Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 07:58:23PM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 03:55:21PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > Do you want to have the PREPEND headers AFTER the Received: header?
> >
> > It is certainly more consistent with any downstream milter processing.
> > Otherwise we'd have to count the number of prepended headers,
> > communicate it to cleanup(8) and hide them all from milters in
> > addition to hiding the top-most Received header.
>
> The downside is that one can no longer reliably tell who added a
> given header. Placing local modifications above "Received" makes
> it easier to understand the message "history".
You mean:
Received: by MTA-NAME
Other headers added by the MTA named above.
Versus:
Other headers added by the MTA named below.
Received: by MTA-NAME
Postfix already appends From/Date/Message-ID under its own Received:
header. Placing Postfix's PREPEND headers under its own Received:
header is not inconsistent with that.
Wietse
