Claus Assmann:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > As for the claim that Milters are supposed to see the on-the-wire
> > message, do you have a pointer to support that?
>
> sendmail:
> libmilter/docs/smfi_insheader.html
>
> * A filter will receive only headers that have been sen
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014, Wietse Venema wrote:
> As for the claim that Milters are supposed to see the on-the-wire
> message, do you have a pointer to support that?
sendmail:
libmilter/docs/smfi_insheader.html
* A filter will receive only headers that have been sent by
the SMTP client and thos
>
wietse:
> That's why I am implementint line RANGES to shut up people like you.
A. Schulze:
> honestly, I only try to help ...
I know. In the end Postfix will be better.
Wietse
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 06:07:32PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Yes, but those are single-instance headers that pertain to the
> > message as a whole, unlike trace information that pertains to a
> > particular hop. Things like "X-Envelope-From" and various other
> > prepends are typically hop-
Viktor Dukhovni:
> > You mean:
> >
> > Received: by MTA-NAME
> > Other headers added by the MTA named above.
> >
> > Versus:
> >
> > Other headers added by the MTA named below.
> > Received: by MTA-NAME
>
> Yes.
>
> > Postfix already appends From/Date/Message-ID under its own R
> You mean:
>
> Received: by MTA-NAME
> Other headers added by the MTA named above.
>
> Versus:
>
> Other headers added by the MTA named below.
> Received: by MTA-NAME
Yes.
> Postfix already appends From/Date/Message-ID under its own Received:
> header. Placing Postfix'
wietse:
That's why I am implementint line RANGES to shut up people like you.
honestly, I only try to help ...
A. Schulze:
>
> Viktor Dukhovni:
>
> > Try the patch below:
>
> works with one exception. my master.cf start with comment lines
>
> 1: #
> 2: # documentation
> 3: relay unix - - - - - smtp
> 4: -o smtp_fallback_relay=
> 5:
> 6: flush
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 07:58:23PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 03:55:21PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > Do you want to have the PREPEND headers AFTER the Received: header?
> >
> > It is certainly more consistent with any downstream milter p
Am 12.10.2014 um 22:01 schrieb Wietse Venema:
Viktor Dukhovni:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 03:55:21PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Do you want to have the PREPEND headers AFTER the Received: header?
It is certainly more consistent with any downstream milter processing.
Otherwise we'd have to cou
Viktor Dukhovni:
Try the patch below:
works with one exception. my master.cf start with comment lines
1: #
2: # documentation
3: relay unix - - - - - smtp
4: -o smtp_fallback_relay=
5:
6: flush unix n - - 1000? 0 flush
7
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 03:55:21PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Do you want to have the PREPEND headers AFTER the Received: header?
>
> It is certainly more consistent with any downstream milter processing.
> Otherwise we'd have to count the number of prepended headers,
>
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 07:58:23PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 03:55:21PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Do you want to have the PREPEND headers AFTER the Received: header?
>
> It is certainly more consistent with any downstream milter processing.
> Otherwise we'd h
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 03:55:21PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Do you want to have the PREPEND headers AFTER the Received: header?
It is certainly more consistent with any downstream milter processing.
Otherwise we'd have to count the number of prepended headers,
communicate it to cleanup(8) an
Robert Schetterer:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
> Am 12.10.2014 um 15:23 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Robert Schetterer:
> >> double check your dmarc milter setup, it s very tricky with postfix,
> >> make sure mail is not altered on its way ( which might brake dkim )
> >
> > I agree that ch
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:46:15PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> For bizarre Sendmail compatibility reasons, Milters don't see the
> first header in the message. Changing that would cost me at least
> a day to ensure that it breaks nothing with "add header", "delete
> header", etc. requests.
Am 12.10.2014 um 15:23 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> double check your dmarc milter setup, it s very tricky with postfix,
>> make sure mail is not altered on its way ( which might brake dkim )
>
> I agree that changing a message breaks its DKIM signature, but I
> why this is "tric
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:20:41PM +0200, A. Schulze wrote:
> >How would Postfix know that "relay" ends at line 2? Comments may
> >appear IN THE MIDDLE of a master.cf entry.
>
> Technically correct.
