On 8/21/2014 2:49 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:22:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
I want to rewrite the envelope recipient of a message if it's from a
specific sender, but have that rewrite change the envelope before reaching
permit_auth_destination (i.e., an immediat
Wietse Venema:
> Ronald F. Guilmette:
> > >In the case of a Postfix-only solution, whitelist updates could be
> > >generated by mis-using smtp_generic_maps, relocated_maps, etc. (add
> > >an address if it isn't already "known")
> >
> > Could you be induced to elaborate on the above comment, hopefu
Ronald F. Guilmette:
> >In the case of a Postfix-only solution, whitelist updates could be
> >generated by mis-using smtp_generic_maps, relocated_maps, etc. (add
> >an address if it isn't already "known")
>
> Could you be induced to elaborate on the above comment, hopefully at
> length?
With a so
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:51:05PM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> In message <20140821215806.gx23...@harrier.slackbuilds.org>,
> /dev/rob0 wrote:
> >I don't know if any of the existing projects (such as cbpolicyd
> >or postfwd) can do this easily, but it shouldn't be hard to add.
>
> So, no
In message <3hfkyf2ty9zj...@spike.porcupine.org>,
wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) wrote:
>> Either way, an automated whitelisting thing would be useful...
>>
>> ... but only if it works with Postfix.
>
>Amavisd has a pen pals feature that should work with smtpd_proxy_filter.
>This requires
In message <20140821215806.gx23...@harrier.slackbuilds.org>,
/dev/rob0 wrote:
>I wouldn't recommend this, because many spam zombies access the
>sender/victim's MUA settings, and they spew to addresses in the
>address book, AS the sender/victim. But I'm sure you know this.
I do, and I do not
In message <53f664fe.1030...@megan.vbhcs.org>,
Noel Jones wrote:
>amavisd-new has a "penpals" feature that integrates nicely with
>postfix as a pre-queue smtpd_proxy_filter, or a post-queue
>content_filter. I don't use this particular feature, but amavisd-new
>is solid software.
>http://www.ijs
Ronald F. Guilmette:
> P.S. I am agnostic with respect to the level of specificity
> required. For example if I sent something to
> and then that address became whitelisted for _all_ local recipient
> addrsses, I think that would acceptable, even if (as should be
> obvious) it might possibly be
> On 8/21/2014 4:03 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> > Is there anything which is either a part of, or that works
> > with Postfix that is capable of automagically maintaining
> > a personal whitelist of specific e-mail addresses, to which
> > a given user has previously sent outbound e-mail?
> >
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:22:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> I want to rewrite the envelope recipient of a message if it's from a
> specific sender, but have that rewrite change the envelope before reaching
> permit_auth_destination (i.e., an immediate, before-queue rewrite). I want
> this s
Dear Noel,
I think this is a nice feature you ask there. If I follow you, you would
request that each time you send an e-mail to a recipient, this recipient
has to be automatically whitelisted for whatever email he would send you
in the futur. Right?
I'll think about an implementation of tha
On 8/21/2014 4:03 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Is there anything which is either a part of, or that works
> with Postfix that is capable of automagically maintaining
> a personal whitelist of specific e-mail addresses, to which
> a given user has previously sent outbound e-mail?
>
> To be clea
I want to rewrite the envelope recipient of a message if it's from a
specific sender, but have that rewrite change the envelope before
reaching permit_auth_destination (i.e., an immediate, before-queue
rewrite). I want this so that I don't have to allow open relay from a
given address just to
Is there anything which is either a part of, or that works
with Postfix that is capable of automagically maintaining
a personal whitelist of specific e-mail addresses, to which
a given user has previously sent outbound e-mail?
To be clear, although I have the local Postfix configured to
use many
Thank you very much for the detailed explanation Wietse, it makes more
sense to me now re: the order of operations.
Cheers,
VM
On Aug 21, 2014 5:31 AM, "Wietse Venema" wrote:
> Venkat:
> > What I am trying to do is:
> >
> > Setup a SMTP relay for outgoing mail where:
> > (a) All From: headers o
Thanks.
We understood that the white space was at least the largest part of the issue,
but
since this setup was a replacement "mail router" for different mail system,
which tolerated
the white space, we were looking to make this change over as transparent to end
users,
even programmers, as
Joe Acquisto-j4:
> Well, I can tell you it is SuSe 10, postfix 2.5 (mumble). Beyond
> that, I cannot divulge much more without running afoul of local
> security concerns.
>
> The author of the reporting scripts is reluctant, but willing, to
> correct the known issues, but I was hoping for some
Am 21.08.2014 um 19:52 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4:
> Well, I can tell you it is SuSe 10, postfix 2.5 (mumble). Beyond that, I
> cannot divulge
> much more without running afoul of local security concerns.
so then you are at your own
learn to strip only what you *really* need to strip/mask
well
On 21 Aug 2014, at 20:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> Please excuse the top posting, if that offends, as I am forced to use a web
> client that cannot bottom post. Easily.
>
> Here it is, only a bit obfuscated:
>
> "Aug 21 13:18:07 some_machine postfix/smtpd[23306]: warning: Illegal address
> s
Please excuse the top posting, if that offends, as I am forced to use a web
client that cannot bottom post. Easily.
Here it is, only a bit obfuscated:
"Aug 21 13:18:07 some_machine postfix/smtpd[23306]: warning: Illegal address
syntax from somehost.domedomain[aa.bb.cc.dd] in MAIL command: "
T
Well, I can tell you it is SuSe 10, postfix 2.5 (mumble). Beyond that, I
cannot divulge much more without running afoul of local
security concerns.
