FYI: the libmilter interface is an internal communication protocol.
It is NOT publically documented on purpose (hence complaining about
missing documentation is somehow annoying).
--
Please don't Cc: me, use only the list for replies.
___
Postfix-users
Looks like there is sufficient basis to make SMTPD_QUIT_NC rerquests
thts from Postfix. Just need to figure out how to enable/disable
this particular command based on the Postfix and Milter protocol
versions. There is already some 'set' intersection code for doing
such things on the Postfix side.
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tqfyk4qzqzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
|> <4tqc213rcwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|So you're suggesting that as long as an MTA-to Milter connection
|>|is not in an error
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
> Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
> <4tqc213rcwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
> |So you're suggesting that as long as an MTA-to Milter connection
> |is not in an error state, sending
> |
> |SMFIC_QUIT_NC
> |
> |and later sending
> |
> |SM
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20240131203248.XtHi_6Do@steffen%sdaoden.eu>:
|Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
| <4tqc213rcwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
||So you're suggesting that as long as an MTA-to Milter connection
||is not in an error state, sending
||
||SMFIC_QUIT_NC
||
||and
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tqc213rcwzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|So you're suggesting that as long as an MTA-to Milter connection
|is not in an error state, sending
|
|SMFIC_QUIT_NC
|
|and later sending
|
|SMTIC_CONNECT
|
|are sufficient to make a Milter fully f
So you're suggesting that as long as an MTA-to Milter connection
is not in an error state, sending
SMFIC_QUIT_NC
and later sending
SMTIC_CONNECT
are sufficient to make a Milter fully forget a past SMTP session and
to make it ready to handle events from a new SMTP session?
I'd like to
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tq7t76ypkzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Claus Assmann via Postfix-users:
|>> SMFIP_NOQUIT would
|>> be a good protocol extension in general
|>
|> "Use the source, Luke."
|>
|> You mean something like
|> SMFIC_QUIT_NC
|> ?
|
|And... Postfix 'kn
postfix-users@postfix.org wrote in
<20240131155624.ga51...@veps.esmtp.org>:
|> SMFIP_NOQUIT would
|> be a good protocol extension in general
|
|"Use the source, Luke."
|
|You mean something like
|SMFIC_QUIT_NC
|?
I did, i have that symbol (like MDS256..), yes. So maybe, yes.
This is one
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 12:13:51PM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> - The MTA then needs to keep the Milter connection open while watting
> for new work. Once there is work, the MTA sends SMFIC_CONNECT and
> so on.
>
> - This sounds like the MTA needs a Milter connection cache that
Claus Assmann via Postfix-users:
> > SMFIP_NOQUIT would
> > be a good protocol extension in general
>
> "Use the source, Luke."
>
> You mean something like
> SMFIC_QUIT_NC
> ?
And... Postfix 'knows' that constant since postfix-2.5.0, but there
is no code to negotiate or send it.
What would it
Michael Storz via Postfix-users wrote in
<0cf37c59789c8be39a442926261d2...@lrz.de>:
|Am 2024-01-31 15:09, schrieb David Bürgin via Postfix-users:
|> Michael Storz:
|>> FWS = ([*WSP CRLF] 1*WSP) / obs-FWS
|>>
|>> A FWS can be a single WSP or a folded line.
|>>
|>> Therefore
On 2024-01-31 at 10:12:06 UTC-0500 (Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:12:06 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 30.01.24 20:20, Israel britto via Postfix-users wrote:
hello, I'm having a problem with spamhaus that I don't know how to
solve.
Today I have 1 domain that
Jonas Vautherin via Postfix-users:
> > Indeed, RFC 5322 recommends (i.e. should) single space.
A safe change is to change the strftime() call in the Postfix
mail_date() function, so that it uses %d (day-of-month as 01-31)
instead of %e (which replaces the leading 0 with space).
This is not only a
Am 2024-01-31 15:09, schrieb David Bürgin via Postfix-users:
Michael Storz:
FWS = ([*WSP CRLF] 1*WSP) / obs-FWS
A FWS can be a single WSP or a folded line.
Therefore the date "Fri, 5 Jan 2024 16:48:37 -0500 (EST)" is
syntactically incorrect, because there can be only one blank
> SMFIP_NOQUIT would
> be a good protocol extension in general
"Use the source, Luke."
You mean something like
SMFIC_QUIT_NC
?
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 01:00:56PM +0100, Michael Storz via Postfix-users wrote:
> day = ([FWS] 1*2DIGIT FWS) / obs-day
>
> This says a day can consist of one or two digits preceded by an optional
> folding white space (FWS):
>
> FWS = ([*WSP CRLF] 1*WSP) / obs-FWS
>
On 30.01.24 20:20, Israel britto via Postfix-users wrote:
hello, I'm having a problem with spamhaus that I don't know how to
solve.
Today I have 1 domain that uses 2 exclusive IPs 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2
The PTR and rDNS entries are correctly configured:
1.1.1.1 > a1.domain.com
2.2.2.2 > a2.domain.c
On 2024-01-30 at 17:56:16 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 23:56:16 +0100)
Jonas Vautherin via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
My understanding of a "folding white space" from (amongst others)
RFC2822 [3] is
that it implies a carriage return (CRLF), and it is *not* the same
thing as a
white
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4tpmnz1dqyzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Postfix has to be compatible with libmilter, the reference
|implementation from Sendmail. It absolutely makes no sends for me
|to unilaterally add features. If you wish to propose libmilter API
|changes, such as c
On 2024-01-31 at 03:32:20 UTC-0500 (Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:32:20 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 30.01.24 20:20, Israel britto via Postfix-users wrote:
hello, I'm having a problem with spamhaus that I don't know how to
solve.
Today I have 1 domain that
Michael Storz:
> FWS = ([*WSP CRLF] 1*WSP) / obs-FWS
>
> A FWS can be a single WSP or a folded line.
>
> Therefore the date "Fri, 5 Jan 2024 16:48:37 -0500 (EST)" is syntactically
> incorrect, because there can be only one blank between "," and "5", not two
> by the syntax of RF
> No, that is a wrong interpretation: day-of-week, ",", date, time, CFWS
> are all syntatic tokens and [] means optional. The blanks between the
> tokens do not belong to the syntax. If you generate a date-time with all
> optional fields it would be
>
> day-of-week,datetimeCFWS
>
> without any b
Am 2024-01-30 23:56, schrieb Jonas Vautherin via Postfix-users:
...
Received: from mx5 ([15.102.1.34])
by compute1.internal (LMTPProxy); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:48:38 -0500
Received: from mx5.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailmx.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACD7272
> Indeed, RFC 5322 recommends (i.e. should) single space.
Is there a place where it explicitly mentions that for WSP? In section 3.3, it
says that "it is RECOMMENDED that a single space be used in each place that FWS
appears", but I did not find anything about WSP other than this:
```
date-time
On 30.01.24 20:20, Israel britto via Postfix-users wrote:
hello, I'm having a problem with spamhaus that I don't know how to solve.
Today I have 1 domain that uses 2 exclusive IPs 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2
The PTR and rDNS entries are correctly configured:
1.1.1.1 > a1.domain.com
2.2.2.2 > a2.domain.co
26 matches
Mail list logo
