I hope no one minds if I change the subject since SSL was no longer the topic.
Regarding multiple from fields, I found this on serverfault :
http://serverfault.com/questions/554520/smtp-allows-for-multiple-from-addresses-in-the-rfc-was-this-ever-useful-why-do
I could almost see this being legiti
On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 03:55:45 PM Alice Wonder wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 02:22 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer.
> >
> > There may be a problem between DMARC and mailing lists - I avoid
> > p=reject or p=quarantine on domains I use for posting to mailing
> > lists.
> >
On 02/15/2017 02:22 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
Thanks for your answer.
There may be a problem between DMARC and mailing lists - I avoid
p=reject or p=quarantine on domains I use for posting to mailing
lists.
SPF proves sender identity but final recipient MTA cannot rely on it
if there are any
Thanks a lot Viktor, I'm going check this!
De: Viktor Dukhovni [via Postfix]
Enviado: quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 19:01:42
Para: luistkd4
Assunto: Re: Error authentication with NTLM
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 3:02 PM, luistkd4 <[hidden
> email]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 3:02 PM, luistkd4
> wrote:
>
> Viktor I change my smtpd.com, follow:
>
> log_level: 7
> pwcheck_method: auxprop
> mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 NTLM
> saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux
> ntlm_v2: yes
> ntlm_server: serverad.local
>
> ntlm_server i set m
Thanks all for help.
Viktor I change my smtpd.com, follow:
log_level: 7
pwcheck_method: auxprop
mech_list: PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 NTLM
saslauthd_path: /var/run/saslauthd/mux
ntlm_v2: yes
ntlm_server: serverad.local
ntlm_server i set my active directory, so now I can connect but have ne
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:36:52PM +, Luis Miguel Flores dos Santos wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying authentic in smtp(587) in postfix using iphone with NTLM but I
> have this errors:
To do NTLM authentication your mail server must be a member computer
of a Windows Domain, configured to authenticate
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 02:04:55PM +0100, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> I'm wondering if it is possible for two parameters, let's say (not
> particularly those, generally):
>
> sender_canonical_maps = sth1, sth2, sth3
> recipient_canonical_maps = sth4, sth5, sth6
>
> 1. For `sender_canonical_maps' pr
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:51 AM, Henry wrote:
>
> For example say our public domain is mydomain.com and we have a
> certificate for mail.mydomain.com and our MX points to
> mail.mydomain.com
So far fairly typical.
> Our mail server called hermes runs our our lan whose domain is mydomain.local
>
On 2/15/2017 11:13 AM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 02:18 PM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/15/2017 02:04 PM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
>>> sender_canonical_maps = sth1, sth2, sth3
>>
>> One more question:
>>
>> Is it possible to apply different `sender_canonical_classes' for sth1,
>> sth2
Yes, because some printers need this to work and all iphones are configured
this by default, but if change authentic to "password" word but NTLM MD5 or
HTTP MD5 Digest don't work
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Error-authentication-with-NTLM-tp88865p5.h
On 2/15/2017 11:24 AM, luistkd4 wrote:
> Do you know how fix it? Because I need its work
>
Try the support channels for cyrus. Postfix is just the messenger
telling you that your cyrus doesn't work.
And are you sure you *require* NTLM? That sounds wonky to me. I
expect you can fix it by not o
Do you know how fix it? Because I need its work
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Error-authentication-with-NTLM-tp88865p3.html
Sent from the Postfix Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 02/15/2017 02:18 PM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 02:04 PM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
>> sender_canonical_maps = sth1, sth2, sth3
>
> One more question:
>
> Is it possible to apply different `sender_canonical_classes' for sth1,
> sth2 and sth3 respectively?
OK, I'll explain it more thor
On 02/15/2017 05:07 PM, Mickaël DEQUIDT wrote:
>
> Le 15/02/2017 à 17:00, Marek Kozlowski a écrit :
>> But I don't want postsrsd to manipulate "from:" header fields. How can I
>> achieve it?
>
> I believe setting :
>
> sender_canonical_classes = envelope_sender
>
> should do the trick : as long
Do you know how fix it? Because I need its work
De: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org em nome
de Luis Miguel Flores dos Santos
Enviado: quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 10:36:52
Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
Assunto: Error authentication with NTLM
Hi, I'm
Le 15/02/2017 à 17:00, Marek Kozlowski a écrit :
But I don't want postsrsd to manipulate "from:" header fields. How can I
achieve it?
I believe setting :
sender_canonical_classes = envelope_sender
should do the trick : as long as you don't specify "header_sender" in
sender_canonical_classe
On 2/15/2017 10:00 AM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> I need canonical for rewriting senders' addresses (both: "MAIL FROM:"
> and "from:" to completely different ones and I decided to add postsrsd.
> But I don't want postsrsd to manipulate "from:" header fields. How can I
> achieve it?
That would need
On 02/15/2017 04:26 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 2/15/2017 7:18 AM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
>>>
>>> That is: `sender_canonical_maps' allows several rewrites for a single
>>> entry while `recipient_canonical_maps' only one (the very first found).
>>
>> One more question:
>>
>> Is it possible to apply d
Many thanks to Dr. Venema for all the hard work he has done in
developing one of the greatest software programs around.
I would also like to thank him (together with many others) for his
unending patience in answering my, sometimes moronic, questions.
Thank you very much.
