> On Mar 3, 2016, at 2:12 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can some one give working migation intructions for postfix 2.3
> (postfix-2.3.3-7.el5) many of instructions are not working correctly on so
> old version. (as settings are not supported)
Postfix 2.3 is too old for the required c
Hi,
Can some one give working migation intructions for postfix 2.3
(postfix-2.3.3-7.el5)
many of instructions are not working correctly on so old version. (as
settings are not supported)
thanks,
--
Eero
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:27:26PM +1000, Brett @Google wrote:
>
> > I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> > are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
> > library formats whe
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:22:12PM -0700, Richard B. Pyne wrote:
> I've added all but the forward secrecy part on my email server running
> postfix 2.10.1 (the latest in the CentOS7 repository), and
> test.drownattack.com still reports vulnerability on port 25. Any help will
> be greatly appreciat
I've added all but the forward secrecy part on my email server running
postfix 2.10.1 (the latest in the CentOS7 repository), and
test.drownattack.com still reports vulnerability on port 25. Any help
will be greatly appreciated.
postconf -nf
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = has
Not enough information to even guess what is going on. In my apps when I accept an email address, I use a little bit of ajax to
verify the domain:
if ($email != '') {
$tmp = explode('@', $email);
if (isset($tmp[1])) {
$got_mx = getmxrr($tmp[1], $mxhosts);
if ($got_mx) {
On 03/03/16 08:58, wilfried.es...@essignetz.de wrote:
>> I was guessing that this would have to be aliased but didn't see it in the
>> documentation for
>> canonical. Is it the correct way to set up full.name mapping to local users?
>> Also I'm more used to
>> sendmail and qmail. This is my first
> I was guessing that this would have to be aliased but didn't see it in the
> documentation for
> canonical. Is it the correct way to set up full.name mapping to local users?
> Also I'm more used to
> sendmail and qmail. This is my first time configuring postfix.
Correct is probably the wrong w
On 03/03/16 08:02, wilfried.es...@essignetz.de wrote:
>
> Am 02.03.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Tom Robinson:
>> On 03/03/16 06:33, wilfried.es...@essignetz.de wrote:
>>> Am 02.03.2016 um 06:32 schrieb Tom Robinson:
Hi,
I'm trying to map users to first.last in canonical but I get
an e
On 03/03/16 07:52, Tom Robinson wrote:
> On 03/03/16 06:33, wilfried.es...@essignetz.de wrote:
>> Am 02.03.2016 um 06:32 schrieb Tom Robinson:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to map users to first.last in canonical but I get an
>>> error when sending email to the canonicalized address
>>> first.last@dom
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:01:35PM +0100, Dietrich Streifert wrote:
> Ah OK! This log entries may be helpfull:
>
> 135125:Mar 2 18:32:55 node1 postfix/smtp[9047]: 5B0A235E18A: Cannot start
> TLS: handshake failure
> 135131:Mar 2 18:32:55 node1 postfix/cleanup[22956]: 7D9B335E185:
> message-id=<
Am 02.03.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Tom Robinson:
> On 03/03/16 06:33, wilfried.es...@essignetz.de wrote:
>> Am 02.03.2016 um 06:32 schrieb Tom Robinson:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to map users to first.last in canonical but I get
>>> an error when sending email to the canonicalized address
>>> first
Ah OK! This log entries may be helpfull:
135125:Mar 2 18:32:55 node1 postfix/smtp[9047]: 5B0A235E18A: Cannot
start TLS: handshake failure
135131:Mar 2 18:32:55 node1 postfix/cleanup[22956]: 7D9B335E185:
message-id=<20160302172755.5b0a235e...@..de>
135133:Mar 2 18:32:55 node1 postfix/
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:27:26PM +1000, Brett @Google wrote:
> I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
> library formats when compared to Linux.
As Wietse said, nothing relevant changed in
--On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:27 PM +1000 "Brett @Google"
wrote:
Hello,
I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
library formats when compared to Linux.
(running on SunOS server 5.10
--On Monday, October 07, 2013 3:16 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
wrote:
--On Monday, October 07, 2013 6:07 PM + Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
Note, the new "%" substitution pattern for a comma-separated
list of DC= components is "%," not "%". I hope that's reasonably
clear in the patch documen
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:52:26PM -0600, helices wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> > Simplest is to have SA invoke your filter instead of sendmail(1).
> >
> > spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
> > user=spamd argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e
> > /
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 12:36:06PM -0500, Ron Guerin wrote:
> I've been running three instances of Postfix on Debian since about 2011.
> Originally I had to modify the init script, but the one Debian ships in
> more recent years handles multi-instance Postfix properly.
The init script starts mul
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> Simplest is to have SA invoke your filter instead of sendmail(1).
>
> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
> user=spamd argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e
> /var/spool/filter/bin/filter.sh -f ${sender} -- ${recipient}
>
I tried exa
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:40:17PM -0600, Mike Schleif wrote:
> How need I configure postfix to first use spamassassin, then use
> "filter?"
>
> What am I missing?
Amavisd-new? This is precisely what amavisd-new is for: invoking
multiple filters in one stop.
Spamassassin is built-in, assuming
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:40:17PM -0600, Mike Schleif wrote:
> Original filter-only:
> master.cf:
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o content_filter=filter:dummy
>
> filter unix - n n - 10 pipe
> flags=Rq user=filter null_sender=
> argv=/var/spool/filter/bin/filter.sh -f ${sende
Centos: 7.2.1511 (Core)
postfix: 2.10.1
This postfix server was designed to run as follows, which it has done for
several months without incident:
Original filter-only:
master.cf:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
filter unix - n n - 10 pipe
flags=Rq use
Am 02.03.2016 um 06:32 schrieb Tom Robinson:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to map users to first.last in canonical but I get an
> error when sending email to the canonicalized address
> first.last@domain:
...