The author of the reporting scripts is reluctant, but willing, to correct the
known issues, but I was hoping for some simple change that would i
Am 21.08.2014 um 19:32 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4:
> Some mail from local (mynetworks) machines are getting mail rejected with
> "warning: Illegal address syntax from blah in MAIL command: "
> This is despite "resolve_numeric_domain = yes" in main.cf, which I read was
> supposed to fix bad from ad
On 21 Aug 2014, at 19:32, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> Some mail from local (mynetworks) machines are getting mail rejected with
> "warning: Illegal address syntax from blah in MAIL command: "
> This is despite "resolve_numeric_domain = yes" in main.cf, which I read was
> supposed to fix bad from
Some mail from local (mynetworks) machines are getting mail rejected with
"warning: Illegal address syntax from blah in MAIL command: "
This is despite "resolve_numeric_domain = yes" in main.cf, which I read was
supposed to fix bad from address from scripts, etc.
Wrong?
joe a.
Am 21.08.2014 um 15:43 schrieb Charles Richard:
> How can I tell if it enters via smtpd or via pickup?
> The first message is see starts in the following manner:
> Aug 21 09:59:49 servername postfix/qmgr[28270]: 158335F:
> from=mailto:x...@x.com>>,
> size=2151, nrcpt=14 (queue active)
Charles Richard:
> > Before you can stop the spam, you must find out how it enters Postfix.
> > You will have to examine the maillog (mail.log, or whatever) file
> > to find out if it enters via smtpd (network) or via pickup (local
> > submission). It if arrives from the network, perhaps a user acc
Hi,
See inline.
Thank you!
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Charles Richard:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have inherited a postfix 2.6 mail server which also uses Dovecot
> 1.1.14 .
> >
> > This is basically a legacy mail server that can't be shutoff because it
> is
> > now used o
On 21 Aug 2014, at 14:54, Charles Richard wrote:
> I have inherited a postfix 2.6 mail server which also uses Dovecot 1.1.14 .
>
> This is basically a legacy mail server that can't be shutoff because it is
> now used only to forward the emails sent to a few mailboxes to the new email
> address
Charles Richard:
> Hi,
>
> I have inherited a postfix 2.6 mail server which also uses Dovecot 1.1.14 .
>
> This is basically a legacy mail server that can't be shutoff because it is
> now used only to forward the emails sent to a few mailboxes to the new
> email addresses now being used.
>
> Thi
Hi,
I have inherited a postfix 2.6 mail server which also uses Dovecot 1.1.14 .
This is basically a legacy mail server that can't be shutoff because it is
now used only to forward the emails sent to a few mailboxes to the new
email addresses now being used.
This email server has been compromised
Venkat:
> What I am trying to do is:
>
> Setup a SMTP relay for outgoing mail where:
> (a) All From: headers of the form u...@cooldomain1.com (example) are
> rewritten to be no-re...@cooldomain2.com
> (b) A Reply-To: header with the original u...@cooldomain1.com is added
>
> I have achieved this
On 08/21/2014 02:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marek Kozlowski:
>> Why didn't I have such error during the `RCPT TO:' phase? Why did it
>> "partially" worked - solved and continued to the `DATA' phase not failed
>> at all?
>
> That works "by accident" and is not promised by any documentation,
> th
Marek Kozlowski:
> Why didn't I have such error during the `RCPT TO:' phase? Why did it
> "partially" worked - solved and continued to the `DATA' phase not failed
> at all?
That works "by accident" and is not promised by any documentation,
therefore you should not rely on it.
Wietse
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:05:51 +0200
Erwan David wrote:
> Use a local DNS with 2 MX entries
> myrelay.office MX 10 IP1
> myrelay.office MX 20 IP2
>
MX record shoud point to hostname with A record.. not IP.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 01:05:51PM CEST, Erwan David said:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:37:33PM CEST, Joe Acquisto-j4
> said:
> > New to list, been using postfix for a little while.
> >
> > I would like to point a postfix install to two outbound relay's (all
> > outbound mail to go thru them)
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:37:33PM CEST, Joe Acquisto-j4
said:
> New to list, been using postfix for a little while.
>
> I would like to point a postfix install to two outbound relay's (all outbound
> mail to go thru them) so that, should one be unavailable, it will attempt to
> send via the o
Joe Acquisto-j4:
> New to list, been using postfix for a little while.
>
> I would like to point a postfix install to two outbound relay's
> (all outbound mail to go thru them) so that, should one be
> unavailable, it will attempt to send via the other. Not "round
> robin" but "fail over".
See:
New to list, been using postfix for a little while.
I would like to point a postfix install to two outbound relay's (all outbound
mail to go thru them) so that, should one be unavailable, it will attempt to
send via the other. Not "round robin" but "fail over".
This is probably simple, but ha
:-)
> The documented lookup key for local aliases(5) in the local(8)
> delivery agent is the bare localpart of the address "m.kozlowski"
> not "m.kozlow...@poczta.mini.pw.edu.pl".
>
> You're likely to have more luck with LDAP-based address to address
> rewriting via virtual_alias_maps not alias_m
:-)
> The documented lookup key for local aliases(5) in the local(8)
> delivery agent is the bare localpart of the address "m.kozlowski"
> not "m.kozlow...@poczta.mini.pw.edu.pl".
>
> You're likely to have more luck with LDAP-based address to address
> rewriting via virtual_alias_maps not alias_m
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 08:54:19AM +0200, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> :-)
> I have an openldap server for accounts and other servers use pam_ldap.
> We'd like to to store e-mail aliases as an LDAP `mail' attribute.
>
> A user with a common name `temp1' has the attribute `mail' set to
> `m.kozlow...@p
41 matches
Mail list logo
