On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:30:27PM -0400, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
> I have a postfix-3.7.4 server with openssl-3.0.9 on fedora38 and
> receiving the following errors in my logs:
>
> Sep 11 14:19:51 cipher postfix/smtps/smtpd[3992923]: warning: TLS library
> problem: error:0AC1:SSL routi
Hi,
I have a postfix-3.7.4 server with openssl-3.0.9 on fedora38 and receiving
the following errors in my logs:
Sep 11 14:19:51 cipher postfix/smtps/smtpd[3992923]: warning: TLS library
problem: error:0AC1:SSL routines::no shared
cipher:ssl/statem/statem_srvr.c:2220:
What kind of clients is t
On 2023-09-11 at 12:15:10 UTC-0400 (Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:15:10 -0700
(PDT))
Fred Morris via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Looks like you've got the general idea.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Jesper Hansen via Postfix-users wrote:
[...]
All the non port 25 tests, took about 15-27 hops.
But t
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:15:10AM -0700, Fred Morris via Postfix-users wrote:
> I think we've reached the limits of scope for a mailing list devoted to an
> MTA. It appears that traffic improbably ends up at 192.168.20.20. That's
> probably good enough, digging into the /why/ could become a hobby
Looks like you've got the general idea.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Jesper Hansen via Postfix-users wrote:
[...]
All the non port 25 tests, took about 15-27 hops.
But the port 25 ones only took 7 or 8, and have a look at the IP at the
next-to-last hop of the route.
192.168.20.20?? What?
[...]
5 16
https://paste.debian.net/hidden/e36bc8c5/
Il 10/09/2023 22:00, roughnecks via Postfix-users ha scritto:
Sorry just noticed that the pastebin got nuked, tomorrow will paste again.
Il 10 settembre 2023 21:58:08 CEST, roughnecks via Postfix-users
ha scritto:
Anyone here with an idea? Gues
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:59:55AM +0200, François Patte via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > If you continue to treat the hostname of your ISP's (FAI's) SMTP relay
> > as restricted sensitive information, the help you'll receive will also
> > be restricted to vague generalities.
>
> My new main.cf :
>
On 11/09/23 19:59, François Patte via Postfix-users wrote:
And updated the security level to "secure".
If I turn this to "secure", I get in maillog file:
server certificate verification failed for
smtp.gmx.com[212.227.17.174]:465: num=62:hostname mismatch
Le 11/09/2023 à 13:33, Peter via Po
Le 11/09/2023 à 14:23, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users a écrit :
And updated the security level to "secure".
On 11/09/23 19:59, François Patte via Postfix-users wrote:
If I turn this to "secure", I get in maillog file:
server certificate verification failed for
smtp.gmx.com[212.227.
Le 11/09/2023 à 13:33, Peter via Postfix-users a écrit :
On 11/09/23 19:59, François Patte via Postfix-users wrote:
And updated the security level to "secure".
If I turn this to "secure", I get in maillog file:
server certificate verification failed for
smtp.gmx.com[212.227.17.174]:465: num=6
And updated the security level to "secure".
On 11/09/23 19:59, François Patte via Postfix-users wrote:
If I turn this to "secure", I get in maillog file:
server certificate verification failed for
smtp.gmx.com[212.227.17.174]:465: num=62:hostname mismatch
On 11.09.23 23:33, Peter via Postfi
On 11/09/23 19:59, François Patte via Postfix-users wrote:
And updated the security level to "secure".
If I turn this to "secure", I get in maillog file:
server certificate verification failed for
smtp.gmx.com[212.227.17.174]:465: num=62:hostname mismatch
The cert is signed for mail.gmx.com,
Le 10/09/2023 à 18:23, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 10:38:27AM +0200, François Patte via Postfix-users
wrote:
Sep 9 16:50:49 myserver postfix/smtp[205832]: 92BEFB4BEA:
to=, relay=my-fai-smtp[x.x.x.x]:465, delay=0.22,
delays=0.04/0.08/0.08/0.02, dsn=5.0.0
13 matches
Mail list logo
