* Gary R. Schmidt via Postfix-users :
> Hmm, I was able to probe it using smtp2go, so I thought I'd see what telnet
> does for me here in Oz...
So was I (from charite.de), but not from list.sys4.de
There must be some selective blocking in place!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abtei
On 30/07/2024 15:31, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users :
however i dont get a message from the mail list and checking syslog shows
there was no contact to the server ?
4WY0w161l3z1018 1994 Tue Jul 30 05:24:49 postfix-users-boun...@postfix.org
* Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users :
> > however i dont get a message from the mail list and checking syslog shows
> > there was no contact to the server ?
>
> 4WY0w161l3z1018 1994 Tue Jul 30 05:24:49
> postfix-users-boun...@postfix.org
>(connect to mail.philfixit.com.au[203.45.14
> however i dont get a message from the mail list and checking syslog shows
> there was no contact to the server ?
4WY0w161l3z1018 1994 Tue Jul 30 05:24:49 postfix-users-boun...@postfix.org
(connect to mail.philfixit.com.au[203.45.14.55]:25: Connection refused)
On 30/07/24 15:29, Phil Steel-Wilson via Postfix-users wrote:
I was subscribed fro many years under p...@philfixit.info but now i want
to use p...@philfixit.com.au which i dutifully entered into the form at
https://list.sys4.de/postorius/lists/postfix-users.postfix.org/
however i dont get a me
Thanks Victor,
I was subscribed fro many years under p...@philfixit.info but now i want
to use p...@philfixit.com.au which i dutifully entered into the form at
https://list.sys4.de/postorius/lists/postfix-users.postfix.org/
however i dont get a message from the mail list and checking syslog
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 01:14:15PM +1000, Phil Steel-Wilson via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Copy and paste from the email gave top...@philfixit.info however the email
> address is actually p...@philfixit.info and i can send and receive mail to
> google . . . Cheers Phil
Eliding essential spaces from
Copy and paste from the email gave top...@philfixit.info however the
email address is actually p...@philfixit.info and i can send and receive
mail to google . . . Cheers Phil
On 30/07/2024 12:53 pm, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:23:43PM +1000, Phil Ste
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:23:43PM +1000, Phil Steel-Wilson via Postfix-users
wrote:
> because it has received a number of bounces indicating that there may
> be a problem delivering messages top...@philfixit.info.
Trying "sendmail -bv top...@philfixit.info" to verifying your address, I see:
On
Hi All,
As per subject, when i moved to a new box with ubuntu 2004 on it i got this
Your subscription for Postfix-users mailing list has been disabled
Your subscription has been disabled on thepostfix-us...@postfix.org mailing
list
because it has received a number of bounces indicating that t
export--- via Postfix-users:
> Here is my Main.cf file ( I deleted only my network details).
For better support:
- Output from the command "postconf -nf"
- Output from the command "postconf -Mf"
- Postfix logging for the failing delivery.
You can edit email addresses and IP addresses, but m
On 7/28/24 20:59, Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users wrote:
How do folks monitor the health of their postfix installations?
I am using https://github.com/kumina/postfix_exporter for metrics collection
and to spot anomalies if there are any. But it is definitely not a silver
bullet, I am intere
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 10:21:22AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:48:42PM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Isn't there any possibility to use a dedicated transport to such a broken
> > >
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:48:42PM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > Isn't there any possibility to use a dedicated transport to such a broken
> > server, with settings that force use of TLS to deliver the message
> > regardless of target s
Dnia 29.07.2024 o godz. 16:15:32 export--- via Postfix-users pisze:
> Thank you ALL for replies.
>
> I added
> smtpd_tls_security_level = may
>
> but still the same.
You should use "smtp_tls_security_level", not "smtpd_tls_security_level".
> # TLS parameters
> smtpd_tls_security_level = may
> s
Dnia 30.07.2024 o godz. 00:00:58 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> No, because the servers in question not only don't offer STARTTLS in
> EHLO, but also refuse STARTTLS if you try. There aren't many such
> systems, but they exist.
Then they can't accept mail at all? If they reject pla
Thank you ALL for replies.
I added
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
but still the same.
Here is my Main.cf file ( I deleted only my network details).
# See /usr/share/postfix/main.cf.dist for a commented, more complete version
#smtp_enforce_tls = yes
# Debian specific: Specifying a file
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 03:48:42PM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
> Isn't there any possibility to use a dedicated transport to such a broken
> server, with settings that force use of TLS to deliver the message
> regardless of target server not advertising it?
No, because the serve
Dnia 29.07.2024 o godz. 22:25:37 Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users pisze:
> It was a response from a remote server refusing to accept delivery,
> so, the fix (if not already in place) is:
>
> smtp_tls_security_level = may
>
> however, the remote server might be one of the broken ones both req
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 08:21:40AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> export--- via Postfix-users:
> > Sent email returns with the error
> >
> > #5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
> >
> > How can I correct that error?
> > Thank you for help
>
export--- via Postfix-users:
> Sent email returns with the error
>
> #5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
>
> How can I correct that error?
> Thank you for help
Assuming that the actual message was:
530 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first
* If t
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 08:27:37PM +0900, Walt E via Postfix-users wrote:
>Hi victor
>I guess outbound TLS support is this option?
>smtp_tls_security_level = may
Oops, yes, you're right of course, I am embarrassed, but happy to be corrected.
--
Viktor.
___
Hi victor
I guess outbound TLS support is this option?
smtp_tls_security_level = may
Thank you.
- 원본 메일 -
보낸사람: Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
받는사람: postfix-users@postfix.org
날짜: 24.07.29 20:22 GMT +0900
제목: [pfx] Re: #5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first (in
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:16:20PM +0200, export--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> Sent email returns with the error
>
> #5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
>
> How can I correct that error?
> Thank you for help
Since you're asking on the posfix-users list, p
Sent email returns with the error
#5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first (in reply to MAIL FROM command)
How can I correct that error?
Thank you for help
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 28.07.24 16:59, Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users wrote:
How do folks monitor the health of their postfix installations?
log monitoring seems to be essential, rates of warning/error messages
seem meaningful. Then there are the statistics regularly emitted, but
these seem more indicative of b
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 05:45:51PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:40:45AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > * Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
> >
> > > > Is this intentional or a side-effect?
> > >
> > > I'm guessing you hav
On 28/07/24 17:58, Walt E via Postfix-users wrote:
Is there any standard that, postmaster@domain is a required account for this
domain?
I asked this is b/c one of our domains has millions of users, and a people
registered the postmaster account (surely it's due to our mistake in work) with
th
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:40:45AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
wrote:
> * Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
>
> > > Is this intentional or a side-effect?
> >
> > I'm guessing you have "smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = yes"?
>
> Yes.
>
> > In that case, this'd be expected.
>
> OK
* Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
> > Is this intentional or a side-effect?
>
> I'm guessing you have "smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender = yes"?
Yes.
> In that case, this'd be expected.
OK! I was just wondering if I missed a reference somewhere in the
docs, since I didn't really see this being
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 09:28:51AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Ever so often I'm using transport entries to bounce typo domains or
> "noreply" addresses prior to the expiration after
> $maximum_queue_lifetime.
>
> Something like:
> noreplytoMMS.telekom.de error:5.1.2 Doe
Hi!
ever so often im using transport entries to bounce typo domains or
"noreply" addresses prio to the expiration after $maximum_queue_lifetime.
Something like:
noreplytoMMS.telekom.de error:5.1.2 Doesn't accept mail
But I noticed that this also causes mails with the sender
domain/address bein
32 matches
Mail list logo
