On Tue, December 9, 2014 17:27, Wietse Venema wrote:
> James B. Byrne:
>> If you want to fix the label.
>> /var/spool/postfix/active/9934A60C7D default label should be
>> postfix_spool_t.
>> Then you can run restorecon.
>> Do
>> # /sbin/restorecon -v /var/spool/postfix/active/9934A60C7D
>
> That's
James B. Byrne:
> If you want to fix the label.
> /var/spool/postfix/active/9934A60C7D default label should be postfix_spool_t.
> Then you can run restorecon.
> Do
> # /sbin/restorecon -v /var/spool/postfix/active/9934A60C7D
That's no good. Postfix queue file names are time-dependent.
> If you be
On Tue, December 9, 2014 15:49, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 03:39:29PM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/smtp[3670]: fatal: shared lock
>> active/0A7EC60D8A: Resource temporarily unavailable
>> [...]
>> Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/smtp[3758]:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 03:39:29PM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/smtp[3670]: fatal: shared lock
> active/0A7EC60D8A: Resource temporarily unavailable
> [...]
> Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/smtp[3758]: fatal: shared lock
> active/8DD5060F81: Resource temporarily un
Postfix-2.11.1
CentOS-6.6
In the process doing some DANE related investigations I ran across this sort
of thing in the /var/log/maillog file:
<---
Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/qmgr[3198]: 0A7EC60D8A: from=,
size=4261, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/smtp[3670]: fatal: sh
On Tue, December 9, 2014 02:02, Bernard T. Higonnet wrote:
> System FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE #0
> Postfix version 2.9.1
>
>
> After screwing up a working postfix server (by erasing main.cf and
> various tables and then restoring out-of-date backups...) I find that
> incoming mail i
> On 12/04/2014 09:38 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> You can remove or alter the line with a smtp_header_checks rule, but
> be *very careful* not to alter unrelated headers, or Received:
> headers that aren't yours. Construct your regexp carefully.
>
> Also be aware (at least in the past) some spam a
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Patrik Båt wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Is it possible to not attach the email when generating a bounce?
>
> What happens if I set this to zero? bounce_size_limit (default: 5)
>
bounce_size_limit = 0 is "no limit".
I think you want bounce_size_limit = 1 and that will o
Hello!
Is it possible to not attach the email when generating a bounce?
What happens if I set this to zero? bounce_size_limit (default: 5)
/ Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
