On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:42 AM, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> On 09 Jun 2015, at 05:20, Michael B Allen wrote:
>
>> I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing
>> everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and
>> mail.busicorp.com.
>>
>> My understanding is the following
I think we're wandering into the reasons why SPF discussions are
usually off-limits on this mailinglist, again.
For further assistance with setting up SPF, and debugging the quirks
you'll run into, use the support resources dedicated to the topic, such
as the ones listed on the OpenSPF website;
I have noticed these failures very often too.
Its a common misconfiguration of servers, when they configure a mail server
to forward right off, instead of encasing the mail in a new
message/rfc822-container that most mail clients do when forwarding. Lazy
server operators.
Many lazy mail serve
On 09 Jun 2015, at 05:20, Michael B Allen wrote:
> I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing
> everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and
> mail.busicorp.com.
>
> My understanding is the following is probably what I want:
>
> v=spf1 mx ~all
>
> Would you ag
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:30:59PM -0400, Alex Regan wrote:
> Jun 8 21:20:03 mail02 postfix[22018]: Postfix is running with
> backwards-compatible default settings
Meaning the compatibility level is not set the requisuite minimum
value. This applies whether or not the relevant parameters have
b
On 08 Jun 2015, at 20:14, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On 2015-06-08 20:06, M. Fioretti wrote:
>> On 2015-06-08 17:46, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
>>> Have you followed the link in the error message, and read the
>>> explanation?
>> Of course I have. But, with all respect, it have to ask if YOU read my email.
I have never setup SPF records before. I have one server doing
everything although it has two names www.busicorp.com and
mail.busicorp.com.
My understanding is the following is probably what I want:
v=spf1 mx ~all
Would you agree?
Mike
Hi,
I've upgraded from postfix-2.10.5 on fedora20 to postfix-3.0.1 on
fedora22 and receiving the backwards-compatibility warning. I've checked
all of the settings on the COMPATIBILITY_README page, and adjusted the
relay_domains setting, which was the only one that applied to my config.
I'm stil
Alex Regan:
> Hi,
>
> >> I've upgraded from postfix-2.10.5 on fedora20 to postfix-3.0.1 on
> >> fedora22 and receiving the backwards-compatibility warning. I've checked
> >> all of the settings on the COMPATIBILITY_README page, and adjusted the
> >> relay_domains setting, which was the only one th
Hi,
I've upgraded from postfix-2.10.5 on fedora20 to postfix-3.0.1 on
fedora22 and receiving the backwards-compatibility warning. I've checked
all of the settings on the COMPATIBILITY_README page, and adjusted the
relay_domains setting, which was the only one that applied to my config.
I'm stil
M. Fioretti:
> As confirmation of my earlier answer, please note the Received: and
> Receive-SPF headers of the
> rejected message, which do NOT report 81.88.62.172 as source, or spf
> failures... So THEY
> acknowledge I emailed from 213.179.193.33, THEY say SPF-pass, then THEY
> reject because
Andrew Beverley:
> On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:58 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > What other TLS settings do you consider required? Postfix does not
> > need a client certificate for sending email.
>
> My mistake. I'd added in some of those settings when I couldn't get it
> working. In actual fact I
On 2015-06-08 20:06, M. Fioretti wrote:
On 2015-06-08 17:46, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
Have you followed the link in the error message, and read the
explanation?
Of course I have. But, with all respect, it have to ask if YOU read my
email.
As confirmation of my earlier answer, please note the
On 2015-06-08 17:46, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
Have you followed the link in the error message, and read the
explanation?
Of course I have. But, with all respect, it have to ask if YOU read my
email.
If I send email from the same computer, webmail etc.. I only get spf
failure
from that and ano
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 04:35:01PM +0100, Andrew Beverley wrote:
> Given that SASL authentication over TLS is becoming more prevalent, I
> think it would be worth adding a small note to this section:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html#client_sasl_enable
>
> stating that "smtp_use_tls =
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:58 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> What other TLS settings do you consider required? Postfix does not
> need a client certificate for sending email.
My mistake. I'd added in some of those settings when I couldn't get it
working. In actual fact I was missing:
smtp_sasl_tls_s
Andrew Beverley:
> Hi,
>
> Just a quick suggestion for the excellent Postfix documentation.
>
> Given that SASL authentication over TLS is becoming more prevalent, I
> think it would be worth adding a small note to this section:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html#client_sasl_enable
>
>
On 08 Jun 2015, at 18:03, M. Fioretti wrote:
> I had my SPF/Dkim setup all set, also thanks to help from this list..
> until 2/3 days ago. Since then, I have received 2/3 rejected messages,
> from unrelated servers, all very similar to the one below, from which
> I have only removed the subject a
Hi,
Just a quick suggestion for the excellent Postfix documentation.
Given that SASL authentication over TLS is becoming more prevalent, I
think it would be worth adding a small note to this section:
http://www.postfix.org/SOHO_README.html#client_sasl_enable
stating that "smtp_use_tls = yes" is
Greetings,
I had my SPF/Dkim setup all set, also thanks to help from this list..
until 2/3 days ago. Since then, I have received 2/3 rejected messages,
from unrelated servers, all very similar to the one below, from which
I have only removed the subject and original body.
I sent that email 10 mi
Alex Regan:
> Hi,
>
> I've upgraded from postfix-2.10.5 on fedora20 to postfix-3.0.1 on
> fedora22 and receiving the backwards-compatibility warning. I've checked
> all of the settings on the COMPATIBILITY_README page, and adjusted the
> relay_domains setting, which was the only one that applie
Yes mate, bingo!
You saved another day that I'd probably spend on troubleshooting this.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#masquerade_domains
This is the answer
P.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Peter wrote:
> On 06/08/2015 08:58 PM, Peter wrote:
> > I use "sendmail -f nore...@mail.exam
On 06/08/2015 08:58 PM, Peter wrote:
> I use "sendmail -f nore...@mail.example.com" to send emails
I hope you actually have some sort of program, script or human
monitoring that address to handle bounces.
> I see that the "from" address is already altered in the
> postfix log file to "nore...@exa
I have been changing my mailing addresses from "example.com" to sub
domains - say "mail.example.com" to configure no-reply addresses there.
I use "sendmail -f nore...@mail.example.com" to send emails to make sure
the Return-Path is correct. My mail delivery chain looks as follows:
SENDING SERVER -
24 matches
Mail list logo
