my local network only /192.168.0.*/ and for any email sending I configure postfix so that it tries to use TLS if the client support it. So to sum up I want the user /maintenance/ to be able to send any email only from /192.168.0

Re: Unauthenticated user and domain restriction

* Adam NEVERT: I need to have a unical user who can send emails without authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ? How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ? I can tell it is a user because it is in my alias_maps take a deep breath! you

Re: Unauthenticated user and domain restriction

Hello, I need to have a unical user who can send emails without authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ? How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ? I can tell it is a user because it is in my alias_maps take a deep breath! you can tell

Re: Unauthenticated user and domain restriction

Hello, I need to have a unical user who can send emails without authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ? How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ? I can tell it is a user because it is in my alias_maps take a deep breath! you can tell NO

Re: Unauthenticated user and domain restriction

On 05/08/12 19:51, Adam NEVERT wrote: Hello, I need to have a unical user who can send emails without authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ? How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ? I can tell it is a user because it is in my

Unauthenticated user and domain restriction

Hello, I need to have a unical user who can send emails without authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?

Re: Q: Postfix MTA as a router - callback verification

Noel, Inline. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Noel Jones wrote: > On 6/14/2012 8:38 PM, Adam Bradley wrote: > > I have a situation where email delivered to a single namespace needs > > to be delivered to a user who could be in one of a number of > > downstream system (bu

Q: Postfix MTA as a router - callback verification

sting 2.mail.org (miss, send NDR) Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Adam | Identity Concepts | a: PO Box 451 Hamilton, | Brisbane, QLD 4007, Australia | m:+61 419 637 518 | e: adam_j_brad...@identityconcepts.com.au | im: adam_j_brad...@hotmail.com | skype: adam_j_bradley | w:http://www.identityconcep

Re: timeout after CONNECT, no HELO/EHLO response from clients

fo] timeout after CONNECT from unknown[128.180.2.160] Mar 10 12:17:31 pmx4 postfix/smtpd[25758]: [ID 197553 mail.info] disconnect from unknown[128.180.2.160] Adam N. Copeland wrote, On 3/10/11 10:32 AM: > Yes, that time out setting is still definitely the default. > > Snoop is basic

Re: timeout after CONNECT, no HELO/EHLO response from clients

Yes, that time out setting is still definitely the default. Snoop is basically Solaris' native version of tcp dump, and shouldn't be putting the packets out of order when capturing. Maybe the client is making more than one connection attempt? The part that made me suspect my server is that the sa

timeout after CONNECT, no HELO/EHLO response from clients

Seeing a problem with inbound delivery from relays. Incoming client connections are timing out, but I'm able to telnet to port 25 on my host and immediately get the 220 banner every time. Sometimes the connection times out before the 220 banner is displayed, sometimes it doesn't and the client neve

RE: virtual_alias_maps and X-Original-To

ient_access: > u...@example.com PREPEND: X-Original-To: usern...@example.com >> Wietse Just wanted to say thank you for the info. It turned out I needed "PREPEND" not "PREPEND:" (so, without the colon) - perhaps a different version or something, but it works! Thanks,adam

RE: virtual_alias_maps and X-Original-To

r this alias is to forward to one address, would it be possible to do a simpler approach?  Regards, adam

RE: virtual_alias_maps and X-Original-To

> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 05:03:04PM +0000, Adam Hamer wrote: > > > I have an entry in the virtual_alias_maps for a few users to be > > redirected to zendesk.com. zendesk requires a X-Original-To header set > > for some stuff to work, but it isn't added in my postfix

virtual_alias_maps and X-Original-To

a common approach. I'd appreciate some guidance on this - I am a newbie trying hard not to get too lost... Regards,adam

Re: OT Gmail

On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 08:19 -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote: > You can use their product if you like, but if you value security and > privacy you won't. I can't fathom why anyone would trust their > private data to a data mining company. I just don't get it. Nothing > is free. I don't know why so m

Re: Postfix, POP/IMAP server, virtual users, web administration - what do you use?

On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 00:15 +0200, mouss wrote: > Le 27/09/2010 13:25, Julien Vehent a écrit : > > On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:06:46 +0200, David Touzeau wrote: > I'm interested in this topic also, if anybody knows an interface that > just doesn't break manual configuration, I'm in ! IMO, so long as s

Re: How to log/archive full outgoing mails including BCC info?

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 21:07 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 09/21/2010 09:01 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote: > >> How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their > >> complete form (all hea

Re: How to log/archive full outgoing mails including BCC info?

On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 11:56 -0700, Yang Zhang wrote: > How do you get Postfix to keep a log of all outgoing mails, in their > complete form (all headers + payload) as received from clients? You can't. [Typically someone on this list will chime in that doing so is trivial if you just read the docs

Re: Rules on incoming email

On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 18:11 +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > I have this email client that takes care of distrubition of email to > different mail folders. > As I now started to read my email with a mobile phone, there is a load > of messages that aren't sorted, as my 'home client' hasn't taken care

Re: Postfix integration: Oracle or LDAP?

