On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-07-16 09:12, raf wrote:
>
> > According to this:
> >
> > https://postmarkapp.com/blog/proof-dkim-and-senderid-improve-delivery
>
> please stay away from senderid, its deprecated
Yes, I thought it was strange that they m
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 02:30:43PM -0400, Thirumurugan Kalapatti wrote:
> Jul 16 12:23:30 hostM postfix/smtp[698664]: 7A2A020ECDC6: to=,
> relay=none, delay=0.05, delays=0.02/0.03/0/0, dsn=5.4.4, status=bounced
> (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=hostb type=A:
> Host not
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:30:43 -0400
Thirumurugan Kalapatti wrote:
> Jul 16 12:23:30 hostM postfix/smtp[698664]: 7A2A020ECDC6:
> to=, relay=none, delay=0.05, delays=0.02/0.03/0/0,
> dsn=5.4.4, status=bounced (Host or domain name not found. Name
> service error for name=hostb type=A: Host not found)
Thanks, good catch. But fixing the typo made the server to start (without
the quotes).
But I still get this error..
Jul 16 12:23:30 hostM postfix/smtp[698664]: 7A2A020ECDC6: to=,
relay=none, delay=0.05, delays=0.02/0.03/0/0, dsn=5.4.4, status=bounced
(Host or domain name not found. Name service e
On 2021-07-16 at 11:57:43 UTC-0400 (Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:57:43 -0400)
Thirumurugan Kalapatti
is rumored to have said:
>> Don't put the filename in double-quotes. The correct setting is:
> > mydestination = $mydomain, $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost,
> /etc/postifx/local-host-names
> Don't put the filename in double-quotes. The correct setting is:
> mydestination = $mydomain, $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost,
/etc/postifx/local-host-names
Thanks for your time and suggestions.
Doing this, "removing the quotes", makes postfix to complain saying...
while restarti
> On 16 Jul 2021, at 10:42 am, Thirumurugan Kalapatti
> wrote:
>
> mydestination = $mydomain, $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost,
> "/etc/postifx/local-host-names"
>
> with local-host-names with the list of local hosts does not seem to help.
Don't put the filename in double-quotes.
Thanks for the quick response. These are sometimes generated by cron jobs
and other times by users
with entrenched behaviour.
The simplest fix for us would be to make our mail server to accept all
mails addressed
user@ALL_localhosts (short form) and
user@ALL_localhosts.domain.com (FQDN)
in a
On 16.07.21 10:42, Thirumurugan Kalapatti wrote:
We have a few dozen linux clients with one system setup as the post
mail relay server.
like host1, host2, host3 hostn all setup to use hostM as mail
relay host. These hosts just relay through hostM. They all
share the namespace in terms of a
Hello
Our setup is rather simple.
We have a few dozen linux clients with one system setup as the post
mail relay server.
like host1, host2, host3 hostn all setup to use hostM as mail
relay host. These hosts just relay through hostM. They all
share the namespace in terms of account/username
On 2021-07-16 at 03:12:38 UTC-0400 (Fri, 16 Jul 2021 17:12:38 +1000)
raf
is rumored to have said:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:51:25PM +1000, raf wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:35:15PM -0400, Bill Cole
wrote:
On 2021-07-13 at 21:18:46 UTC-0400 (Wed, 14 Jul 2021 11:18:46 +1000)
raf
is r
Wietse Venema:
> Mehmet Avcioglu:
> > Wietse Venema:
> > > Then I suspect that the code reaches the 1 limit because
> > > there are ~1 files in the queue.
> >
> > > Below is a patch that should fix this.
> >
> > Thank you for the patch. I had previously said that we were not
> > runni
Mehmet Avcioglu:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Then I suspect that the code reaches the 1 limit because
> > there are ~1 files in the queue.
>
> > Below is a patch that should fix this.
>
> Thank you for the patch. I had previously said that we were not
> running 'showq' or 'postqueue -p' freq
Wietse Venema:
> Then I suspect that the code reaches the 1 limit because
> there are ~1 files in the queue.
> Below is a patch that should fix this.
Thank you for the patch. I had previously said that we were not
running 'showq' or 'postqueue -p' frequently, but upon further
investig
On 2021-07-16 09:12, raf wrote:
According to this:
https://postmarkapp.com/blog/proof-dkim-and-senderid-improve-delivery
please stay away from senderid, its depricated
and stop using spf-milters or opendmarc with libspf2 with aswell
validate senderid, libspf2 is not latest spf rfcs as last
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 05:12:38PM +1000, raf wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:51:25PM +1000, raf wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:35:15PM -0400, Bill Cole
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 2021-07-13 at 21:18:46 UTC-0400 (Wed, 14 Jul 2021 11:18:46 +1000)
> > > raf
> > > is rumored to have
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:51:25PM +1000, raf wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 10:35:15PM -0400, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> > On 2021-07-13 at 21:18:46 UTC-0400 (Wed, 14 Jul 2021 11:18:46 +1000)
> > raf
> > is rumored to have said:
> >
> > > I'm beginning to think that DKIM headers might be
> >
17 matches
Mail list logo
