Re: Re: For getway relay-only situation getting "Cannot start TLS: handshake failure". Can I get more details from only my server end?

2015-01-25 Thread srach
Hello Viktor > Your logs are too verbose. This just hides the real problem in a torrent of > noise. This surprised me because we alway increase the logging when there is trouble right?  But it was the most help! > Resolving TLS handshake problems requires full-package PCAP captures and > wire

Re: For getway relay-only situation getting "Cannot start TLS: handshake failure". Can I get more details from only my server end?

2015-01-25 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 02:05:41AM +, srach wrote: > mail_version = 2.11.3 > > Say his mail domain is "clientdomain.com" and his mail server is > "client1.clientdomain.com". > > I am working on TLS security of mail from my server to his server. > > I am having handshake problems on the rel

For getway relay-only situation getting "Cannot start TLS: handshake failure". Can I get more details from only my server end?

2015-01-25 Thread srach
I work with postconf mail_version  mail_version = 2.11.3 making a Postfix gateway to recieve and relay for my client his domain. Say his mail domain is "http://clientdomain.com"; and his mail server is "http://client1.clientdomain.com";. I am working on TLS security of mail from my server to h

Re: How to get a policy server to route multiple recipients in a single message individually and differently.

2015-01-25 Thread Wietse Venema
Chris Robinson: > I use an Amazon SES relay that has a max message size of 10MB. I > have a small client base who sometimes send large documents as > attachments. Sometimes they will send to multiple recipients which > may include external and internal (local) addresses. > > When this happens post

Re: How to get a policy server to route multiple recipients in a single message individually and differently.

2015-01-25 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/25/2015 3:47 AM, Chris Robinson wrote: > > I use an Amazon SES relay that has a max message size of 10MB. I > have a small client base who sometimes send large documents as > attachments. Sometimes they will send to multiple recipients which > may include external and internal (local) address

Re: sendmail vs postfix : robustness, stability & vulnerabilities

2015-01-25 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 08:45:38PM +0800, Roger Goh wrote: > Does Redhat support postfix (ie provide patches, troubleshooting of > crashes, slowness)? Postfix is not prone to crashes, but if for some unexpected reason it does, or you're experiencing performance issues, you'll likely get better su

Re: sendmail vs postfix : robustness, stability & vulnerabilities

2015-01-25 Thread Postfix User
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 20:45:38 +0800, Roger Goh stated: > Q4: > Does Redhat support postfix (ie provide patches, troubleshooting of > crashes, slowness)? > > Q5: > We are on SendMail version 3.3.4 & I think it's a commercially-added > tool Flow Control version 2.1.7. > Are these versions rather out

Re: sendmail vs postfix : robustness, stability & vulnerabilities

2015-01-25 Thread Roger Goh
Thanks Viktor. Bear with me if this is OT. Q4: Does Redhat support postfix (ie provide patches, troubleshooting of crashes, slowness)? Q5: We are on SendMail version 3.3.4 & I think it's a commercially-added tool Flow Control version 2.1.7. Are these versions rather outdated? I won't comment on

Re: How to get a policy server to route multiple recipients in a single message individually and differently.

2015-01-25 Thread Chris Robinson
On 23/01/2015 19:40, Wietse Venema wrote: Chris Robinson: On 23/01/2015 17:14, Noel Jones wrote: On 1/23/2015 7:42 AM, Chris Robinson wrote: Hi all, Is there any way to use the postfix policy delegation mechanism to filter the transport:destination differently for individual recipients in a