- Message from Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
-
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 13:10:55 -0500
From: Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
Reply-To: postfix-users@postfix.org, Viktor Dukhovni
Subject: [pfx] Re: queue_lifetime clarification
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
On Thu
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4srxyy1hslzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
|"IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
|by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
|
|There is so
Thank you Wietse, Viktor and others on Postfix team for your work and support
offered!
Thanks, Rodney, for telling me about Postfix all those years ago!
Thank you to all on this ml for putting up with my often (usually?) ignorant
queries!
Hope to be around for at least some part of next 25 yea
On 14-12-2023 14:20, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
"IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
...
That was a long time ago. Postfix
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 08:20:26AM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
wrote:
> As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
> "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
> by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
>
> There is
On 12/14/2023 7:20 AM, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
"IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
Congratulations on this milestone!
Y
On 14/12/2023 14:20, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
"IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
Thanks Wietse and to all who have con
• Wietse Venema via Postfix-users [2023-12-14 14:20]:
As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
"IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
There is some literature at https://www.postfi
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
> "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release.
[…]
> That was a long time ago. Postfix has evolved as the Internet has
> changed. I am continuing the overhaul of this software, motiv
This accomplishment must feel awesome to those of you that started
this thing and as well to those of you that have participated along
the way.
Thanks for your dedication. I hope you found joy along the way.
Mike
Quoting Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 08:20
Thx Wietse for this part of history and for this best MTA software known
as postfix.
On 14/12/2023 14:20, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
"IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
by a nice ar
It's been that long! I remember trying to learn IP and set up a domain on the
'Net back in the early 2000s (my computer schooling happened when there was no
Internet). And being bewildered with Sendmail. Then I read that the Sendmail
config looked like a cat had taken a nap on the keyboard --
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:41:17PM +0100, Marek Podmaka via Postfix-users wrote:
> > and used header_checks to hold the mails in queue.
> >
> > Now, as no decision is made, I want to continue to hold for another 13
> > days more.
> >
> > Will this change, hold the queue for another 13 days more? O
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 08:20:26AM -0500, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
> "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
> by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
Many thanks.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:04:32AM +0100, Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I´d say Viktor is biased towards 3 1 1.
It isn't a bias, it is a rational recommendation. There are multiple
issues with "2 1 1":
- With a public issuer CA, you're adding a redundant trusted party,
hello Wietse,
We have been running hundreds of Postfix servers for more than twenty years now
and all this thanks to you.
Postfix is the best MTA ever came out of an human brain. It is the swiss knife
for mail things.
Postfix is to the mail what linux is to the OS, magic, fast, low energy.
Dnia 14.12.2023 o godz. 08:20:26 Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
> As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
> "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
> by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
[...]
> That was a long t
I am a retired System Administrator. I have used Postfix to feed
Exchange servers. I trust Postfix on the front line.
Now as a hobbyist I use it for my personal domain.
Thank you for the continued dedication to the project.
25 years is a huge accomplishment.
Congratulations!
--john
On 12
Congratulations, and thank you!
And for 25 years, you have been politely answering user questions
about it. I believe this makes you eligible for sainthood. :-)
==ml
--
Michael W. Lucashttps://mwl.io/
author of: Absolute OpenBSD, SSH Mastery, git commit murder,
Absolute FreeBSD, But
* Wietse Venema via Postfix-users :
> As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
> "IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
> by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
Ah, it's today. Recently I scrolled through the Changelog a
2023. 12. 14. 14:20 keltezéssel, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users írta:
As a few on this list may recall, it is 25 years ago today that the
"IBM secure mailer" had its public beta release. This was accompanied
by a nice article in the New York Times business section.
Thank you Wietse for your wo
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users writes:
> (...thanks...)
> That was a long time ago. Postfix has evolved as the Internet has
> changed. I am continuing the overhaul of this software, motivated
> by people like you on this mailing list.
>
Hellow Wietse!
I am running two Postfix servers for years
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 12:14, anant--- via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
>
> and used header_checks to hold the mails in queue.
>
> Now, as no decision is made, I want to continue to hold for another 13
> days more.
>
>
> Will this change, hold the queue for another 13 days mor
Hello,
For some specific reason we had a requirement of holding the mails in
mailq for the mails coming from a specific domain.
To achieve the same, added 2 lines in main.cf
bounce_queue_lifetime = 7d
maximal_queue_lifetime = 7d
and used header_checks to hold the mails in queue.
Now, as no
I´d say Viktor is biased towards 3 1 1. You may call me biased towards 2 1 1
because I dislike pinning a key that is supposed to rotate.
In any case you need to automate updates or monitoring and I do, though the
relevant "change" use case in 2 1 1 didn´t happen so far.
Joachim
-Ursprünglich
raf via Postfix-users writes:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 02:00:55PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>> So anyone relying on DANE-TA(2) (certificate usage 2) needs to closely
>> watch for upcoming announcements from LE, and be prepared to add TLSA
>> records for the new inteme
26 matches
Mail list logo
