Re: Virtual users with postfix and dovecot

Wednesday, January 12, 2022, 5:10:05 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:03:35PM +1100, Phil Biggs wrote: >> Yes, I did have the content of two files mixed up. Apologies for that. >> >> vmailbox contains: >> @pjb.cc all > You can leave $virtual_mailbox_maps empty, since you

Re: Virtual users with postfix and dovecot

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:03:35PM +1100, Phil Biggs wrote: > Yes, I did have the content of two files mixed up. Apologies for that. > > vmailbox contains: > @pjb.cc all You can leave $virtual_mailbox_maps empty, since your virtual_alias_maps table suffices for recipient validation. But you can

Re: Virtual users with postfix and dovecot

Wednesday, January 12, 2022, 11:53:39 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:09:02AM +1100, Phil Biggs wrote: >> Here's what I have so far. >> >> main.cf includes: >> >> # Route inbound for valid recipients to dovecot >> virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/spool/postfix/private

Re: Virtual users with postfix and dovecot

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 04:51:41PM +1100, raf wrote: > The other main difference is that I have the large number of address > in /etc/postfix/virtual pointing to a small number of entries in > /etc/postfix/virtual_mailbox_maps. So the addresses go in virtual, and > the accounts go in vmailbox. Tha

Re: Virtual users with postfix and dovecot

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:09:02AM +1100, Phil Biggs wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a lot of email addresses of the form mbYYMMDD@ (just like the one I'm > sending from here). They're unique to a specific site/purpose and have > accumulated over nearly 20 years. > > My current windows-based

Re: Adding Additional domains and outgoing email

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:41:55PM -0500, Bill Cole wrote: > On 2022-01-11 at 19:58:09 UTC-0500 (Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:58:09 -0500) > Ruben Safir > is rumored to have said: > > >> > >>I hope that makes some sense. But I still don't > >>understand your statement that "It is hitting on port > >>587"

Re: Adding Additional domains and outgoing email

On 2022-01-11 at 19:58:09 UTC-0500 (Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:58:09 -0500) Ruben Safir is rumored to have said: I hope that makes some sense. But I still don't understand your statement that "It is hitting on port 587" I'm not sure what you mean by "It". It means that thunderbird, outside the net

Re: Adding Additional domains and outgoing email

> > I hope that makes some sense. But I still don't > understand your statement that "It is hitting on port > 587" I'm not sure what you mean by "It". It means that thunderbird, outside the network, is reaching across the internet and tickling port 587 on postfix and it doesn't care... it still

Re: Virtual users with postfix and dovecot

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:09:02AM +1100, Phil Biggs wrote: > Here's what I have so far. > > main.cf includes: > > # Route inbound for valid recipients to dovecot > virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp > virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/usr/local/etc/postfix/vmailbox

Re: Adding Additional domains and outgoing email

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 11:14:34AM +1100, raf wrote: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Ruben Safir > wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:09:45PM +1100, raf wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:10:26AM -0500, Ruben Safir > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > /etc/postfix/main.cf:

Re: comercial spam filterin

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 04:10:58PM +0100, Joachim Lindenberg wrote: > Hello Levi, > In my experience the best spam protection is a custom domain with an email > server supporting gray-listing (postfix does). I receive almost no spam on my > own domain but plenty on addresses hosted by public e

Re: Adding Additional domains and outgoing email

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Ruben Safir wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:09:45PM +1100, raf wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:10:26AM -0500, Ruben Safir > > wrote: > > > > > > > > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > > > > > > smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot > > > > > > smtpd_sasl_pat

Virtual users with postfix and dovecot

Hello all, I have a lot of email addresses of the form mbYYMMDD@ (just like the one I'm sending from here). They're unique to a specific site/purpose and have accumulated over nearly 20 years. My current windows-based MSA allows the MUA user "ml-postfix-users" to login and receive emails usin

Re: Re: After smtp authentication failed, is it possible to accecpt and send the email as anonymous?

* JWD: > Will permit_mynetworks parameter ignore smtp authentication, and > accept the email? Please see http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html#lists for detailed information about using access restriction lists. -Ralph

Re: https://www.postfix.org/ in trouble

> On Jan 11, 2022, at 2:07 PM, Dan Mahoney wrote: > > > >> On Jan 11, 2022, at 10:38 AM, Claus R. Wickinghoff > > wrote: >> >> Mojn, >> >>> Today I find only a directory listing at www.postfix.org >>> or www.postfix.com

Re: https://www.postfix.org/ in trouble

> Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 19:38:05 +0100 >> From: "Claus R. Wickinghoff" >> Today I find only a directory listing at www.postfix.org or >>> www.postfix.com >> With http it's working. >> >> With https I get a certificate warning (issued for >> archive.science.uu.nl) and a directory listi

Re: https://www.postfix.org/ in trouble

> On Jan 11, 2022, at 10:38 AM, Claus R. Wickinghoff > wrote: > > Mojn, > >> Today I find only a directory listing at www.postfix.org or www.postfix.com > With http it's working. > > With https I get a certificate warning (issued for archive.science.uu.nl) and > a directory listing. > > So

Re: https://www.postfix.org/ in trouble

> Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 19:38:05 +0100 > From: "Claus R. Wickinghoff" > >> Today I find only a directory listing at www.postfix.org or >> www.postfix.com > With http it's working. > > With https I get a certificate warning (issued for > archive.science.uu.nl) and a directory listing.

