On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 06:37:38PM +0100, Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Since I use virtual mailboxes using MySQL, I would have to include the
> support.
Sure, include what you need.
> Would my customisation for the bash script be correct in this case?
>
> #! /bin/sh
> PFIX=/op
Petko Manolov skrev den 2025-03-09 11:23:
On 25-03-09 10:29:51, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Petko Manolov via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-03-09 08:39:
https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/192.168.234.2.html
damm i missed it rfc1918, ups
Are you saying that the lookup failed (effe
Hello Viktor!
Once again I would like to thank you for your comprehensive and detailed
explanation.
Since I use virtual mailboxes using MySQL, I would have to include the
support. And it is correct that I would use the system OpenSSL version.
Would my customisation for the bash script be co
On 25-03-09 11:09:32, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 2025-03-09 at 03:39:30 UTC-0400 (Sun, 9 Mar 2025 09:39:30 +0200)
> Petko Manolov via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > I've recently signed up for Spamhaus' free service. They were helpful
> > enough to provide postfix se
On 2025-03-09 at 12:22:51 UTC-0400 (Sun, 9 Mar 2025 17:22:51 +0100)
Michael Grimm via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> Review
>> https://docs.spamhaus.com/datasets/docs/source/40-real-world-usage/PublicMirrors/MTAs/020-Postfix.html#configuration.
Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> Review
> https://docs.spamhaus.com/datasets/docs/source/40-real-world-usage/PublicMirrors/MTAs/020-Postfix.html#configuration.
> It provides the correct Postfix config, which does not include checking ZRD
> and DBL in postscreen.
https://docs.spamhaus.com/
On 2025-03-09 at 03:39:30 UTC-0400 (Sun, 9 Mar 2025 09:39:30 +0200)
Petko Manolov via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> I've recently signed up for Spamhaus' free service. They were helpful enough
> to
> provide postfix setup guide to minimize the pain.
Which you failed to follow.
> I'
On 2025-03-09 at 06:23:19 UTC-0400 (Sun, 9 Mar 2025 12:23:19 +0200)
Petko Manolov via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Yeah, don't care about that. I bet plenty of those are floating around for
> those who want to fish for them.
You may find yourself unable to use it, if it starts being
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 09:54:29AM +0100, Andreas Kuhlen via Postfix-users
wrote:
> But before I get to that point, I guess I
> need to make more detailed plans about which features I compile postfix
> with. STARTTLS, MySQL and SASL authentication come to mind. I don't really
> know what else is
On 25-03-09 09:42:46, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
> Dnia 9.03.2025 o godz. 09:23:48 Petko Manolov via Postfix-users pisze:
> > Well, one very important property of authenticity is trust.
> >
> > If a message falsely claim it originates from certain domain and then DKIM
> > fail, i very
Dnia 9.03.2025 o godz. 09:23:48 Petko Manolov via Postfix-users pisze:
> Well, one very important property of authenticity is trust.
>
> If a message falsely claim it originates from certain domain and then DKIM
> fail,
> i very much don't want to receive, let alone read, this message. Right?
On 25-03-09 10:29:51, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
> Petko Manolov via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-03-09 08:39:
>
> > I had to remove zrd.dq.spamhaus.net from postscreen_dnsbl_sites so i can
> > continue to spam you guys with my moronic questions. :)
>
> now that you did disclose your
On 25-03-09 10:42:04, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
> Petko Manolov via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-03-09 08:23:
>
> > If a message falsely claim it originates from certain domain and then DKIM
> > fail, i very much don't want to receive, let alone read, this message.
> > Right?
>
> th
Petko Manolov via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-03-09 08:23:
If a message falsely claim it originates from certain domain and then
DKIM fail,
i very much don't want to receive, let alone read, this message.
Right?
this is still not a job for dkim to reject, if you want to reject its
better d
Petko Manolov via Postfix-users skrev den 2025-03-09 08:39:
I had to remove zrd.dq.spamhaus.net from postscreen_dnsbl_sites so i
can
continue to spam you guys with my moronic questions. :)
now that you did disclose your dqs key is it possible to see
postconf -nf
i did an "dig pvv7qvcjnfkjeb
I've recently signed up for Spamhaus' free service. They were helpful enough to
provide postfix setup guide to minimize the pain. I've modified
postscreen_dnsbl_sites accordingly and this morning was greeted by the following
BS...
Mar 09 01:49:12 lan postfix/postscreen[182934]: CONNECT from
[45
Hi Viktor!
Thank you for the explanation. But before I get to that point, I guess I
need to make more detailed plans about which features I compile postfix
with. STARTTLS, MySQL and SASL authentication come to mind. I don't
really know what else is useful/required. Then it also depends on
whe
Dnia 9.03.2025 o godz. 08:50:17 Petko Manolov via Postfix-users pisze:
> Well, i maybe seeing only in black and white, but if somebody is careless
> enough
> to not set SPF and DKIM, they pretty much asked for it. These mechanisms are
> in
> place to help fighting spam, after all.
No. The goal
18 matches
Mail list logo
