. No
matter what header does internal mails contain, I want them delivered
via lmtp itself.
I'm sorry for the inconvenience caused by dividing text among two
mails. This is really bad but I am still dying to find the solution to
this. Hope to see a reply soon.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:49 PM
1.com to
A1.com or A1.com to A2.com, they're lmtp'ed directly on postfix-INT itself.
(This is done to save bandwidth)
Sorry for wrong info in previous mail, I was trying to be as quick as
possible to catch you while you're online.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Abhijeet Rastogi
Thanks for replying. Please see my answers inline.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Abhijeet Rastogi:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Some info before starting:
> >
> > a. There are two postfix instances on two different boxes. One (named
> > P
4-8 If the mail is external mail, what's the way to decide the
transport depending upon the milter_header L3 that was added. How to
achieve this?
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
pam system
stops performing for some odd reason.
Thanks for the help.
>
> Wietse
>
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
same "smtp service". Is there a
possibility where I can change the smtp service while retrying for a
already deferred mail?
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Abhijeet Rastogi:
> > Hi Wietse,
> >
> > Thanks for you reply. I may be wron
s (ip addresses) are tried in one go before actually
deferring a mail?
Thanks in advance.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Abhijeet Rastogi:
> > The issue is, why does postfix retry the second time instantly (within 1
> > sec)? Shouldn't postfix wait t
:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:16:15PM +0530, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > 1. If a mail is temporarily deferred from a remote MTA, postfix should
> > back-off instantly for some time but I observed this today.
> >
> > Jul 24 06:40:16 server.name p
s, is there a way I can change this behaviour?
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
't use always_bcc)
but I want it to be scanned via two different spam solutions.
Can anyone guide me as to how do I proceed? What are the possible ways to
achieve this? Thanks
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
ich will be re-read on every
> request. Look for "lfile" or "ltable" at http://www.postfwd.org/doc.**
> html#files <http://www.postfwd.org/doc.html#files>
>
> id=IPBLOCK
> client_address=lfile:/some/**file
> action=REJECT Your ip address has been blocked
>
>
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
also.
For now, my postfix instance supports these lookup tables.
$ postconf -c /etc/postfix -m
btree
cidr
environ
hash
internal
nis
pcre
pgsql
proxy
regexp
static
tcp
texthash
unix
None of them is a database that's light like Redis and supports
master-slave configuration. Can you sugges
ote:
>
> Hi Abhijeet,
>
> you might be interested in DMARC, a relatively new technique that tries
> to do what you want: attach validation rules based on the From header.
>
> See dmarc.org for details.
>
>
> Tom
>
> On 05/07/2013 05:06 PM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
e kind of mails (for ex, adding POSSIBLE
SPAM in subject etc), that would be awesome too. I'm trying to not
write a milter for this though.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 5/7/2013 8:54 AM, Abhijeet Rastogi wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> So, I've a
eople can exploit this thing to send mails from say,
"ad...@paypal.com" and fool users. In Gmail, they handle this kind of
thing by showing "via" thing when viewing the mail.
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
will be missed. If I add it at the bottom, there is a
possibility that it'll never be matched.
So, what exactly is the solution now? My sole requirement is getting
"queueid", "from" and "to" in the same log line. Getting other headers
is just a secondary thing.
On Tu
"/^to:/" in check_headers. Because there won't
be a message which won't contain "to" header. But, I'm not comfortable
with doing that because then I'll have duplicate information in one
line. ("to" header's value will come two times)
On Tu
hat I want but it also adds other stuff like "proto", "helo"
etc which I don't want. I want logs to be as clean as possible. Is
there a way I can accomplish this?
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
C++ coder.
>
> In brief, a continuous effort is needed as usual.
>
> *NOTE: I've removed the attached screenshot because e-mail size is
> limited to 4 characters.*
>
> Thanks for your attention
>
> Best regards,
> Nicolas
>
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
http://blog.abhijeetr.com
requirement. What is the
> best way for this
>
>
> Thanks
> Ram
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi)
https://plus.google.com/107316377741966576356/
21 matches
Mail list logo