Re: https://www.postfix.org/ in trouble

Mojn, Today I find only a directory listing at www.postfix.org or www.postfix.com With http it's working. With https I get a certificate warning (issued for archive.science.uu.nl) and a directory listing. So might be a regional problem? Groetjes Claus -- Claus R. Wickinghoff, Dipl.-In

Re: Adding Additional domains and outgoing email

On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 02:09:45PM +1100, raf wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:10:26AM -0500, Ruben Safir > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > /etc/postfix/main.cf: > > > > > smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot > > > > > smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth > > > > > > > > Can't this be done with tls witho

Re: https://www.postfix.org/ in trouble

> raf wrote: >> Being flippant, it would protect against a >> man-in-the-middle-attack where someone tricks you into >> reading false online documentation. :-) > > Why bother? Most of us can misread the docs perfectly well all on our > own... > > -kgd Today I find only a directory listing at

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

On 2022-01-11 18:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: recipient follows what sender domain's admin configured. stop blaming recipient onto sender's problem. On 11.01.22 18:34, Benny Pedersen wrote: what went wrong here ? i dont reject softfails in mta stage, in spamassassin softfails is still a

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

On 2022-01-11 18:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: recipient follows what sender domain's admin configured. stop blaming recipient onto sender's problem. what went wrong here ? i dont reject softfails in mta stage, in spamassassin softfails is still a factor we dont have to argue anymore

Re: OT: comercial spam filterin

On 11.01.22 13:34, Levente Birta wrote: Hi My apologies for the off topic. I would like to ask the users here if someone using a commercial spam and/or virus filtering with postfix and which one? Thanks Levi I am using https://rspamd.com on my email server. It has pretty good spam detect

Re: TLS ciphers

On 11.01.22 15:46, Bill Cole wrote: On 2022-01-10 at 19:15:46 UTC-0500 (Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:15:46 -0500) Alex is rumored to have said: [...] Here are my current settings: # postconf -n -c /etc/postfix-117|grep -E 'tls|cipher' smtp_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2,!SSLv3,!TLSv1,!TLSv1.1 smtp_tls

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

On 2022-01-11 10:40, Enrico Morelli wrote: sending mail to some external users I receive this error: Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: domain owner discourages use of this host. (in reply to RCPT TO command)) What means? Is the problem related to my postfix mail server? On

Re: TLS ciphers

Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 11:33:12 Bill Cole pisze: > > It's mildly amusing that THIS THREAD is an example of one risk of > not simply trusting Wietse & Viktor (with broad community oversight) > to get the TLS defaults right. That's exactly what I wanted to say. Just let's trust Postfix authors tha

Re: TLS ciphers

On 2022-01-11 at 10:16:20 UTC-0500 (Tue, 11 Jan 2022 16:16:20 +0100) Charlotte 🦝 Delenk is rumored to have said: On 11.01.22 15:46, Bill Cole wrote: On 2022-01-10 at 19:15:46 UTC-0500 (Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:15:46 -0500) Alex is rumored to have said: [...] Here are my current settings: # postco

Re: TLS ciphers

Charlotte ? Delenk wrote:- >We are talking about systems that should not be running in prod anymore, >but still are due to inertia. Mails not being delivered may hopefully be >the push that kickstarts upgrading efforts. But it is not that the email fails delivery, rather it is transmitted unen

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

On 2022-01-10 at 23:00:43 UTC-0500 (Tue, 11 Jan 2022 05:00:43 +0100) Fourhundred Thecat <400the...@gmx.ch> is rumored to have said: Hello, is it safe to ban senders that generate SPF Softfail ? No. policyd-spf: prepend Received-SPF: Softfail I have pasted full header here: https://ctxt.i

AW: comercial spam filterin

Hello Levi, In my experience the best spam protection is a custom domain with an email server supporting gray-listing (postfix does). I receive almost no spam on my own domain but plenty on addresses hosted by public email providers like live.com (despite the rigorous black listing of outlook.co

Re: After smtp authentication failed, is it possible to accecpt and send the email as anonymous?