> My Error: Mar 2 15:47:36 camber policyd-spf[17984]: None;
> identity=helo; client-ip=10.0.6.3;
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:09:54PM +0100, Dietrich Streifert wrote:
> I'm using php mail to send mails which uses /usr/sbin/sendmail -t -i to
> send the mail.
>
> On my previous server centos 6 using postfix 2.6.6 the mail was delivered
> nearly instant to the recipient, whereas on centos 7 with
> "Dietrich" == Dietrich Streifert
> writes:
Dietrich> I'm running centos 7.2 with postfix 2.10.1, installed from the
standard
Dietrich> centos 7 repo which corresponds to rhel 7.
Dietrich> I'm using php mail to send mails which uses /usr/sbin/sendmail -t -i
to
Dietrich> send the m
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:31:44AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:49:35PM +0100, Karel wrote:
I am running small Postfix server for personal use. My logs are
flooded with:
relay access denied
hello rejects
connection rate limit exceeded ...
lost connection after AUTH
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Dietrich Streifert
wrote:
> Hi Mauricio,
>
> no, there is nothing in the log file. Here is the output for one sending
> attempt:
>
> mail() on [/data/development/phpmail/mail.php:9]: To:
> dietrich.streif...@googlemail.com -- Headers: From: nore...@.de
> Reply-
Hi Mauricio,
no, there is nothing in the log file. Here is the output for one sending
attempt:
mail() on [/data/development/phpmail/mail.php:9]: To:
dietrich.streif...@googlemail.com -- Headers: From: nore...@.de
Reply-To: s...@.de X-Mailer: PHP/5.4.16
Mar 2 18:27:55 node1 postfi
On 3/2/2016 11:19 AM, Christian Renner wrote:
> On 25/02/16 15:30, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> As Postfix has not changed, this is a platform-specific (maybe
>> even site-specific) problem. Have you asked your software provider
>> for help?
>
> Problem is solved now and yes, it was some kind of
> pla
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:49:35PM +0100, Karel wrote:
> I am running small Postfix server for personal use. My logs are
> flooded with:
>
> relay access denied
> hello rejects
> connection rate limit exceeded ...
> lost connection after AUTH from ...
>
> Often there are hundreds of thes
Hey guys,
I am struggling with the following setup; I need to set up a postfix
server accepting everything (from a single domain; say abc.domain.com)
and save it locally even when the e-mail box does not exist.
The latter part is covered by a procmail script and is not a biggy,
however, deliveri
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Dietrich Streifert
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running centos 7.2 with postfix 2.10.1, installed from the standard
> centos 7 repo which corresponds to rhel 7.
>
> I'm using php mail to send mails which uses /usr/sbin/sendmail -t -i to
> send the mail.
>
> On my prev
Hi all,
I'm running centos 7.2 with postfix 2.10.1, installed from the standard
centos 7 repo which corresponds to rhel 7.
I'm using php mail to send mails which uses /usr/sbin/sendmail -t -i to
send the mail.
On my previous server centos 6 using postfix 2.6.6 the mail was
delivered nearl
On 25/02/16 15:30, Wietse Venema wrote:
As Postfix has not changed, this is a platform-specific (maybe even
site-specific) problem. Have you asked your software provider for
help?
Problem is solved now and yes, it was some kind of platform-specific.
We're running multiple chrooted instances o
On 26/02/16 08:57 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:16:43AM -0800, Jack Bates wrote:
Hmmm ... That is what's happening, but why's there no user context?
I expected the first case ("the rights of the receiving user on whose
behalf the delivery is made") vs. the second ("the
On 3/2/2016 1:30 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:32:02PM -0500, Ron Guerin wrote:
>
>> On 2/29/2016 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> For submission of list messages to a large number of recipients,
>>> I would generally use sendmail(1) rather than SMTP. Don't know
>>>
on postfix?
I'm not a php developer but I look after a postfix server
and I wonder if you might know what might be the cause for a
(simple) php app to sort of hang on email address bit when
it is incorrect - and it is even not the app itself that
validates the address - web page sort of refre
> "Karel" == Karel writes:
Karel> I am running small Postfix server for personal use. My logs are flooded
Karel> with:
Karel> relay access denied
Karel> hello rejects
Karel> connection rate limit exceeded ...
Karel> lost connection after AUTH from ...
Karel> Often there are hundred
> Does this process have to be so complicated ? Is there no easier way to
> block offending IP addresses using iptables ?
So, first off, everybody's mail logs are loaded with spammers' failed attempts
to send us mail. I consider it a badge of honor to have so many bozos turned
down! However, as
I am running small Postfix server for personal use. My logs are flooded
with:
relay access denied
hello rejects
connection rate limit exceeded ...
lost connection after AUTH from ...
Often there are hundreds of these logs from the same IP address. I know,
that I can use fail2ban to block
Brett @Google:
> Hello,
>
> I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
> are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
> library formats when compared to Linux.
>
> (running on SunOS server 5.10 Generic_150400-29 sun4v sparc sun4v)
The chanc
Hello,
I am upgrading 3.0.x to 3.1 it seems the build process has changed, there
are a few issues at least on solaris, maybe due to the dual 32/64 bit
library formats when compared to Linux.
(running on SunOS server 5.10 Generic_150400-29 sun4v sparc sun4v)
1. Is seems to be no longer possible t
42 matches
Mail list logo