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 20:13 +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote: > On 08/25/2010 03:17 PM, Zhou, Yan wrote: > > Hi there, > > We want to implement SMTP authentication in Postfix and support multiple > > virtual domains. Rather than having user/domain/endpoint in different > > files, we prefer them either i

Re: Migrating from sendmail, a few questions...

On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 13:04 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Jean-Yves Avenard: > > smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes > > smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes > > smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous, noplaintext > > smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = noanonymous > If this does not announce the SASL m

Re: Migrating from sendmail, a few questions...

On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 22:56 +1000, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > Hi there. > Moving from sendmail to a macos 10.6 server that ships with postfix.. > There are a few things that I'm trying to replicate from sendmail into > postifx, but I'm not having much luck. > Problems: > 2- When using a non encrypt

Re: Baffled by "User unknown in virtual alias table"

On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:51 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams: > > virtual_alias_maps: ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-delivery.cf(0,lock|fold_fix): > > adam.t.willi...@example.com = ot...@example.com > > As DOCUMENTED, virtual alias domains MUST replace the re

Baffled by "User unknown in virtual alias table"

I have a working Postfix server, and I copied the configuration files over to another box with the exact same version(s) to do some testing. But right away the box won't deliver messages to virtual domains, it always says "User unknown in virtual alias table". After what looks like a successful lo

Re: Postfix with PostgreSQL backend - number of connections to the database issue

ill probably solve my problem. Thanks! - -- Adam PAPAI NETIDEA Informatikai Szolgáltató Kft. http://www.netidea.hu E-mail: w...@wooh.hu Phone: +36 30 33-55-735 (Hungary) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmai

Postfix with PostgreSQL backend - number of connections to the database issue

mention any part of this issue. Thanks in advance, - -- Adam PAPAI BSD Support Service http://www.wooh.hu E-mail: w...@wooh.hu Phone: +36 30 33-55-735 (Hungary) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http:/

Re: How to accept email from unknown servers

ons you need > to make sure to use your whitelist in each section and > understand the interaction between the sections. Thanks Noel, I thought that would be the reason but wanted to make sure my understanding was correct. -- Sincerely, Adam Lanier Voyant Strategies Inc.

Re: How to accept email from unknown servers

/helo/sender restrictions will not happen until the RCPT TO command anyway. If you had checks in smtpd_client_restrictions wouldn't they still be evaulated prior to checks in smtpd_recipient_restrictions? What's the advantage of having all checks in smtpd_recipient_restrictions? Sorry, th

Re: Suppress "Command died with status 1" in Pipe transport

verify any advanced settings with your system administrator." People don't assume they messed up an address, instead they assume something is wrong on this end. Anyway, have a great weekend. Thanks, Adam On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Adam: >> Good Mor

Suppress "Command died with status 1" in Pipe transport

was a problem because of the "Command died" message. Any input on this would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, Adam

sanity check

I've inherited a relatively large Postfix installation. Servers have a range of Postfix versions from 2.1.1 to 2.6.5. Master.cf and main.cf are included below. The inbound mail gateways are connected to the internet behind a load-balancing switch. The majority of the inbound mail traffic is

Re: Missing X-UID on new server

My apologies, I must have missed something in the Dovecot configs. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction! On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > Adam Tucker wrote: >> >> I recently installed and configured postfix on a new server that will >> be replacin

Missing X-UID on new server

: RO I would like all the messages on the new server to have at least the X-UID header. What did I miss? Thanks, Adam

Re: How to encrypt email?

cmail and calling "custom encryption script/program" from ~/.procmailrc. *BUT* system administrator (root) can get access to email before it is encrypted so MUA-MUA (sender's email client-recipient's email client) encryption it much safer/secure. -- [pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Ad

Re: milter protocol

ation detail" and (AFAIK) it has never been *officially* documented. One of milter *protocol* documentation is available in pmilter project (pure perl milter) http://pmilter.sourceforge.net/ If you want "milter API" documentation for milter developers than look into documentation pro

Re: Can't fix "Untrusted TLS connection established"

7;t see any warning or error in the log file. Shouldn't the postfix client be checking the server certificate against the local trusted CA? Adam

Can't fix "Untrusted TLS connection established"

I'm running postfix on server and client, forcing TLS on both. No matter what I do, I can't seem to solve "Untrusted TLS connection established to [...]:587: TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)" warning messages in the client log file. Aside from those warnings, mail delivery actua

Re: how to block emails in unwanted language?

of > koi8-r, but obviously does not help to filter those. Very good point. -- [pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu : a...@xl.wp.pl Man has made his bedlam; let him lie in it. -- Fred Allen

Re: Different Postfix master.cf entry depending on outgoing domain.

