On 02/15/2017 02:04 PM, Marek Kozlowski wrote: > :-) > > I'm wondering if it is possible for two parameters, let's say (not > particularly those, generally): > > sender_canonical_maps = sth1, sth2, sth3 > recipient_canonical_maps = sth4, sth5, sth6 > > (`sth' is any source, it doesn't matter I hope) to force the following > behavor: > > 1. For `sender_canonical_maps' processing all three tables sequentially > 2. For `recipient_canonical_maps' processing the tables until the first > matching entry is found; if found in let's say `sth5' then `sth6' will > be ignored. > > That is: `sender_canonical_maps' allows several rewrites for a single > entry while `recipient_canonical_maps' only one (the very first found).
One more question: Is it possible to apply different `sender_canonical_classes' for sth1, sth2 and sth3 respectively? Best ragrads, Marek
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
