[pfx] Re: Searching for old Postfix 2.0.6 RPM-packaged for Red Hat 6.2 (classic)

2025-01-29 Thread Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
> RHEL 6.2 came with Postfix 2.6.6, not 2.0.6 and you can get a copy from > CentOS vault: No, the question was about "Red Hat Linux", not "Red Hat Enterprise Linux". "Red Hat 6.2" was released long ago in the year 2000. When dealing with such old systems a copy of the cdrom images is helpful in

[pfx] Re: SELinux silently breaking Postfix settings

2025-01-29 Thread Thomas Cameron via Postfix-users
On 1/29/25 6:50 PM, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 30/01/25 12:00, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: If you can get them to address the root cause problem: failing syscalls without proper logging why) then people could fix these problem themselves (as the saying goes, "teach a human to f

[pfx] Re: Searching for old Postfix 2.0.6 RPM-packaged for Red Hat 6.2 (classic)

2025-01-29 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 30/01/25 15:11, Peter via Postfix-users wrote: On 30/01/25 11:34, Josh Good via Postfix-users wrote: Hello all. Due to reasons which are best left untold, I am setting up a Red Hat 6.2 (classic edition) machine. This system comes with Sendmail 8.9.3, and it mainly works just fine. However,

[pfx] Re: Searching for old Postfix 2.0.6 RPM-packaged for Red Hat 6.2 (classic)

2025-01-29 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 30/01/25 11:34, Josh Good via Postfix-users wrote: Hello all. Due to reasons which are best left untold, I am setting up a Red Hat 6.2 (classic edition) machine. This system comes with Sendmail 8.9.3, and it mainly works just fine. However, I was looking for some old Postfix RPM package sui

[pfx] Re: SELinux silently breaking Postfix settings

2025-01-29 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 30/01/25 12:00, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: If you can get them to address the root cause problem: failing syscalls without proper logging why) then people could fix these problem themselves (as the saying goes, "teach a human to fish"). Except for the very rare case of dontaudit

[pfx] Re: SELinux silently breaking Postfix settings

2025-01-29 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Thomas Cameron via Postfix-users: > Wietse - > > I know a little about SELinux. This is me: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WOKRaM-HI4 (Security-Enhanced Linux for > mere mortals on the Red Hat Summit YouTube channel). > > If you (or anyone) is running into SELinux problems, I am more than

[pfx] Re: Searching for old Postfix 2.0.6 RPM-packaged for Red Hat 6.2 (classic)

2025-01-29 Thread Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
> So I am posting here, to ask whether someone has in his archives an RPM > package of Postfix targeted to Red Hat 6.2 (classic edition)? Try to download and mount the ISO(s). Those included RPM packages back then. https://archive.org/details/disc1_202002 The source seems legit, but use at you

[pfx] Searching for old Postfix 2.0.6 RPM-packaged for Red Hat 6.2 (classic)

2025-01-29 Thread Josh Good via Postfix-users
Hello all. Due to reasons which are best left untold, I am setting up a Red Hat 6.2 (classic edition) machine. This system comes with Sendmail 8.9.3, and it mainly works just fine. However, I was looking for some old Postfix RPM package suitable for RH6.2-classic, in order to replace its ugly Se

[pfx] Re: SELinux silently breaking Postfix settings

2025-01-29 Thread Thomas Cameron via Postfix-users
Wietse - I know a little about SELinux. This is me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WOKRaM-HI4 (Security-Enhanced Linux for mere mortals on the Red Hat Summit YouTube channel). If you (or anyone) is running into SELinux problems, I am more than happy to facilitate any bug reports (think add

[pfx] SELinux silently breaking Postfix settings

2025-01-29 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
There are more than a few places in the file system where Postfix meets the non-Postfix world. This is what I came up with in a few minutes. - Pathnames in $forward_path (pathnames for .forward files for UNIX system accounts). These are accessed while impersonating a recipient. - Pathnames, comma

[pfx] Re: maillog_file Setting Breaks SELinux on RHEL

2025-01-29 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2025-01-28 at 18:43:50 UTC-0500 (Tue, 28 Jan 2025 17:43:50 -0600) E R via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 1:34 AM Michael Tokarev via Postfix-users wrote: [...] The only place for such documentation addition is the Postfix's readme file(s), mentioning how to