> if you mean the recipient domain, then no, unless you want to run > multiple postfix instances. > > do whatever you want in the filter. > Sorry if I'm using the terms incorrectly... I mean from my end, I'd like to run multiple interfaces in the master.cf and send mail to through different ones

Different Postfix master.cf entry depending on outgoing domain.

rstand the argument against this crap, I only have so much input...) My postfix config is very vanilla (distro provided, Mandriva 2009), but I can post my master.cf (and postconf -n) if necessary. Thank you. ADAM

Re: Which FileSystem do you use on your postfix server?

> > I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but > > have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different, > > also I would ask you... > > Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver? > > I'm going to migrate a mailserver with EXT3 (and qmail) t

Re: Out Of Office Utility

On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 09:51 -0400, Carlos Williams wrote: > I had a user ask me if the Postfix email server can auto respond w/ > "Out of Office" reply rather than do this on his client in case his > machine is rebooted and or shut off. I Google'd this first and found a > program called "Vacation"

Re: recipient bcc maps

On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 12:11 -0400, Jeff wrote: > > Jeff wrote: > >> I have recipient_bcc_maps set up and configured correctly on a per-user > >> basis: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> How would I do this for an entire domain? Would it be: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>

Problem with postfix when setting up a loopback interface for load balancing

I have some mail servers running postfix on FreeBSD that I am trying to configure to work with a load balancer. I need to configure the lo0 loopback interface to use the IP address the load balancer will be handling for this group of mail servers. Also I need to turn off ARP on the interface to k

Problem with postfix when setting up a loopback interface for load balancing

I have some mail servers running postfix on FreeBSD that I am trying to configure to work with a load balancer. I need to configure the lo0 loopback interface to use the IP address the load balancer will be handling for this group of mail servers. Also I need to turn off ARP on the interface to k

Re: Mail Archiving

> > This list > > as > > well as a simple test of sending an e-mail with a BCC: and looking in > > the archive (message in archive has no BCC). > That's about always_bcc. > >> Hint: recipient_bcc_maps operates on the message envelope

Re: Mail Archiving

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 18:49 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams: > > On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:07 -0700, Chris St Denis wrote: > > > James wrote: > > > > I was wondering if anyone here knew of a good way to duplicate emails > > > > for archi

Re: Mail Archiving

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:07 -0700, Chris St Denis wrote: > James wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone here knew of a good way to duplicate emails > > for archival purposes. > > What i want to do is use a gateway machine that will deliver mail to > > two machines. > > one being an active imap/pop3

Re: moveing to postfix from qmail setup

> > i think you had better use "google apps" instead of postfix ;; > some of us still consider mail to be private ;-p Ditto.

Re: Postfix setup with no true domain just a no-ip/dyndns address?

replies, while other people wouldn't. On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Adam McCarthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So would I just tell no-ip.org (seperate from DynDNS as fair as I > know, but they also have MX records.), to just put in my address or > would I just throw in my IS

Re: Postfix setup with no true domain just a no-ip/dyndns address?

reject your mail if you do not have a valid PTR record > for your IP address. By default your ISP will probably have one, but it > won't resolve to mymachine.no-ip.org which may cause the delivery problem > mentioned before. > > > J.P. > > Adam McCarthy wrote: >>

Postfix setup with no true domain just a no-ip/dyndns address?

I have looked for a guide on the Internet on how to do this but I have never found one. I am wishing to run a request tracker (RT) and need postfix. Now I already have the email coming in, sent to RT by fetch mail of a gmail account. Now how can I make it so that postfix sends replies and other

Re: ldap_README postfix docs

On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:40 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I´m replacing mysql with ldap in my postfix mail server hosting virtual > domains. > > postfix 2.3.8, openldap 2.3.30 (debian etch) > > mail delivery works for virtual domains + virtual mailboxes, i´m having > trouble with vir

Re: Exchange/LDAP Lookups?

> We run Postfix in front of an Exchange 2003 box. I currently run a cron > job every hour to pull a list of valid email addresses of users (and all > associated aliases) and Public Folder email addresses down from the > Exchange box. > Whilst we don't add/remove addresses terribly often, it's a g

Re: Proposing postfix to mgmt as an Exchange replacement

> I just couldn't avoid reading this post. > I actually make a live out of replacing MS solutions with Open > Source-based solutions. I know, it is not perfect, and there are some > features that you will not get, but in my experience these features > are not used very often. > Anyway, I would giv

Re: Proposing postfix to mgmt as an Exchange replacement

The below isn't meant to shoot down your idea, but I'm an Open Source groupware developer and am very familiar with the Exchange-vs-XYZ equation. > As per the subject, I am about to pitch the idea of dumping Exchange > and moving to Postfix. From what I can observe, the Calendar and > Meeting fun

  1   2   >