People who actually use Dovecot for submission might know.
I'm not even sure whether Dovecot's submission facility ever talks to
Postfix.
Dovecot doesn't "perform" submission services. It is only a proxy to postfix
submission (or other).
https://doc.dovecot.org/2.3/admin_manual/submissi
Le 04/11/2024 à 17:05, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users a écrit :
Yvan Masson via Postfix-users:
Hi list,
I have a Postfix 3.7.11 server configured with the following lines:
smtpd_milters = inet:xx.xx.xx.xx:9900
milter_default_action = quarantine
When the milter server is unavailable, incomin
Hello,
And IF dovecot is the best angle of attack, I do not know.
Neither do I. People who actually use Dovecot for submission might know.
See below. Apparently I was imprecise in the formulation who does submission
listening/receiving. Its pf.
Maybe some kind of policy driven solu
On 2024-11-05 at 13:17:11 UTC-0500 (Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:17:11 +0100)
Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
I have a postfix 3.10 installation up & running. Postfix and
dovecot handle mail reception from the inet, dovecot/587 users
sending to the local domains or into th
I have a postfix 3.10 installation up & running. Postfix and dovecot handle
mail reception from the inet, dovecot/587 users sending to the local domains or
into the internet.
Is there a possibility of having some kind of "local" restriction for a
specific (or a set of) local users (com
On 2024-11-05 at 10:58:27 UTC-0500 (Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:58:27 +0100)
Florian Piekert via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello Postfix Users!
I have a postfix 3.10 installation up & running. Postfix and dovecot
handle mail reception from the inet, dovecot/587 users sending to the
local
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> >Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
> >> When processing logs I have noticed that some queue IDs get reported by
> >> smtpd when DATA phase starts, but when connection is lost, those IDs aren't
> >> reported as lost.
> >>
> >> Example:
> >>
> >> Se
Hello Postfix Users!
I have a postfix 3.10 installation up & running. Postfix and dovecot handle
mail reception from the inet, dovecot/587 users sending to the local domains or
into the internet.
Is there a possibility of having some kind of "local" restriction for a
specific (or a set of) lo
On 2024-11-04 at 07:23:37 UTC-0500 (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 20:23:37 +0800)
Adriel via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hello
say i have a subdomain sub.xyz.com.
if I make a CNAME as,
sub.xyz.com CNAME to xyz.net
and, xyz.net has its own MX and SPF records.
my question is, for this DNS setu
Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users:
> Since you're creating the queue ID only after `RCPT TO`, we have the
> sender's and the main recipient's address at hand - that would be enough
> to set up something like a `queue_id_prefix_map` :-)
First, the queue ID is not the place for this information. T
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 08:23:37PM +0800, Adriel via Postfix-users wrote:
> say i have a subdomain sub.xyz.com.
>
> if I make a CNAME as,
>
> sub.xyz.com CNAME to xyz.net
A CNAME redirects *all* RRsets for a given owner name other than
(DNSSEC) RRSIG and NSEC. So MX and TXT records, ... will b
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:19:20PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via
Postfix-users wrote:
> > > Sep 2 16:51:11 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[3697]: connect from
> > > a.b.t-com.sk[178.41.x.y]
> > > Sep 2 16:51:11 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[3697]: 4WyBXH6Dp7z6C7g:
> > > client=a.b.t-com.sk[178.41.x.y
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 12:46:42PM +0100, Thomas Landauer via Postfix-users
wrote:
> A detail first:
> At http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_delay_open_until_valid_rcpt
> please change "mail transaction ID" to "queue ID" for consistency here:
> > The downside is that rejected recipients
Hi,
thanks!
A detail first:
At
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_delay_open_until_valid_rcpt
please change "mail transaction ID" to "queue ID" for consistency here:
The downside is that rejected recipients are logged with NOQUEUE instead of a
mail transaction ID.
Viktor's logfil
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
When processing logs I have noticed that some queue IDs get reported by
smtpd when DATA phase starts, but when connection is lost, those IDs aren't
reported as lost.
Example:
Sep 2 16:51:11 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[3697]: connect from
a.b.t-com.sk[178
15 matches
Mail list logo
