Alex via Postfix-users:
> Hi,
> I'm using postfix-3.8.5 on fedora40 and having a problem with forwarding
> mail from our relay to gmail recipients. We have some users using
> ~/.forward files to individual gmail accounts. Obviously not ideal, but I
> hoped openarc could help alleviate some of those
Hi,
I'm using postfix-3.8.5 on fedora40 and having a problem with forwarding
mail from our relay to gmail recipients. We have some users using
~/.forward files to individual gmail accounts. Obviously not ideal, but I
hoped openarc could help alleviate some of those problems.
Aug 3 17:01:48 cipher
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Arnie T via Postfix-users:
> > main.cf:
> > var_SHDQS=xxx
> > postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map =
> > texthash:/etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
> >
> > cat /etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
> > ${var_SHDQS}.zen.dq.spamhaus.ne
Arnie T via Postfix-users:
> main.cf:
> var_SHDQS=xxx
> postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map =
> texthash:/etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
>
> cat /etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
> ${var_SHDQS}.zen.dq.spamhaus.net=127.0.0.[2..11] 554
> $rbl_class $rbl
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> You need to use the same table for both smtpd(8) and postscreen(8).
> That is:
>
> rbl_reply_maps = ... some table ...
> postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map = ... same table ...
>
> And of course that table needs to match all the applicable keys.
This is impor
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 04:54:57PM +, Arnie T via Postfix-users wrote:
> > > It looks like it's using the "default_rbl_reply" instead of the match
> > > from "postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map".
> >
> > That parameter is not applicable for connections passed to smtpd(8).
>
> I'm not clear on that.
Hello,
> Why empty unless under stress???
I've no idea yet. I hadn't gotten that far. Was starting with 'first contact'
-- at postscreen -- and working inwards.
> > cat /etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
> Only used by postscreen(8).!
> This was not blocked by postscreen(8) and so was h
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 04:23:33PM +, Arnie T via Postfix-users wrote:
> postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map =
> texthash:/etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
> >>> rbl_reply_maps =
> ${stress?lmdb:/etc/postfix/smtpd_dnsbl_reply_maps}
> default_rbl_reply = $rb
Hello,
I am working on upgrading an old and pretty broken Postfix setup I inherited.
I managed to get it cleaned up, and running on Postfix v3.9.
The server's using Spamhaus DQS dnsbls @ postscreen, and the policy it uses is
reject on match.
They're working like they should for postscreen, reje
On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 10:54:46AM -0400, John Thorvald Wodder II via
Postfix-users wrote:
> > maybe this header_checks example works :
> > /^(To|From|Cc|Reply-To):.*@stupidspammers\.example/ DISCARD
> > postmap /etc/postfix/header_checks
> > and in main.cf :
> > header_checks = regexp:/etc/p
On Jul 30, 2024, at 16:52, Dimitris T. via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> not sure why you don't just block the ip/subnet of that client in firewall
> (?) or just try postscreen + postscreen_access_list with client ip/subnet..
I wouldn't expect IP-based blocking to work for long, as servers can cha
On Jul 31, 2024, at 06:05, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> Dnia 30.07.2024 o godz. 16:19:01 John Thorvald Wodder II via Postfix-users
> pisze:
>> The "access" file currently contains REJECT lines for both
>> "spamgateway.nil" (no leading period) and ".spamgateway.nil" (leading
>> per
12 matches
Mail list logo
