On 13/10/2022 8:04 am, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
The HISTORY file says it is:
20041014-23
Postfix still appends $@myorigin or .$mydomain to headers
from the Postfix sendmail command, or from clients listed
with the new local_header_rewrite_clients parameter (default:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:41:36 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> local_header_rewrite_clients = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated
>
> Why it isn't the default I cannot remember.
The HISTORY file says it is:
> 20041014-23
>
> Postfix still appends $@myorigin or .$mydomain to hea
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 06:39:58PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> > >Will it be 2s or something between 2s and 15s?
> > >If it's 'between', can we somehow tell it from the mail service side?
> > >
> > >00:00 postfix/smtpd ... client=
> > >00:02 postfix/qmgr ... (qu
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 06:39:58PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >Will it be 2s or something between 2s and 15s?
> >If it's 'between', can we somehow tell it from the mail service side?
> >
> >00:00 postfix/smtpd ... client=
> >00:02 postfix/qmgr ... (queue active)
> >[...]
> >00:14 p
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:36:21PM +0200, juan smitt wrote:
> The clients are very sensitive to the mail service's response time (we
> can't do anything with that).
If they're that latency sensitive, they should switch from SMTP to HTTP
POST. The SMTP is not an instant messaging protocol, and is
On 12.10.22 17:41, juan smitt wrote:
I think my question wasn't clear enough.
The client (a java application) is also measuring the mail delivery
time from its point of view.
According to this imaginary log, what result will the client (most
probably) get?
Will it be 2s or something between 2s
Hi Wietse and Matus,
Thanks for your reply.
I think my question wasn't clear enough.
The client (a java application) is also measuring the mail delivery
time from its point of view.
According to this imaginary log, what result will the client (most
probably) get?
Will it be 2s or something bet
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 01:07:43AM +1300, Nick Tait wrote:
> And so I ended up removing the option from
> main.cf and including "-o local_header_rewrite_clients=static:all" in
> master.cf instead:
>
> submission inet n - y - - smtpd
> -o syslog_name=post
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 09:05:34AM -0400, PGNet Dev wrote:
> when selecting DNSSEC signing algorithms for eventual use with DANE
> setup, checking first @
>
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers/dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml#dns-sec-alg-numbers-1
>
> both algos 8 & 13 are l
>Nick Tait:
>> Anyway it turned out to be fairly simple to get Postfix to add the
>> missing Message-ID header: I just needed the email to satisfy
>> "local_header_rewrite_clients".
On 12.10.22 09:41, Wietse Venema wrote:
>This will break valid DKIM signatures when you change the setting
>to
Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> >Nick Tait:
> >> A couple of months ago an email I sent from my phone was bounced by the
> >> recipient's SMTP server because the email had no Message-ID header. It
> >> turns out the email app that I've been using on my phone for years
> >> doesn't generate a Message-ID,
Nick Tait:
A couple of months ago an email I sent from my phone was bounced by the
recipient's SMTP server because the email had no Message-ID header. It
turns out the email app that I've been using on my phone for years
doesn't generate a Message-ID, but this was the first time that this had
bee
On 12.10.22 12:36, juan smitt wrote:
The clients are very sensitive to the mail service's response time (we
can't do anything with that).
I have ancountered this issue too.
According to this example, is it true that the client considers the
email delivered when we see the "(queue active)" ent
juan smitt:
> Hi,
>
>
> The clients are very sensitive to the mail service's response time (we
> can't do anything with that).
The response time from what? Here is an example conversation:
Client connects to server
(If DNS is broken, there may be some delay)
TCP handshake
(If
juan smitt:
> Hi,
>
>
> The clients are very sensitive to the mail service's response time (we
> can't do anything with that).
I suggest that you look at the delays= logging. This breaks down the
time that a message spends inside Postfix.
https://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#delay_logging_re
On 2022-10-12 at 09:05:34 UTC-0400 (Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:05:34 -0400)
PGNet Dev
is rumored to have said:
*must* I sign my DNSSEC keys for my domains with the same algo in-use
by the respective TLDs' roots in order to not fubar DANE usage
specifically,
No.
or can I (arbitrarily) use any algo
Nick Tait:
> Hi list.
>
> A couple of months ago an email I sent from my phone was bounced by the
> recipient's SMTP server because the email had no Message-ID header. It
> turns out the email app that I've been using on my phone for years
> doesn't generate a Message-ID, but this was the first
when selecting DNSSEC signing algorithms for eventual use with DANE setup,
checking first @
https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-sec-alg-numbers/dns-sec-alg-numbers.xhtml#dns-sec-alg-numbers-1
both algos 8 & 13 are listed as options:
Number Description Mnemonic
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:37:44 -0400
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > Do I have to worry?
>
> If Android clients aren't a concern for your MTA, you should perhaps
> configure your ACME client (e.g. certbot) to build a chain file without
> the cross certificate. Details on the letsencrypt.org website:
Hi list.
A couple of months ago an email I sent from my phone was bounced by the
recipient's SMTP server because the email had no Message-ID header. It
turns out the email app that I've been using on my phone for years
doesn't generate a Message-ID, but this was the first time that this had
b
Hi,
The clients are very sensitive to the mail service's response time (we
can't do anything with that).
According to this example, is it true that the client considers the
email delivered when we see the "(queue active)" entry in the log
whatever happens to the mail later?
Can we calculate the
21 matches
Mail list logo
