-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/26/2015 05:38 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> "Generic failure"? Does that mean "An error occurred. Good luck
>>> with that."?
>>
>> "Generic failure" is a SASL library message. You may complain
>> about the messenger, Postfix, but that won't rea
Hi Wietse,
Thank you for your response.
In the .forward file, I was expecting that the "username only"
would get delivered because the aliases file shows that the
alias for the username is username@thatsamemachine
but it appears that the mail server is not recognizing that it
is the one to a
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:32:59PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> James Moe:
> > 3. Now it was SASL's turn:
> > 2015-05-26T14:37:21.770844-07:00 sma-station14l postfix/error[32140]:
> > D0B396ECE8: to=, orig_to=,
> > relay=none, delay=51828, delays=51828/0.18/0/0.06, dsn=4.7.0,
> > status=deferred
James Moe:
> 3. Now it was SASL's turn:
> 2015-05-26T14:37:21.770844-07:00 sma-station14l postfix/error[32140]:
> D0B396ECE8: to=, orig_to=,
> relay=none, delay=51828, delays=51828/0.18/0/0.06, dsn=4.7.0,
> status=deferred (delivery temporarily suspended: SASL authentication
> failed; cannot authen
Sharon Stahl:
>Postfix has a much different behavior. Both "username" and "\username"
> get forwarded off and then sent back (because it should have been a local
> delivery)
Why should this be delivered locally?
A domain-less address will get @$myorigin appended. A domain
is delivered local
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 06:21:36AM -0400, Postfix User wrote:
> > > > -o smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file=$msa_tls_dh1024_param_file
> > >
> > > Is that correct? It doesn't look right.
> >
> > Looks OK to me, provided the RHS variable is set correctly in
> > main.cf.
> warning: /usr/local/etc/postf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/25/2015 12:47 PM, James Moe wrote:
> Basically, Postfix is pinging the SMTP server to... do something?
> Verify the connection is still active? The ping occurs about every
> 5 minutes. There are four pings each time.
>
Found the problem. Well
Since I did not hear from anyone, I am sending this email again in hopes
of getting a reply, link to some site I have not found or suggestion
of different maillist to try.
I've spent some time searching and reading but have not
convinced myself that I
You can go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTUBE
to test spam. You will need to be able to send message from outside
your network to do a good test.
Aloha, Sharon
On 05/26/2015 03:14 AM, John McMonagle wrote:
Migrating from a kolab installation that uses postfix to a new
Debian Jessie instal
On 5/26/2015 12:43 AM, James Moe wrote:
> On 05/25/2015 02:49 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> Postfix logs all connections. Does the postfix smtp
>> transport log a connection at the same time as your proxy
>> detects a connection?
>
> Where are the logs stored?
Logs are stored by the system, not by po
Migrating from a kolab installation that uses postfix to a new
Debian Jessie installation.
I want to do extensive tests on incoming email before switching.
Done simple internal tests but it would be nice to test with real nasty
external email.
Is there any way to do this?
John
James Moe:
> On 05/25/2015 02:49 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> > Postfix logs all connections. Does the postfix smtp transport log
> > a connection at the same time as your proxy detects a connection?
> >
> Where are the logs stored?
That is NOT a Postfix question. Logging is stored by syslogd
or equ
On 26 May 2015, at 12:21, Postfix User wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:14:43 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
>
>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:49:09PM -0400, Postfix User wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 25 May 2015 13:52:07 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
>>>
-o smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file=$msa_tls_dh1
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:14:43 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:49:09PM -0400, Postfix User wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 May 2015 13:52:07 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
> >
> > > -o smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file=$msa_tls_dh1024_param_file
> >
> > Is that correct? It doesn't
Op 25-05-15 om 02:40 schreef Viktor Dukhovni:
Ask the LibreSSL team. Postfix outputs:
cipher_usebits/cipher_algbits
obtained via:
cipher = SSL_get_current_cipher(ssl);
cipher_usebits = SSL_CIPHER_get_bits(cipher, &cipher_algbits);
If LibreSSL returns 0 for algbits, that's an
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:49:09PM -0400, Postfix User wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2015 13:52:07 +, Viktor Dukhovni stated:
>
> > -o smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file=$msa_tls_dh1024_param_file
>
> Is that correct? It doesn't look right.
Looks OK to me, provided the RHS variable is set correctly in
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 05:31:31PM +0200, DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> Except that the 'tls_medium_cipherlist' setting defaults to
> 'aNULL:-aNULL:ALL:!EXPORT:!LOW:+RC4:@STRENGTH', and thus leaves
> anonymous ciphers enabled for your MSA.
Which is a feature, not a bug.
> As well as PSK, DSS, SEED,
17 matches
Mail list logo