> I read "line 3" but should read "the entry starting somewhere and end in
> line 3"
It is perha
wietse:
$ head -n 3 /etc/postfix/master.cf
relay unix - - - - - smtp
-o smtp_fallback_relay=
# line with comment
flush unix n - y 1000? 0 flush
How would Postfix know that "relay" ends at line 2? Comments may
appear I
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 03:09:30PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I just installed 2.12-20140911 and got multiple BC warnings.
> > The linenumbers are confusing...
> > Most users would expect a warning about line 1 and 4 because line 3 is
> > obviously a comment ( same happen if line 3 is empty
A. Schulze:
>
> Hello Wietse,
>
> I just installed 2.12-20140911 and got multiple BC warnings.
> The linenumbers are confusing...
>
> $ head -n 3 /etc/postfix/master.cf
> relay unix - - - - - smtp
> -o smtp_fallback_relay=
> # line with comment
> flush
Hi all,
while reading the COMPATIBILITY_README I asked me
wasn't the command to edit the main.cf 'postconf -e mumble=foo' ?
is '-e' a default action to edit main.cf? did I missed an update?
"postconf mumble" display the value
"postconf mumble=foo" set the variable and is exactly the sam
Am 12.10.2014 um 20:43 schrieb A. Schulze:
I just installed 2.12-20140911 and got multiple BC warnings.
The linenumbers are confusing...
$ head -n 3 /etc/postfix/master.cf
relay unix - - - - - smtp
-o smtp_fallback_relay=
# line with comment
flush
Hello Wietse,
I just installed 2.12-20140911 and got multiple BC warnings.
The linenumbers are confusing...
$ head -n 3 /etc/postfix/master.cf
relay unix - - - - - smtp
-o smtp_fallback_relay=
# line with comment
flush unix
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> double check your dmarc milter setup, it s very tricky with postfix,
> make sure mail is not altered on its way ( which might brake dkim )
>
>
> Best Regards
> MfG Robert Schetterer
could you please provide some examples from your experience ?
Robert Schetterer:
> double check your dmarc milter setup, it s very tricky with postfix,
> make sure mail is not altered on its way ( which might brake dkim )
I agree that changing a message breaks its DKIM signature, but I
why this is "tricky" with Postfix.
If you are referring to the the head
Am 12.10.2014 um 15:12 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
the operator of had-pilot believes and is is confident their dkim sigs
are correct
double check your dmarc milter setup, it s very tricky with postfix,
make sure mail is not altered on its way (which might brake dkim)
DKIM seems to have a pro
Robert Sharp:
> Hi,
>
> I often get a spate of lost connections from servers chancing to access
> my email via SMTP AUTH (which I do not offer), and I usually ignore
> them. I may get a session with up to 1,000+ connections usually from a
> whole list of servers and none trying more than a doze
Am 12.10.2014 um 12:19 schrieb shm...@riseup.net:
> i wrote to the relevant dkim/dmarc lists but still i find the following
> errors from opendkim/opendmarc consistently with every message
>
> could somebody please suggest which settings, if there are any within
> postfix, that may alleviate these
Wietse Venema:
> LuKreme:
> > On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:42 , Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > A few minutes ago I updated the makedefs script so that it documents
> > > the "make makefiles" options in a comment at the beginning of the
> > > file makedefs.out which is usually installed in $config_directory.
LuKreme:
> On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:42 , Wietse Venema wrote:
> > A few minutes ago I updated the makedefs script so that it documents
> > the "make makefiles" options in a comment at the beginning of the
> > file makedefs.out which is usually installed in $config_directory.
>
> Is this something th
Hi,
I often get a spate of lost connections from servers chancing to access
my email via SMTP AUTH (which I do not offer), and I usually ignore
them. I may get a session with up to 1,000+ connections usually from a
whole list of servers and none trying more than a dozen times.
Yesterday, how
i wrote to the relevant dkim/dmarc lists but still i find the following
errors from opendkim/opendmarc consistently with every message
could somebody please suggest which settings, if there are any within
postfix, that may alleviate these failures ?
overall, on the other hand, i see many successf
I just wanted to second that as well.
Thx
Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: Venkat
Sender: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 21:08:14
Cc: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Thank you, Wietse
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 7:12
34 matches
Mail list logo
