Re: what's best guess record for SPF

Dnia 10.12.2021 o godz. 12:58:06 Piper H pisze: > I dont think so @raf. I can specify my IP's hostname to t-online.de too. Yes, you can set PTR of your IP to somename.t-online.de, but somename.t-online.de won't resolve back to your IP. And this is the method of checking that MTAs (eg. Postfix) usu

Re: what's best guess record for SPF

On December 10, 2021 4:32:50 AM UTC, raf wrote: >On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:55:54PM +0800, Piper H wrote: > >> I sent an email from my t-online.de account to gmail. >> Gmail shows SPF pass by best guessing: >> >> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of >> x...@t-online

Re: what's best guess record for SPF

I dont think so @raf. I can specify my IP's hostname to t-online.de too. On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:34 PM raf wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:55:54PM +0800, Piper H > wrote: > > > I sent an email from my t-online.de account to gmail. > > Gmail shows SPF pass by best guessing: > > > > Receiv

Re: what's best guess record for SPF

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 07:55:54PM +0800, Piper H wrote: > I sent an email from my t-online.de account to gmail. > Gmail shows SPF pass by best guessing: > > Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of > x...@t-online.de designates 194.25.134.18 as permitted sender) > client-

Re: virtual mailbox domains??

On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 04:32:26PM -0500, post...@aecperformance.com wrote: > Thanks *so much* for all your help. > > Another complete rebuild and I think I’ve finally got it. > > I was able to log into mail.sizzelicks.com for smok...@sizzelicks.com > this time wi

RE: virtual mailbox domains??

Thanks *so much* for all your help. Another complete rebuild and I think I’ve finally got it. I was able to log into mail.sizzelicks.com for smok...@sizzelicks.com this time with no trouble. I sent an email to smok...@sizzelicks.com

Re: SMTPUTF8 is required...

On 2021-12-09 14:25, Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote: This error came up: "SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host..." I've already tweaked this options: smtputf8_enable = no compatibility_level = 2 Error appeared again, so. What else can I do? Running Postfix 3.4.14 with Dovecot 2

Re: SMTPUTF8 is required...

On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:25:40AM -0300, Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote: > This error came up: "SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host..." > Error appeared again, so. What else can I do? Please follow the documentation: http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail Bastian -- You're

Re: SMTPUTF8 is required...

Daniel Armando Rodriguez: > Hi there > > This error came up: "SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by > host..." > > I've already tweaked this options: > > smtputf8_enable = no > compatibility_level = 2 > > Error appeared again, so. What else can I do? 1) Edit the right file(s). Paramete

SMTPUTF8 is required...

Hi there This error came up: "SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host..." I've already tweaked this options: smtputf8_enable = no compatibility_level = 2 Error appeared again, so. What else can I do? Running Postfix 3.4.14 with Dovecot 2.3.4.1 on Debian 10 Thanks in advance

Re: not very sensible question

natan: > Hi > Sorry for my stupid question.? I know you shouldn't do that -but it > interests me. > > One of my client have old qmail+ldap (virtualboxes in ldap) but it's not > have virtualdomain list - this server is for incoming mail only (MX) > > In qmail i found "magic path" who allow all dom

not very sensible question

Hi Sorry for my stupid question.  I know you shouldn't do that -but it interests me. One of my client have old qmail+ldap (virtualboxes in ldap) but it's not have virtualdomain list - this server is for incoming mail only (MX) In qmail i found "magic path" who allow all domain which have MX set m