On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 04:58:59PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:28:07PM +0200, Vincenzo Lucarini wrote:
> >
> > > it is possible in any manner to apply alias tables (i currently use a
> > > mysql table) based on sender address. I mean i want to
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:28:07PM +0200, Vincenzo Lucarini wrote:
>
> > it is possible in any manner to apply alias tables (i currently use a
> > mysql table) based on sender address. I mean i want to apply alias only for
> > certain domains (i.e. apply alias for every send
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:28:07PM +0200, Vincenzo Lucarini wrote:
> it is possible in any manner to apply alias tables (i currently use a
> mysql table) based on sender address. I mean i want to apply alias only for
> certain domains (i.e. apply alias for every sender except for which one
> b
Hello,
it is possible in any manner to apply alias tables (i currently use a
mysql table) based on sender address. I mean i want to apply alias only for
certain domains (i.e. apply alias for every sender except for which one
belongs to one or more domains).
Regards
Cec
Hello,
it is possible in any manner to apply alias tables (i currently use a
mysql table) based on sender address. I mean i want to apply alias only for
certain domains (i.e. apply alias for every sender except for which one
belongs to one or more domains).
Regards
Cec
Per olof Ljungmark:
> Sent:
>
> --=_rJ0N-qFsVHye8YMhx4uKOaC
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
> Content-Description: Endast text-meddelande
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Bounce:
>
> --=_rJ0N-qFsVHye8YMhx4uKOaC
>
Am 28.08.2015 um 20:28 schrieb Forrest:
> On 8/28/15 2:09 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 28.08.2015 um 20:03 schrieb Forrest:
>>> I've become used to the script kiddies sending out large connection
>>> requests (I do have a threshold set). They are able to get around it by
>>> other connection
On 8/28/15 2:09 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 28.08.2015 um 20:03 schrieb Forrest:
I've become used to the script kiddies sending out large connection
requests (I do have a threshold set). They are able to get around it by
other connections. For example, I had 857 connects of this:
Aug 28 1
Am 28.08.2015 um 20:03 schrieb Forrest:
> I've become used to the script kiddies sending out large connection
> requests (I do have a threshold set). They are able to get around it by
> other connections. For example, I had 857 connects of this:
>
> Aug 28 11:57:35 mail postfix/smtpd[20544]: con
Am 28.08.2015 um 19:56 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark:
>
>
> On 2015-08-28 19:55, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 28.08.2015 um 19:46 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark:
>>> On 2015-08-28 18:07, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Yes, tha
I've become used to the script kiddies sending out large connection
requests (I do have a threshold set). They are able to get around it by
other connections. For example, I had 857 connects of this:
Aug 28 11:57:35 mail postfix/smtpd[20544]: connect from
unknown[5.232.194.77]
Aug 28 11:57:3
On 2015-08-28 19:55, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 28.08.2015 um 19:46 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark:
>> On 2015-08-28 18:07, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>>>
Yes, that helped with Thunderbird but not from Horde/IMP where it stil
Am 28.08.2015 um 19:46 schrieb Per olof Ljungmark:
> On 2015-08-28 18:07, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, that helped with Thunderbird but not from Horde/IMP where it still
>>> bounces the same way.
>>>
>>> The difference see
On 2015-08-28 18:07, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
>> Yes, that helped with Thunderbird but not from Horde/IMP where it still
>> bounces the same way.
>>
>> The difference seems to be that IMP sends a
>> "Content-Transfer-Encoding: q
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>
> > Yes, that helped with Thunderbird but not from Horde/IMP where it still
> > bounces the same way.
> >
> > The difference seems to be that IMP sends a
> > "Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable"
> >
Not sure, but this _MIGHT_ be what you need (YMMV):
http://www.kutukupret.com/2010/01/02/postfix-bind-sender-domain-to-dedicated-outgoing-ip-address/
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] on
behalf of Peter L. Berghold [p
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 04:21:07PM +, Wolfe, Robert wrote:
> Not sure, but this _MIGHT_ be what you need (YMMV):
>
> http://www.kutukupret.com/2010/01/02/postfix-bind-sender-domain-to-dedicated-outgoing-ip-address/
I read the OP's message as wanting to use a particular IP address
for sending
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
> Yes, that helped with Thunderbird but not from Horde/IMP where it still
> bounces the same way.
>
> The difference seems to be that IMP sends a
> "Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable"
>
> and TB
> "Content-Transfer-Enc
On 2015-08-28 12:30, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Per olof Ljungmark:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have a problem with one receiving domain, we see a bounce as in the
>> subject.
>>
>> I think this is an Exchange server that forwards the message to another
>> Exchange box that refuses to receive it.
>
> This crappy
I know you can bind smptd to a specific address for outgoing email. Is
it possible (or even feasible) to run multiple smtpd sessions, tying
each one to a specific IP address and routing email based on domain
name?
For instance:
{most users} ---> smtpd instance 1
{verizon.net}
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:30:48 +0200, dravion.sm...@gmx.net stated:
> really, idiot
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_bind_address
smtp_bind_address (default: empty) ≠ smtpd_bind_address
--
Jerry
On Friday, 28 August, 2015 06:24 PM, Wietse Venema [via Postfix] wrote:
> check_sender_access is not a configuration parameter.
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#check_sender_access
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_sender_restrictions
>
> Wietse
Hi Wietse,
Thanks for
Per olof Ljungmark:
> Hi,
>
> We have a problem with one receiving domain, we see a bounce as in the
> subject.
>
> I think this is an Exchange server that forwards the message to another
> Exchange box that refuses to receive it.
This crappy behavuior is permitted by RFCs: a forwarder either
co
really, idiot
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtp_bind_address
Am 28.08.2015 um 12:27 schrieb Wietse Venema:
dravion.sm...@gmx.net:
[numerous incorrect claims without concrete evidence so that no-one
can determine what mistake was made, except one: there is no Postfix
parameter called sm
dravion.sm...@gmx.net:
[numerous incorrect claims without concrete evidence so that no-one
can determine what mistake was made, except one: there is no Postfix
parameter called smtpd_bind_address].
Wietse
Hi,
We have a problem with one receiving domain, we see a bounce as in the
subject.
I think this is an Exchange server that forwards the message to another
Exchange box that refuses to receive it.
If the problem is in our end, what can be done to mitigate it?
The Echange MX in their end respond
snowweb:
> One user in a client's domain has a virus which is sending many spam emails.
> I've disabled his mail account for now, but shortly, he will tell me it's
> fixed and I'll have to take his word for it.
>
> I'd like to force his outgoing emails into a holding queue for checking and
> to do
Hi John,
I was able to figure out and running Postfix AND Dovecot Multinstancing.
The Dovecot Multiinstance Features works fine, but
Postfix-Multiinstancing (at least under CentOS 7.1 + SELinux enabled)
has some problems with IPv6 port bindings but IPv4 was ok, even if i was
using smtpd_bind_a
One user in a client's domain has a virus which is sending many spam emails.
I've disabled his mail account for now, but shortly, he will tell me it's
fixed and I'll have to take his word for it.
I'd like to force his outgoing emails into a holding queue for checking and
to do this, I have added i
29 matches
Mail list logo
