John Schmerold:
> On 12/22/2020 3:10 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:57:13PM -0600, John Schmerold wrote:
> >
> >> I should have looked at the log before sending this note. Postfix is
> >> including a " orig_to=" header when sending to the destination server,
> >> that is
On 12/22/2020 3:10 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:57:13PM -0600, John Schmerold wrote:
I should have looked at the log before sending this note. Postfix is
including a " orig_to=" header when sending to the destination server,
that is causing our problem.
There is no suc
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:57:13PM -0600, John Schmerold wrote:
> I should have looked at the log before sending this note. Postfix is
> including a " orig_to=" header when sending to the destination server,
> that is causing our problem.
There is no such thing as an "orig_to=" header.
> Is th
On 12/22/2020 2:31 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
John Schmerold:
I want messages sent to lo...@tld1.com to be redirected to
lo...@redirected.com
Until this morning, adding canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
to main.cf got the job done.
canonical contained:
@tld1.com @redirected.com
N
John Schmerold:
> I want messages sent to lo...@tld1.com to be redirected to
> lo...@redirected.com
>
> Until this morning, adding canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
> to main.cf got the job done.
>
> canonical contained:
>@tld1.com @redirected.com
>
> Now the remote server is re
I want messages sent to lo...@tld1.com to be redirected to
lo...@redirected.com
Until this morning, adding canonical_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
to main.cf got the job done.
canonical contained:
@tld1.com @redirected.com
Now the remote server is rejecting the message with this error
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:26:08PM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> > Your suspicions are unfounded. The client is rejecting the server's
> > certificate chain with a fatal certificate unknown alert. That's the
> > issue to fix. All else is distraction.
>
> After reviewing Postix logs with smtpd
James B. Byrne:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ]
>
>
> On Tue, December 22, 2020 13:27, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> >
> > Your suspicions are unfounded. The client is rejecting the server's
> > certificate chain with a fatal certificate unknown alert. That's the
> > issue to fix. All else i
On Tue, December 22, 2020 13:27, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> Your suspicions are unfounded. The client is rejecting the server's
> certificate chain with a fatal certificate unknown alert. That's the
> issue to fix. All else is distraction.
>
After reviewing Postix logs with smtpd_tls_loggin
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 01:21:06PM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> > You could hypothetically have different certificate settings for
> > the different ports in master.cf, but if you don't then indeed
> > the server side TLS behaviour is likely the same across the board.
>
> I do not. And, I beli
On Tue, December 22, 2020 12:46, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 09:24:27AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> > It clearly supports STARTTLS, since it is actually performing the TLS
>> > handshake, and abandons it after receiving certificates it is not happy
>> > with.
>>
>> Whi
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:57:48AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Dec 22 10:10:08 mx32 postfix-p25/smtpd[12694]: SSL_accept:SSLv3/TLS read
> client hello
> Dec 22 10:10:08 mx32 postfix-p25/smtpd[12694]: SSL_accept:SSLv3/TLS write
> server hello
> Dec 22 10:10:08 mx32 postfix-p25/smtpd[12694]: SS
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 09:24:27AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> > It clearly supports STARTTLS, since it is actually performing the TLS
> > handshake, and abandons it after receiving certificates it is not happy
> > with.
>
> Which confuses me, because I can use java to successfully negotiate a
I have been looking at the Postfix logs and wonder if this is significant:
Dec 22 10:10:08 mx32 postfix-p25/smtpd[12694]: SSL_accept:SSLv3/TLS read client
hello
Dec 22 10:10:08 mx32 postfix-p25/smtpd[12694]: SSL_accept:SSLv3/TLS write
server hello
Dec 22 10:10:08 mx32 postfix-p25/smtpd[12694]: S
Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> >Chris Green:
> >> Is the use of a filename in main.cf possible for any parameter or is
> >> it only applicable to myorigin (or just to a few)?
> >>
> >> I notice that installing postfix on my laptop from the Ubuntu
> >> repositories has set myorigin = /etc/mailname in mai
Chris Green:
Is the use of a filename in main.cf possible for any parameter or is
it only applicable to myorigin (or just to a few)?
I notice that installing postfix on my laptop from the Ubuntu
repositories has set myorigin = /etc/mailname in main.cf.
This is handy in relation to my 'how to sy
On Mon, December 21, 2020 20:07, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> It clearly supports STARTTLS, since it is actually performing the TLS
> handshake, and abandons it after receiving certificates it is not happy
> with.
>
Which confuses me, because I can use java to successfully negotiate a
certificate
On Mon, December 21, 2020 20:00, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> If you are able to connect via 465, then maybe the application just isn't
> designed to use "inline" TLS, but rather uses only SMTP-over-TLS? The latter
> is supported on port 465, while submission via port 587 requires first
> plaintext
On Mon, December 21, 2020 16:12, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> This test connects to a DIFFERENT Postfix service than the Javamail client.
> This proves NOTHING about the service that the Javamail client connects to.
>
We are discussing this at cross-purposes. I understand that the service at 465
19 matches
Mail list logo