John A
On 2017-02
On 2/15/2017 6:36 AM, Luis Miguel Flores dos Santos wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying authentic in smtp(587) in postfix using iphone
> with NTLM but I have this errors:
...
> unknown[0.0.0.0]: 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 NTLM
...
> Feb 15 11:52:29 ubmsa01test postfix/smtpd[30317]: *warning: SA
On 2/15/2017 7:18 AM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> That is: `sender_canonical_maps' allows several rewrites for a single
>> entry while `recipient_canonical_maps' only one (the very first found).
>
> One more question:
>
> Is it possible to apply different `sender_canonical_classes' for sth1,
> s
On 02/15/2017 02:04 PM, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> :-)
>
> I'm wondering if it is possible for two parameters, let's say (not
> particularly those, generally):
>
> sender_canonical_maps = sth1, sth2, sth3
> recipient_canonical_maps = sth4, sth5, sth6
>
> (`sth' is any source, it doesn't matter I h
:-)
I'm wondering if it is possible for two parameters, let's say (not
particularly those, generally):
sender_canonical_maps = sth1, sth2, sth3
recipient_canonical_maps = sth4, sth5, sth6
(`sth' is any source, it doesn't matter I hope) to force the following
behavor:
1. For `sender_canonical_ma
Hi, I'm trying authentic in smtp(587) in postfix using iphone with NTLM but I
have this errors:
Feb 15 11:52:29 ubmsa01test postfix/smtpd[30317]: match_list_match: 0.0.0.0: no
match
Feb 15 11:52:29 ubmsa01test postfix/smtpd[30317]: > unknown[0.0.0.0]:
250-UBSMTPPROXY01
Feb 15 11:52:29 ubmsa01te
Henry:
> When reading through main.cf and configuring postfix I am unsure of
> which domain, origin and hostname values to use.
myhostname is the unique name that the MTA will use in a) server
greetings, b) EHLO commands, and c) in delivery status notifications.
Because of b) it is important that
Hello,
On Server2, configure bounce_notice_recipient to a e-mail address that
is located on server1.
By default it's using Postmaster.
Otherwise, on Server2, forward mail from the Postmaster account to server2.
Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Dear all,
I need to find a workaround an issue I am facing
On 15 February 2017 at 10:51, Henry wrote:
> When reading through main.cf and configuring postfix I am unsure of
> which domain, origin and hostname values to use.
>
> For example say our public domain is mydomain.com and we have a
> certificate for mail.mydomain.com and our MX points to
> mail.my
On 15 February 2017 8:34:55 PM AEDT, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 4:27 AM, Henry wrote:
>>
>> With this being the case what is the point of using SSL certificates
>> for sending?
>
>I repeat myself. Typically none. They largely only cause some harm.
>
>> There is a long d
When reading through main.cf and configuring postfix I am unsure of
which domain, origin and hostname values to use.
For example say our public domain is mydomain.com and we have a
certificate for mail.mydomain.com and our MX points to
mail.mydomain.com
Our mail server called hermes runs our our
On 15 February 2017 at 09:34, Alice Wonder wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 12:32 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>>
>> On 15 February 2017 at 07:58, Richard James Salts
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15 February 2017 6:47:31 PM AEDT, Viktor Dukhovni
>>> wrote:
Please do not encourage novice users
On 02/15/2017 01:27 AM, Henry wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Feb 15, 2017, at 2:47 AM, Henry wrote:
So you are saying there is no point in securing outbound email in postfix?
I am saying SSL certificates on the sending side have nothing (good)
to do with
On 02/15/2017 12:32 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 15 February 2017 at 07:58, Richard James Salts
wrote:
On 15 February 2017 6:47:31 PM AEDT, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
Please do not encourage novice users to configure DMARC. This does
much
more harm than good. DMARC is legitimately for the f
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 4:27 AM, Henry wrote:
>
> With this being the case what is the point of using SSL certificates
> for sending?
I repeat myself. Typically none. They largely only cause some harm.
> There is a long discussion on using is here however I am
> not unsure of the purpose.
Cer
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 2:47 AM, Henry wrote:
>>
>> So you are saying there is no point in securing outbound email in postfix?
>
> I am saying SSL certificates on the sending side have nothing (good)
> to do with securing outbound mail.
Wi
On 02/14/2017 11:17 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 15, 2017, at 2:10 AM, Henry wrote:
When I send a message to Gmail I am informed that it could not be
authenticated and will probably end in the spam folder.
This is largely misinformation. Sites that send bulk mail that might
get classi
This breaks milter_macro_defaults lookups, which always require the
form {name}. This would have been found immediately if the library
had tests.
Wietse
I don't use the new milter_macro_defaults feature yet, so Viktors patch
is ok for now.
Hope you can find a good long term solution,
Dear all,
I need to find a workaround an issue I am facing due to the limitation of
an external product I am using to send/receive emails.
Long story short:
- 2 postfix servers acting both as sending as receiving servers from/to the
Internet.
- 1 application server sending to the Internet via both
On 15 February 2017 at 07:58, Richard James Salts
wrote:
>
>
> On 15 February 2017 6:47:31 PM AEDT, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>>
>>Please do not encourage novice users to configure DMARC. This does
>>much
>>more harm than good. DMARC is legitimately for the few likePayPal,
>>abusively
>>for too
39 matches
Mail list logo
