[pfx] Re: milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?

Postfix has to be compatible with libmilter, the reference implementation from Sendmail. It absolutely makes no sends for me to unilaterally add features. If you wish to propose libmilter API changes, such as claimng a code, then this mailing list is not the place to do that. Claus Assmann is on t

[pfx] Re: Are multiple white spaces allowed in a date in headers?

> RFC 5322 is clear that day is 1-2 digits, preceded by optional folding > whitespace. If present, the definition of folding whitespace allows it to be > 1 or more spaces, despite the fact that a single space is recommended. Indeed, RFC 5322 recommends (i.e. should) single space. Postfix date-tim

[pfx] milter: how about a SMFIP_NOQUIT?

Hello. I am currently writing my first ever milter, a yet postfix-only DKIM sign-only one. I want to do "that" (well: actually DKIM, not milter) for years but could not because i had "no I-M-F aka RFC 822/2822/5322 parser of acceptable quality". That has changed (quite a bit), but i will

[pfx] Are multiple white spaces allowed in a date in headers?

Good evening, I am using isync/mbsync to fetch my emails, and throws the following error with Fastmail (that I don't see with others like GMail): > IMAP error: unable to parse INTERNALDATE format With the verbose output, I get: > * 66 FETCH (UID 74 INTERNALDATE " 5-Dec-2023 08:02:58 -0500" BODY

[pfx] Re: Problems with round-robin outbound emails

Israel britto via Postfix-users: > My server is configured with the helo -> xpto.com.br Presumably, you are talking about SENDING email. > Spamhaus is listing my IPs because it says that my HELO address > is not aligned with the rDNS of my IPs. Has anyone had this type > of problem and could help

[pfx] Re: problem to add, alias failed

Maurizio Caloro via Postfix-users wrote: > if adding a new user with postfixadmin 3.3.8 or with cli this will run > without problem. > > > > GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON mailserver.* TO markus@'domain.com > ' IDENTIFIED BY > '***'; you

[pfx] Problems with round-robin outbound emails

hello, I'm having a problem with spamhaus that I don't know how to solve. Today I have 1 domain that uses 2 exclusive IPs 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2 The PTR and rDNS entries are correctly configured: 1.1.1.1 > a1.domain.com 2.2.2.2 > a2.domain.com a1.domain.com -> 1.1.1.1 a2.domain.com -> 2.2.2.2 My Post

[pfx] Re: problem to add, alias failed

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:57:18PM +0100, Maurizio Caloro via Postfix-users wrote: > if adding a new user with postfixadmin 3.3.8 or with cli this will run > without problem. > > GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON mailserver.* TO markus@'domain.com > ' IDENTIFIED BY > '*

[pfx] Re: problem to add, alias failed

On Tuesday, January 30, 2024 1:57:18 PM EST Maurizio Caloro via Postfix-users wrote: > if adding a new user with postfixadmin 3.3.8 or with cli this will run > without problem. > > > > GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON mailserver.* TO markus@'domain.com > ' IDENTIFIED BY > '**

[pfx] problem to add, alias failed

if adding a new user with postfixadmin 3.3.8 or with cli this will run without problem. GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON mailserver.* TO markus@'domain.com ' IDENTIFIED BY '***'; FLUSH PRIVILEGES; also on the DATABASES i see the entry Deb

[pfx] Re: Postfix and reproducible builds

I expected the same, but our CI test for reproducibility passed without it. I was surprised. Hopefully I'm about to learn something. Scott K On January 30, 2024 4:00:59 PM UTC, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote: >On 30.01.24 10:12, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users wrote: >> It

[pfx] Re: Postfix and reproducible builds

On 30.01.24 10:12, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users wrote: It looks to me like it does fix it. Isn't/was't the sort important? (I'd expect it to be) On Tuesday, January 30, 2024 9:14:09 AM EST Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users: > In case anyone is unfa

[pfx] Re: Postfix and reproducible builds

It looks to me like it does fix it. Thanks, Scott K On Tuesday, January 30, 2024 9:14:09 AM EST Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: > Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users: > > In case anyone is unfamiliar, you can read about reproducible builds here: > > reproducible-builds.org > > > > It loo

[pfx] Re: Postfix and reproducible builds

Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users: > In case anyone is unfamiliar, you can read about reproducible builds here: > reproducible-builds.org > > It looks like Postfix as shipped is very close to being reproducible. We got > positive results on reproducibility with the patch below added. Is this