On 2022-01-11 at 02:21:23 UTC-0500 (Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:21:23 +0800) JWD is rumored to have said: There is a website, which sending email use smtp authentication only, can not use anonymous. Postfix is a mail gateway, and I don't want install a smtp authentication backend. Will permit_mynetw

Re: TLS ciphers

On 2022-01-10 at 19:15:46 UTC-0500 (Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:15:46 -0500) Alex is rumored to have said: [...] Here are my current settings: # postconf -n -c /etc/postfix-117|grep -E 'tls|cipher' smtp_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv2,!SSLv3,!TLSv1,!TLSv1.1 smtp_tls_protocols = !SSLv2,!SSLv3,!TLSv1,!TL

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

On 2022-01-11 10:40, Enrico Morelli wrote: Dear all, sending mail to some external users I receive this error: Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: domain owner discourages use of this host. (in reply to RCPT TO command)) What means? Is the problem related to my postfix mail s

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

On 2022-01-11 12:54, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: On 2022-01-11 10:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 11.01.22 05:00, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender (non-spam) would generate soft fail? misconfiguratons. I am quite happy to ban mis

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

On 2022-01-11 12:51, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze: What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender (non-spam) would generate soft fail? Forwarding. you mean SPF fail in general

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze: What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender (non-spam) would generate soft fail? Forwarding. diffrent spf domain

Re: OT: comercial spam filterin

On 2022-01-11 13:34, Levente Birta wrote: I would like to ask the users here if someone using a commercial spam and/or virus filtering with postfix and which one? i just let spamhuas and o365 handle it, thay block ips and claim ip is malware so in there case is that ip is malware i begin t

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

On 11.01.22 05:00, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender (non-spam) would generate soft fail? On 2022-01-11 10:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: misconfiguratons. On 11.01.22 12:54, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: I am quite happy to ban misc

OT: comercial spam filterin

Hi My apologies for the off topic. I would like to ask the users here if someone using a commercial spam and/or virus filtering with postfix and which one? Thanks Levi

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 12:51:54 Fourhundred Thecat pisze: > > On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: > >Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze: > >> > >>What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender > >>(non-spam) would generate soft fail? > > > >Forwardin

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

On 11.01.22 10:54, Enrico Morelli wrote: On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:48:53 +0100 Charlotte 🦝 Delenk wrote: Hi, On 11.01.22 10:40, Enrico Morelli wrote: Dear all, sending mail to some external users I receive this error: Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: domain owner discourage

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

> On 2022-01-11 10:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 11.01.22 05:00, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender (non-spam) would generate soft fail? misconfiguratons. I am quite happy to ban misconfigured / misbehaved servers. Shouldn't l

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

> On 2022-01-11 11:32, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze: What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender (non-spam) would generate soft fail? Forwarding. you mean SPF fail in general? I am asking specifically for "soft fail"

Re: [OT] "private" emails aliases

On 10.01.22 18:25, @lbutlr wrote: Is there an existing system out there that integrates with postfix that makes it simple for a user to add 'private' email addresses that are aliased to their real email and also to then bitbucket the email? What I am thinking about is something where a user ca

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

Hi, On 11.01.22 10:40, Enrico Morelli wrote: Dear all, sending mail to some external users I receive this error: Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: domain owner discourages use of this host. (in reply to RCPT TO command)) What means? Is the problem related to my postfix mai

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

Dnia 11.01.2022 o godz. 05:00:43 Fourhundred Thecat pisze: > > What I am asking is, are there situations where legitimate sender > (non-spam) would generate soft fail? Forwarding. -- Regards, Jaroslaw Rafa r...@rafa.eu.org -- "In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know:

Re: [OT] "private" emails aliases

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 17:38, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On 2022-01-10 18:25, @lbutlr wrote: > > > I can think of some (messy) ways to do this, but before I start > > cobbling something together, I am hoping this is something someone has > > already done. > > why external ? > > in main.cf: > > mydes

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

On 11.01.22 10:40, Enrico Morelli wrote: >Dear all, > >sending mail to some external users I receive this error: > >Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: domain owner >discourages use of this host. (in reply to RCPT TO command)) > >What means? Is the problem related to my postfix m

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:48:53 +0100 Charlotte 🦝 Delenk wrote: > Hi, > On 11.01.22 10:40, Enrico Morelli wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > sending mail to some external users I receive this error: > > > > Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: domain owner > > discourages use of this hos

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:43:14 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 11.01.22 10:40, Enrico Morelli wrote: > >Dear all, > > > >sending mail to some external users I receive this error: > > > >Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: domain owner > >discourages use of this host. (in r

Re: domain owner discourages use of this host

On 11.01.22 10:40, Enrico Morelli wrote: Dear all, sending mail to some external users I receive this error: Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: domain owner discourages use of this host. (in reply to RCPT TO command)) What means? Is the problem related to my postfix mail se

Re: Re: After smtp authentication failed, is it possible to accecpt and send the email as anonymous?

On 11.01.22 15:21, JWD wrote: There is a website, which sending email use smtp authentication only, can not use anonymous. Postfix is a mail gateway, and I don't want install a smtp authentication backend. smtp authentication won't be supported/allowed/offered then. Will permit_mynetworks p

Re: Received-SPF: Softfail

On 11.01.22 05:00, Fourhundred Thecat wrote: is it safe to ban senders that generate SPF Softfail ? The point of softfail is NOT to reject those mails - that's wht soft means. policyd-spf: prepend Received-SPF: Softfail I have pasted full header here: https://ctxt.io/2/AABg5vIYEw What I am

domain owner discourages use of this host

Dear all, sending mail to some external users I receive this error: Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: domain owner discourages use of this host. (in reply to RCPT TO command)) What means? Is the problem related to my postfix mail server? -- ---