On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:51:09PM +0100, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> > j...@p27.eu j...@p27.eu
>
> I added it to virtual, where it did not exist.
>
> > and make sure to remove (not include) "virtual" in:
> >
> > propagate_unmatched_extensions = canonical
> >
> > the default setting inc
>> Dovecot has the same setting: recipient_delimiter = +
>> In the logs, is the mail being rejected by postfix or by dovecot
>> after postfix tries to deliver?
> I'm not 100% sure: I suspect dovecot because the error occurs talking
> on the pipe to dovecot.
>
> postfix/pipe[3889979]: A0BCEA0FEB:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 04:39:34PM -0300, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> This is the kind of knowledge that comes from Mars...
The `jq` interpreter is a rather handy tool. It is is worth learning if
you spend enough time working with JSON data. No Martian passport
required, just enough incentive and c
On 06/11/2021 23:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On 6 Nov 2021, at 3:43 pm, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
>>
>> In main.cf I have set
>>
>> recipient_delimiter = +
>>
>> Reading the docs, I don't see anything else I ought to set for this to
>> work: postfix should first try delivery to jeff+post...@p27
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 07:00:12PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> > My expectation is that dovecot is not involved in this issue, but I'm
> > not sure, so I mention anyway that that I have set
> >
> > virtual_transport = dovecot
>
>
> Dovecot has the same setting: recipient_delimiter = +
>
> On 7 Nov 2021, at 3:08 pm, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
>
> Yes I can, but only if you send me the config files you want the results for.
> It will be a pleasure.
I'm afraid there aren't any "config" files I can send you.
I had assumed that you know or can find out how to temporarily
disable AppArmor
Yes I can, but only if you send me the config files you want the results
for.
It will be a pleasure.
Em sáb., 6 de nov. de 2021 às 12:28, Viktor Dukhovni <
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> escreveu:
> > On 5 Nov 2021, at 5:14 pm, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> >
> > POSTFIX logs using DOCKER non-chrooted an
Let me know if you need any help.
[]s
Em sáb., 6 de nov. de 2021 às 10:31, Curtis Maurand
escreveu:
>
> Perfect. That was the other solution I had been looking at.
>
> ==C
>
Where did Viktor come from...
Definitely not from this Earth.
This is the kind of knowledge that comes from Mars...
For more humans like you here... cheers!
Em sex., 5 de nov. de 2021 às 22:04, Viktor Dukhovni <
postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> escreveu:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 12:32:14AM +0100, ric
There are times when you get temporary blocked and the message has to be
delivery.
For those cases, hold is a great tool. I do use HOLD for yahoo deliveries
very often.
BR,
R
Em qui., 28 de out. de 2021 às 06:12, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:39:52AM +0200, richard lucasse
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 21:03:34 -0400
Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > I have run the jq script for a week or so ($days = 5) and it works
> > like a charm :-)
>
> You're welcome. Of course if the number of days will never vary in
> your case, it would be simpler to just hard-code the number into the
> jq
Hi,
try to reject mail that contains a Reply-To with GMail in it. Easy to set,
minimal to no false-positive potential.
And see if that comes near the effect you want.
My observation is that it matches around 90% of the typical Googemail spam.
ps. GMail is the #1 spam/scam facilitator for years
Dnia 6.11.2021 o godz. 16:56:01 li...@lazygranch.com pisze:
> Note a few of the spammers put their email address in the subject line.
> Maybe that should be my first attempt at discarding. I can't think of a
> non-spammer doing that.
Some MUAs do. I use mutt, and if you forward a message in mutt,
13 matches
Mail list logo
