International Domain Characters and Header Checks

2022-05-20 Thread Bryan K. Walton
We are trying to do some header checks that block on both the From and Return Path header, but that also block some addresses with international characters in them. Characters like: ù, ǔ, ɫ, ɇ, etc. I've read this page: https://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html and I understand that header ch

Re: Migrate mbox from 2.6.6 to 3.5.6

2022-05-20 Thread Jim Garrison
On 5/20/2022 6:14 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On 20 May 2022, at 9:09 am, Rob McGee wrote: It's also perhaps worth mentioning that Postfix has nothing to to with mail once it has been delivered. This question should have been sent to a mailing list for the unstated IMAP server. This is almost

Re: Migrate mbox from 2.6.6 to 3.5.6

2022-05-20 Thread @lbutlr
On 2022 May 20, at 08:24, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Bill Cole wrote in > : > > |In fact, 'mbox' standardization is horrendous. One shouldn't have > > That was overcome with RFC 4155 in 2005. Hah! Good one! -- Competent? How are we going to compete with that?

Re: Mail looping issue

2022-05-20 Thread @lbutlr
On 2022 May 19, at 12:56, Jeremy Hansen wrote: > I’m trying to do a ssh port forward of port 25 from my local mta to an aws > node so my mta doesn’t have to be directly on the routable internet. Why does your mta need port 25 at all if it's not routable? > I’m seeing an interesting problem due

Re: sender_canonical_maps, but only for particular recipient domain?

2022-05-20 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-05-18 at 10:49:24 UTC-0400 (Wed, 18 May 2022 16:49:24 +0200) Jaroslaw Rafa is rumored to have said: Dnia 18.05.2022 o godz. 16:40:19 Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze: changing to ~all or -all could help. I wonder if google couldn't be fine with dkim=pass but it's google... Google shows

Re: Migrate mbox from 2.6.6 to 3.5.6

2022-05-20 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Bill Cole wrote in : |On 2022-05-19 at 23:13:26 UTC-0400 (Thu, 19 May 2022 23:13:26 -0400) |Phil Stracchino |is rumored to have said: | |> mbox is mbox is mbox. The whole point of standards is that they are |> standard. |> |> (Of course, it's also said that the wonderful thing about stan

Re: Migrate mbox from 2.6.6 to 3.5.6

2022-05-20 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-05-19 at 23:13:26 UTC-0400 (Thu, 19 May 2022 23:13:26 -0400) Phil Stracchino is rumored to have said: mbox is mbox is mbox. The whole point of standards is that they are standard. (Of course, it's also said that the wonderful thing about standards is that there are so many to choose

Re: Mail looping issue

2022-05-20 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-05-19 at 14:56:57 UTC-0400 (Thu, 19 May 2022 11:56:57 -0700) Jeremy Hansen is rumored to have said: Any suggestions on this aside from “don’t do that” It would help a lot if you gave a less vague problem description. See: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail I suspect ANY s

Re: Migrate mbox from 2.6.6 to 3.5.6

2022-05-20 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2022-05-20 15:09, Rob McGee wrote: It's also perhaps worth mentioning that Postfix has nothing to to with mail once it has been delivered. This question should have been sent to a mailing list for the unstated IMAP server. feel free to remove mbox, maildir support in postfix, as long it ex

Re: Migrate mbox from 2.6.6 to 3.5.6

2022-05-20 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On 20 May 2022, at 9:09 am, Rob McGee wrote: > > It's also perhaps worth mentioning that Postfix has nothing to to with > mail once it has been delivered. This question should have been sent > to a mailing list for the unstated IMAP server. This is almost true. The main caveat is that either

Re: Migrate mbox from 2.6.6 to 3.5.6

2022-05-20 Thread Rob McGee
On 2022-05-19 22:13, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 5/19/22 19:25, Jim Garrison wrote: I am migrating an ancient mail server running 2.6.6 to a new host running postfix 3.5.6. This is a simple setup with just a handful of users and no complications like virtual mailboxes. Simple question: Is it as