On 01 Nov 2016, at 07:21, Bill Cole
wrote:
>
> Please, humor me: set syslog_name and retest.
I have set it, but the occurrence of amavis sending a virus alert is quite
rare. The last one before this was more than a month ago. Not sure how to force
amavis to generate a virus alert.
> Your pos
On 02/11/16 03:41, Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:38 PM, André Rodier mailto:an...@rodier.me>> wrote:
Hello all!
I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM,
SPF and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere,
because the "Authe
On 02/11/16 00:52, Bill Cole wrote:
On 1 Nov 2016, at 16:11, Andre Rodier wrote:
Hello all!
I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM,
SPF and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because
the "Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail":
Doe
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:38 PM, André Rodier wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF
> and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because the
> "Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail":
>
> Does anyone knows why
On 1 Nov 2016, at 16:11, Andre Rodier wrote:
Hello all!
I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM,
SPF and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because
the "Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail":
Does anyone knows why, please?
Not
Todd C. Olson:
> which has been hard since I don't yet have a full gestalt of how
> postfix works.
My recommendation: don't try to do complex things with Postfix
until you are familiar with how the relevant parts of Postfix work.
Develop a system step-by-step, instead of doing it all at once.
Yo
Hi
Hum ... this conversation has alerted me to the possibility that
virtual_alias_maps has two different roles ... I am/have_been confused on this
despite spending weeks pondering the documentation. Is the following summary
correct and complete? If so, then the proposed additions to postconf.
Hello all!
I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF
and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because the
"Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail":
Does anyone knows why, please? I have send an email to an online DMARC
test, and di
Hello all!
I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF
and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because the
"Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail":
Does anyone knows why, please? I have send an email to an online DMARC
test, and di
Hello all!
I have set up my postfix server, and my DNS entries to support DKIM, SPF
and DMARC. However, I think I may have an error somewhere, because the
"Authentication-Results:" header for DMARC -s "fail":
Does anyone knows why, please? I have send an email to an online DMARC
test, and di
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:17:10AM -0400, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> I am not sure what I want. The smtp_bind_address has been in the
> config for ages, possibly added by someone else. I don't mind if
> Postfix listens on all interfaces and I can't even imagine a
> scenario where I would want to lim
Chris:
> In main.cf smtp-amavis is an internet socket, isn't it?
>
> content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
delivery agent-^^^ ^^^---delivery destination
main.cf says that the delivery agent smtp-amavis will make a
connection to internet socket [127.0.0.1]:10024.
D'Arcy Cain:
> I am not sure what I want. The smtp_bind_address has been in the config
> for ages, possibly added by someone else. I don't mind if Postfix
> listens on all interfaces and I can't even imagine a scenario where I
> would want to limit outgoing interfaces.
These days smtp_bind_ad
On 2016-10-31 03:39 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 03:20:29PM -0400, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
Is this expected behaviour? I set smtp_bind_address to our
external interface to receive email
It affects outbound *only* ... it has nothing to do with mail
reception.
Doh! I keep thinking
On 31 Oct 2016, at 23:17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Oct 31, 2016, at 10:49 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
virtual_alias_domains = kreme.com
virtual_alias_maps = hash:$config_directory/virtual
proxy:mysql:$config_directory/mysql_virtual_alias_maps.cf
So: on what basis would you expect virusal..
Hello,
I am trying to set up my postfix server so that it sends outgoing emails
having a from address matching *@pobox.com to the server smtp.pobox.com,
using port 587. As this rule is matching from addresses, and pobox.com is
not the final destination, smtp.pobox.com requires authentication.
I
On 1 Nov 2016, at 1:46, @lbutlr wrote:
On Oct 31, 2016, at 8:49 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
On 31 Oct 2016, at 22:04, @lbutlr wrote:
On 31 Oct 2016, at 17:08, wilfried.es...@essignetz.de wrote:
Am 31.10.2016 um 23:51 schrieb @lbutlr:
...
No loglines of the denied mail?
Sure. Ut gives the sa
Florian Piekert:
> Hello,
>
> the Halloween Edition 1031 of pf 3.2 seems to have some issues on my system,
> resulting in
>
> mail.log
> Nov 1 13:46:20 bhaal postfix/master[3558]: warning: process
> /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 3612 killed by signal 11
> Nov 1 13:46:20 bhaal postfix/master[3558]:
Thanks for the responses to my previous post regarding DKIM signatures,
I have DMARC working as well and testing some new SA rules now.
I want to LDAP SigningTable and KeyTable, where we already have Postfix
transport and other lookup records. But I continue to receive no signing
table match u
Hello,
the Halloween Edition 1031 of pf 3.2 seems to have some issues on my system,
resulting in
mail.log
Nov 1 13:46:20 bhaal postfix/master[3558]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/smtpd pid 3612 killed by signal 11
Nov 1 13:46:20 bhaal postfix/master[3558]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd:
b
Christian Ro??ner:
>
> > Am 25.10.2016 um 08:22 schrieb Wietse Venema :
> >
> > Wietse Venema:
> >> Wietse Venema:
> >>> Looks like either 1) an exclusion mechanism or 2) a selection
> >>> mechanism would do the job.
> >>>
> >>> 1) Nullifies the smtpd_milters setting depending on the client.
> >
Sorry, the port in my example should be 10027:
Set in amavisd configs:
$notify_method = 'smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10027';
Willi
> Am 25.10.2016 um 08:22 schrieb Wietse Venema :
>
> Wietse Venema:
>> Wietse Venema:
>>> Looks like either 1) an exclusion mechanism or 2) a selection
>>> mechanism would do the job.
>>>
>>> 1) Nullifies the smtpd_milters setting depending on the client.
>>>
>>> 2) Chooses the smtpd_milters se
Am 01.11.2016 um 06:46 schrieb @lbutlr:
...
>>> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
>>>-o content_filter=
>>>-o local_recipient_maps=
>>>-o relay_recipient_maps=
>>>-o smtpd_restriction_classes=
>>>-o smtpd_client_restrictions=
>>>-o smtpd_helo_res
24 matches
Mail list logo
