I have a filter like this:
/^Subject:.*viagra/ DISCARD
BUT is it possible to filter by
User AND Subject?
/^To: j...@doe.com/ AND /^Subject:.*viagra/ DISCARD
Thanks,
Steffan
---
T E L 6 0 2 . 7 9 3 . 0 0 1 4 | F A X 6 0 2 . 9 7
Postfix has no bit-rate controls. If you want to reduce Postfix
network bitrates, then use traffic shaping in your TCP/IP stack.
If you want to limit the mail volume to a Yahoo etc., use Postfix
built-in concurrency limits. Configure dedicated SMTP clients in
master.cf for Yahoo etc. and use reduc
li...@rhsoft.net:
> Am 07.09.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > li...@rhsoft.net:
> >> postscreen_whitelist_interfaces = !, static:all
> >>
> >> in case you have a honeypot MX on a interface which always leads at least
> >> in a temporary reject wouldn't it be beneficial to skip the RBL test
Am 07.09.2014 um 01:56 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> li...@rhsoft.net:
>> postscreen_whitelist_interfaces = !, static:all
>>
>> in case you have a honeypot MX on a interface which always leads at least
>> in a temporary reject wouldn't it be beneficial to skip the RBL tests
>> and just reply with the
Am 07.09.2014 um 02:03 schrieb Alex:
> Outbound mail need not be delivered immediately. I'd like to somehow control
> the flow of outbound mail to avoid
> saturating the 10mbs link we have to the Internet, as well as possibly
> affecting our reputation with Gmail and Yahoo.
>
> I experimented
Hi,
I'm not sure the subject of my email accurately reflects what I'm trying to
do, but I'd like to limit the number of messages that are sent in a
particular interval. We have a fedora20 server with postfix-2.10.3 that is
a mail relay and mail store for a few hundred users. On occasion, a
message
li...@rhsoft.net:
> postscreen_whitelist_interfaces = !, static:all
>
> in case you have a honeypot MX on a interface which always leads at least
> in a temporary reject wouldn't it be beneficial to skip the RBL tests
> and just reply with the "450 4.3.2 Service currently unavailable"
I want to
Am 07.09.2014 um 01:11 schrieb Wietse Venema:
> li...@rhsoft.net:
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
>
> AS DOCUMENTED this specifies the DNSBL NAME in SMTP reject replies.
>
>> shouldn't here be a placeholder for the IP available
>
> In the DNSBL name? I don't
li...@rhsoft.net:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
AS DOCUMENTED this specifies the DNSBL NAME in SMTP reject replies.
> shouldn't here be a placeholder for the IP available
In the DNSBL name? I don't think so.
> in case of responsible admins since the text is
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map
shouldn't here be a placeholder for the IP available
the first version below works fine
in case of responsible admins since the text is contained
in bounces i would like to give them a clickable link
which already contains the IP a
postscreen_whitelist_interfaces = !, static:all
in case you have a honeypot MX on a interface which always leads at least
in a temporary reject wouldn't it be beneficial to skip the RBL tests
and just reply with the "450 4.3.2 Service currently unavailable"
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
