Greetings,

I had my SPF/Dkim setup all set, also thanks to help from this list..
until 2/3 days ago. Since then, I have received 2/3 rejected messages,
from unrelated servers, all very similar to the one below, from which
I have only removed the subject and original body.

I sent that email 10 minutes ago, the same way as this one: via webmail running on
nexaima.net, connecting to it from ip 188.152.167.47 in Rome, Italy.

I believe that the receiver uses SPF wrongly, because

a) 90% of email sent the
same way to other addresses goes through without problems, I immediately get answers

b) IIUC, the receiver considers as sender 81.88.62.172... which should be the IP of my ISP gateway, not even the one from which **I** am typing now.

is this the case? I mean, is there an error on my side, on theirs, on both?

TIA,
Marco

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Delivery status notification
Date: 2015-06-08 16:12
From: mailer-dae...@register.it
To: mfiore...@nexaima.net

This is the mail system at host paganini31.register.it.

Delivery to the following recipient failed:

     centan...@foundation.va

The error returned from the remote server is/was:
5.7.1 <centan...@foundation.va>: Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: SPF fail - not authorized. Please see http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=mfiore...@nexaima.net;ip=81.88.62.172;r=centan...@foundation.va

Message internal id: dqBd1q00R3djv2h01qC4Eb

The original message is attached below.


Received: from a.mx.nexaima.net ([213.179.193.33])
        by scott01.register.it with
        id dqC41q00A0jhxPZ01qC47F; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 16:12:04 +0200
X-Rid-domain: i...@centesimusannus.org
X-Rid-platform: FORWARDLNX
Received-SPF]: pass
Received: from nexaima.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by a.mx.nexaima.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD722A4F7EB
        for <i...@centesimusannus.org>; Mon,  8 Jun 2015 17:11:43 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nexaima.net;
        s=nexai; t=1433776303;
        bh=wXnfnlWku4ssPebyWVwlF5zXWqVoALruGiZJbYoBgr4=;
        h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To;
        b=QfkwL5IyvqSv7m4LR1AP7331GJwJTxHohn+uZp4PZtkK2OULNq/aFhOjEYPQFI7NR
         TaaCAIud8kLgJTuf4626dcgKmGTO+fvtaExyDBkhSg2izJxLrKrsHYKnC2dc+ntrna
         nNpjBRDNrhr/SRu+PDSp4jVIe47dNT3SEKH3MbtpjVG4RTSS59OBOMFlShe/dSw3+S
         Ihzx7kueNDIL15ciikal8IMvRmM++8+LAherAHJ1gH5pP9OITiA3Ww9/TfK3Vmyevg
         fLYJDZdhdgUedba53+2g1XZ3Y6R6aONuNvNyEKkSHBp55vliajqVis+McP+RqEvURN
         7f0ZayA0pVeNQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:11:43 +0200
From: "M. Fioretti" <mfiore...@nexaima.net>
To: i...@centesimusannus.org
Subject: xxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: mfiore...@nexaima.net
Mail-Reply-To: mfiore...@nexaima.net
Message-ID: <1753c558a9103f6e21a298f6a24d0...@nexaima.net>
X-Sender: mfiore...@nexaima.net
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2

Reply via email to