Am 23.08.2014 um 00:28 schrieb Bill Cole
:
> On 22 Aug 2014, at 14:16, Christian Rößner wrote:
>
Aug 22 19:14:10 mx0 postfix-submission/smtpd[29528]: Anonymous TLS
connection established from
static-201-106.deltasurf.de[193.239.106.201]:47064: TLSv1 with cipher
ECDHE-RSA-
Hi,
We recently upgraded from Postfix 2.5.5 to 2.8.17 and OpenSSL 0.9.8k to 1.0.1h
(both compiled from source). A number of domains that we normally send to are
now not working. The log is showing the following typical entries:
Aug 22 23:51:37 ssng0016xmh postfix-internal/smtp[6284]: [ID 1975
On 22 Aug 2014, at 14:16, Christian Rößner wrote:
Aug 22 19:14:10 mx0 postfix-submission/smtpd[29528]: Anonymous TLS
connection established from
static-201-106.deltasurf.de[193.239.106.201]:47064: TLSv1 with
cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
Your server SASL layer did not offer a SA
li...@rhsoft.net:
> "postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce" helps a lot :-)
OK, that is one mystery solved.
> somehow unexpected and should be highlighted in the docs
POSTSCREEN_README mentions each "postscreen_mumble_action" parameter
in the context of its "postscreen_mumble" feature. You want to h
Am 22.08.2014 um 22:06 schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
> why don't "DNSBL rank 15" don't drop the connection?
> my expectation was that it should even not make it to smtpd
>
> postscreen_cache_retention_time = 1d
> postscreen_dnsbl_ttl = 10m
> postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 8
> postscreen_dnsbl_sites = d
li...@rhsoft.net:
> Hi
>
> why don't "DNSBL rank 15" don't drop the connection?
> my expectation was that it should even not make it to smtpd
Well, my ranks does not go beyond 4, but clients that exceed the
threshold (2) are blocked here.
> Aug 22 21:49:46 localhost postfix/dnsblog[713]: addr 62
Hi
why don't "DNSBL rank 15" don't drop the connection?
my expectation was that it should even not make it to smtpd
postscreen_cache_retention_time = 1d
postscreen_dnsbl_ttl = 10m
postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 8
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net*8
dnsbl.inps.de*7
b.barracudacentral.or
>> Aug 22 19:14:10 mx0 postfix-submission/smtpd[29528]: Anonymous TLS
>> connection established from
>> static-201-106.deltasurf.de[193.239.106.201]:47064: TLSv1 with cipher
>> ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
>
> Your server SASL layer did not offer a SASL "EXTERNAL" mechanism,
> and probab
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:16:39PM +0200, Christian R??ner wrote:
> Here is a log with Thunderbird:
>
> Aug 22 19:00:47 mx0 postfix-submission/smtpd[29056]: connect from
> static-201-106.deltasurf.de[193.239.106.201]:36755
> Aug 22 19:00:54 mx0 postfix-submission/smtpd[29056]: Trusted TLS connec
First of all thanks for the answers.
>> I hope my question is not off topic. I try to create a self signed
>> certificate, which is signed by my own CA. I have created a pkcs12 file,
>> which includes cert, key, and CA:
>
> Is this an S/MIME email signing/encryption certificate? Or a TLS
> cli
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 04:46:56PM +0200, Christian R??ner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope my question is not off topic. I try to create a self signed
> certificate, which is signed by my own CA. I have created a pkcs12 file,
> which includes cert, key, and CA:
Is this an S/MIME email signing/encryptio
> 1.) Thunderbird (works)
> 2.) Apple Mail (fails)
Without going into details, you need to check that the two above
use the same Postfix SMTP server address and port (25 or 587),
otherwise the comparison will not be valid.
Wietse
Hi,
I hope my question is not off topic. I try to create a self signed certificate,
which is signed by my own CA. I have created a pkcs12 file, which includes
cert, key, and CA:
openssl pkcs12 -export -in newcert.pem -inkey newkey.pem -CAfile cacert.pem
-chain -out croessner.p12
I have import
On 8/21/2014 5:33 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> In message <53f664fe.1030...@megan.vbhcs.org>,
> Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> amavisd-new has a "penpals" feature that integrates nicely with
>> postfix as a pre-queue smtpd_proxy_filter, or a post-queue
>> content_filter. I don't use this particular
Wietse Venema:
> Darren Pilgrim:
> > Postfix doesn't appear to do alias resolution on the REDIRECT'ed
> > address. Do I need to add something to a setting that controls
> > lookups on redirects?
>
> REDIRECT addresses are currently not subject to "before queue"
> address rewriting. There exists n
Darren Pilgrim:
> Postfix doesn't appear to do alias resolution on the REDIRECT'ed
> address. Do I need to add something to a setting that controls
> lookups on redirects?
REDIRECT addresses are currently not subject to "before queue"
address rewriting. There exists no code do do that.
W
Ok, I've just implemented that in my Postfix policy server (the
GreyLSE). I've to update the web user interface of two other components
of my project (the ELSE and ELSEMC components) in order to let internal
users to allow this feature or not.
Ronald, I'll provide you an answer to the email yo
On 8/21/2014 2:49 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:22:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
I want to rewrite the envelope recipient of a message if it's from a
specific sender, but have that rewrite change the envelope before reaching
permit_auth_destination (i.e., an immediat
18 matches
Mail list logo
