Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-06-17 06:49:
I’m hoping I have solved the problem. I have roundcube sending mail on
port 25 with no auth (all daemons are running on the same server), and
it is sending mail. Gmail rejects it, but I’ve altered my spf record to
include localhost. I
> On Jun 17, 2024, at 12:16 AM, Peter via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> On 17/06/24 16:49, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users wrote:
>> On Jun 16, 2024, at 10:30 PM, Peter via Postfix-users
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> It's likely that roundcube is not configured for TLS and postfix is (as it
>>> should
Am 2024-06-17 06:49, schrieb Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
On Jun 16, 2024, at 10:30 PM, Peter via Postfix-users
wrote:
It's likely that roundcube is not configured for TLS and postfix is
(as it should be) configured not to offer AUTH until TLS is
established.
Yes, postfix is configured
On 17/06/2024 11:54, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users wrote:
I’m seeing this error in the roundcube logs:
[16-Jun-2024 20:28:58 -0500]: SMTP Error: Authentication
failure: mail.stovebolt.com
[SNIP]
/var/www/html/webmail/program/lib/Roundcube/rcube.php on line 1794 (POST
/webmail/?_task=mail&
On 17/06/24 16:49, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users wrote:
Gmail rejects it, but I’ve altered my spf record to include localhost. I hope
once that propagates my problems with be solved.
This will not do anythi9ng for you, you cannot put localhost in an SPF
record.
There are many reasons why g
On 17/06/24 16:49, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users wrote:
On Jun 16, 2024, at 10:30 PM, Peter via Postfix-users
wrote:
It's likely that roundcube is not configured for TLS and postfix is (as it
should be) configured not to offer AUTH until TLS is established.
Yes, postfix is configured to
Got it. Thanks Victor very much.
On 2024-06-17 12:18, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 09:54:01AM +0800, Jeff Peng via Postfix-users
wrote:
smtp_use_tls = yes
Obsolete, ignored when the preferred form below is specified.
smtp_tls_security_level = may
Keep
On Jun 16, 2024, at 10:30 PM, Peter via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
>
> It's likely that roundcube is not configured for TLS and postfix is (as it
> should be) configured not to offer AUTH until TLS is established.
>
Yes, postfix is configured to use TLS, and no roundcube is not. When I
configure
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 09:54:01AM +0800, Jeff Peng via Postfix-users wrote:
> smtp_use_tls = yes
Obsolete, ignored when the preferred form below is specified.
> smtp_tls_security_level = may
Keep this one.
> smtpd_use_tls = yes
Obsolete, ignored when the preferred form below is specified.
>
On 17/06/24 13:54, Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users wrote:
I’m seeing this error in the roundcube logs:
[16-Jun-2024 20:28:58 -0500]: SMTP Error: Authentication
failure: mail.stovebolt.com
PIPELINING
SIZE 9
VRFY
ETRN
STARTTLS
ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
8BITMIME
DSN
SMTPUTF8
CHUNKING (Code: 250
I’m seeing this error in the roundcube logs:
[16-Jun-2024 20:28:58 -0500]: SMTP Error: Authentication failure:
mail.stovebolt.com
PIPELINING
SIZE 9
VRFY
ETRN
STARTTLS
ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
8BITMIME
DSN
SMTPUTF8
CHUNKING (Code: 250) in /var/www/html/webmail/program/lib/Roundcube/rcube.php
Hello experts,
for my these settings,
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_tls_security_level = may
smtp_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtp_scache
smtpd_use_tls = yes
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:${data_directory}/smtpd_scache
my questions in
- Did the client connect to port 25 or 578?
578
isn't the port 587?
:)
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
# SMTPd SERVER TLS/SSL Settings
tls_daemon_random_bytes = 64
tls_random_bytes = 64
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/letsencrypt/live/email.broker/fullchain.pem
smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/letsencrypt/live/email.broker/privkey.pem
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes
smtpd_tls_manda
> On Jun 16, 2024, at 5:02 PM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
>> I?m trying to sort out a problem with Roundcube failing to send email with
>> an error message that says SMTP Error(): authentication failed. In the
>> roundcube error log I find this
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 01:41:44PM -0400, John Levine via Postfix-users wrote:
> Turns out it's more complicated than I thought, they want a restricted
> sending address to be able to send only to particular recipients.
> Suggestions?
If the allowed recipients are the same for all restricted send
Hi list.
I am a novice postmaster that started a email server last year.
There is nothing wrong that I can currently tell but I am the only user
and there is only so much that I can test.
Here are my config files, I am curious to know what seasoned postmasters
think.
MAIN.CF--
Paul Schmehl via Postfix-users:
> I?m trying to sort out a problem with Roundcube failing to send email with an
> error message that says SMTP Error(): authentication failed. In the roundcube
> error log I find this:
>
> [16-Jun-2024 13:58:24 -0500]: <5s9tomcd> PHP Error: SMTP server does not
>
I’m trying to sort out a problem with Roundcube failing to send email with an
error message that says SMTP Error(): authentication failed. In the roundcube
error log I find this:
[16-Jun-2024 13:58:24 -0500]: <5s9tomcd> PHP Error: SMTP server does not
support authentication (POST
/webmail/?_ta
John Levine via Postfix-users:
> Turns out it's more complicated than I thought, they want a restricted
> sending address to be able to send only to particular recipients.
> Suggestions?
Here is a non-intuitive solution, based on
https://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html
/etc/postfix/
It appears that Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
said:
If one of recipients wants to accept mail from a sender while another
recipient doesn't, teoretically you can reject that sender at recipient
level, but that complicates configuration (but it's possible).
This would mean that for si
It appears that Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
said:
>If one of recipients wants to accept mail from a sender while another
>recipient doesn't, teoretically you can reject that sender at recipient
>level, but that complicates configuration (but it's possible).
>This would mean that fo
On 6/16/2024 9:06 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
# Don't indent text between IF and ENDIF.
IF /^MAIL FROM:/
/^MAIL FROM:/ QUIT
/^MAIL FROM:/ QUIT
...
ENDIF
Seems like if this is talking to a real MTA this would be a
connection amplifier. The sending MTA would see this as a non-fa
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 10:06:41AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
> > John R. Levine via Postfix-users:
> > > On Sat, 15 Jun 2024, Jeff Peng wrote:
> > > > I think postscreen can block them easily.
> > >
> > > I'm looking at the postscreen man
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 10:06:41AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> John R. Levine via Postfix-users:
> > On Sat, 15 Jun 2024, Jeff Peng wrote:
> > > I think postscreen can block them easily.
> >
> > I'm looking at the postscreen man page and I don't see anything about mail
> > add
John R. Levine via Postfix-users:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2024, Jeff Peng wrote:
> > I think postscreen can block them easily.
>
> I'm looking at the postscreen man page and I don't see anything about mail
> addresses. Am I missing something?
That is a bad suggestion, please ignore.
> I do see smtpd_
John R. Levine via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-06-16 15:18:
I'm looking at the postscreen man page and I don't see anything about
mail addresses. Am I missing something?
postscreen is not smtpd
I do see smtpd_command_filter. How about if I map MAIL FROM:
to QUIT?
so this needs smtpd
mi
On Sat, 15 Jun 2024, Jeff Peng wrote:
I think postscreen can block them easily.
I'm looking at the postscreen man page and I don't see anything about mail
addresses. Am I missing something?
I do see smtpd_command_filter. How about if I map MAIL FROM: to QUIT?
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@t
28 matches
Mail list logo
