On 2/17/2016 4:45 PM, Vernon Fort wrote:
> Actually studying this now. The DNS records the marketing company want me to
> add are:
>
> Domainkey_Policy _domainkey.ocompany.net TXT
> "t=yl; o=~;"
> _domainkey.othercompany.net 200608._domainkey.ocompany
> Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 17:40:44 -0500
> From: kazabe
>
> hi.
>
> i some users are reporting me to they are receiving many copies of
> the same message. the remitent just send 1 message and the
> recipient receipt 7 or more copies of the same message.
>
> we check the send mail f
On Behalf Of Noel Jones, February 17, 2016 4:00 PM
>Your unsigned messages won't (shouldn't?) be affected as long as you don't
>publish a DMARC policy indicating that all mail must be signed. I suppose you
>could publish a >DMARC policy indicating DKIM is optional to make that
>explicit, but tha
hi.
i some users are reporting me to they are receiving many copies of the same
message. the remitent just send 1 message and the recipient receipt 7 or
more copies of the same message.
we check the send mail folder in the remitent (outlook 2010) and just have
the message sended 1 time.
the cop
On 2/17/2016 2:47 PM, Vernon Fort wrote:
> I’m not sure where to ask this question so I hope postfix is ok.
> When a receiving email server is checking DKIM signatures, does it
> only check IF the signature is present in the message header. Or
> does it always check for a DNS record for the domai
I'm not sure where to ask this question so I hope postfix is ok. When a
receiving email server is checking DKIM signatures, does it only check IF the
signature is present in the message header. Or does it always check for a DNS
record for the domain and then check the email message for a valid
> On Feb 17, 2016, at 5:18 AM, Tobi wrote:
>
> use a regexp on recipient and/or sender domain to reject such messages.
> postfix accepts underscore in domain names as this is a common mistake
> by many legitimate admins
There's little reason to do this. If the domain is resolvable, accept it,
> > > > I consult my colleagues what to do.
Finally they discovered that an other name caching daemon was missing.
Somehow they restarted (systemd sucks) then everything worked as expected.
Gabor
On 2/17/2016 1:56 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:
>>> In the log, it goes on from there like this:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> Feb 16 03:38:48 deinprogramm postfix/submission/smtpd[76503]:
>>> generic_checks: name=permit_mynetworks status=1
>>> Feb 16 03:38:48 deinprogramm postfix/submission/smtpd[76503]: >>> END
Kiss G?bor:
> > > And nsdc also plays in the background. There are several
> > > potentially buggy code everywhere.
> > >
> > > Many thanks for your help. :-)
> > > I consult my colleagues what to do.
> >
> > Please file a bug in any case.
>
> Yes, of course.
>
> > You can hack around in mypwd.
> > And nsdc also plays in the background. There are several
> > potentially buggy code everywhere.
> >
> > Many thanks for your help. :-)
> > I consult my colleagues what to do.
>
> Please file a bug in any case.
Yes, of course.
> You can hack around in mypwd.c, by skipping names that start wi
Kiss G?bor:
> Bingo! :-)
> On old MTA (Debian sqeeze) your demo program works well
> meanwhile on the new one (Debian jessie) it fails:
>
> $ ./getpwnam_r_test +Trash
> +Trash: error: No such file or directory
> $
>
> Unfortunately the situation is bit complicated.
>
> /etc/nsswitch.conf:
> pas
Am 17.02.2016 um 09:30 schrieb Suuuper:
>
> I tried to add reject_non_fqdn_recipient in
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions, but it doesn't work.
>
use a regexp on recipient and/or sender domain to reject such messages.
postfix accepts underscore in domain names as this is a common mistake
by many l
> > What is the back-end for your UNIX system account lookups: is this
> > LDAP, files, or something else? This weekend there was a thread
> > about getpwnam_r() not returning errors when an LDAP server was
> > down. Now we have getpwnam_r() returing errors for non-error lookups.
> > If this is the
Hi,
if i read RFC 2821 (paragraph 2.3.5), the domain can contain only
letters, digits, and hyphen but if i try to write an email with _,
postfix accepts the mails.
Es:
telnet 10.0.8.141 25
ehlo example.com
250-fe.example.org
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 220200960
250-ETRN
250-STARTTLS
250-ENHANCEDSTAT
15 matches
Mail list logo
