On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 04:59:48PM -0400, Christophe Kalt via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Finally, what are the various queues?
> https://www.postfix.org/QSHAPE_README.html mentions maildrop, hold,
> incoming, active & deferred,
Which are where you might find a given message.
> but I also see bounce
Hi,
How do folks monitor the health of their postfix installations?
log monitoring seems to be essential, rates of warning/error messages
seem meaningful. Then there are the statistics regularly emitted, but
these seem more indicative of busyness.
Finally, monitoring queue sizes is probably adv
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
wrote:
* Walt E. via Postfix-users:
Is there any standard that, postmaster@domain is a required account
for this domain?
Yes. The requirement has been specified as early as 1981 in RFC 822, and
in its successors up to
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 09:37:19PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, but the chrooted smtpd(8) process reads:
> > >
> > > /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf
> > >
> > > rather than /et
* A. Schulze via Postfix-users:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.1
>
> 5321 btw...
Indeed, that was an unfortunate typo on my end. Thanks, Andreas.
-Ralph
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubsc
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 09:37:19PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, but the chrooted smtpd(8) process reads:
> >
> > /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf
> >
> > rather than /etc/resolv.conf, because that's what chroot jails do.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 09:37:19PM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Yes, but the chrooted smtpd(8) process reads:
>
> /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf
>
> rather than /etc/resolv.conf, because that's what chroot jails do.
>
And the same applies to /etc/hosts, /etc/nsswi
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:00:30AM +, Laura Smith via Postfix-users wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 09:45:45AM +, Laura Smith via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The reporting program is postfix/smtpd
> > >
> > > postconf output:
> > >
> > > smtp inet n - y - - smtpd
> >
> >
>
>
> > I know you're desperately trying to finger point elsewhere but I'm
> > pretty sure you are barking up the wrong tree. Everything else
> > works, apart from postfix.
>
>
> At the risk of demonstrating my level of thick I have seen similar
> messages about "Temporary failure in name reso
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users
wrote:
> * Walt E. via Postfix-users:
>
> > Is there any standard that, postmaster@domain is a required account
> > for this domain?
>
> Yes. The requirement has been specified as early as 1981 in RFC 822, and
> in its su
On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 11:00 +, Laura Smith via Postfix-users wrote:
> I know you're desperately trying to finger point elsewhere but I'm
> pretty sure you are barking up the wrong tree. Everything else
> works, apart from postfix.
At the risk of demonstrating my level of thick I have seen sim
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 09:45:45AM +, Laura Smith via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > The reporting program is postfix/smtpd
> >
> > postconf output:
> >
> > smtp inet n - y - - smtpd
>
>
> It runs in a chroot jail, where likely /etc/resolv.conf or related
> files are different from the ve
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 09:45:45AM +, Laura Smith via Postfix-users wrote:
> The reporting program is postfix/smtpd
>
> postconf output:
>
> smtp inet n - y - - smtpd
It runs in a chroot jail, where likely /etc/resolv.conf or related
files are different
> > But I cannot understand why. Running, e.g. "dig foo.example.com"
> > returns instantly with the IP address, no problems with resolution?
>
>
> Are you typing that command as root? Most Postfix daemons don't.
>
Yes, of course ! dig is a simple command that doesn't require root privilege
Am 28.07.24 um 10:03 schrieb Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users:
Yes. The requirement has been specified as early as 1981 in RFC 822, and
in its successors up to and including RFC 5322.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5321#section-4.5.1
5321 btw...
Andreas
__
* Walt E. via Postfix-users:
> Is there any standard that, postmaster@domain is a required account
> for this domain?
Yes. The requirement has been specified as early as 1981 in RFC 822, and
in its successors up to and including RFC 5322.
-Ralph
___
Po
16 matches
Mail list logo
