Am 21.08.2014 um 19:52 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4: > Well, I can tell you it is SuSe 10, postfix 2.5 (mumble). Beyond that, I > cannot divulge > much more without running afoul of local security concerns.
so then you are at your own learn to strip only what you *really* need to strip/mask well, and if you mask things do it consistent how do you imagine help with no information? > The author of the reporting scripts is reluctant, but willing, to correct the > known issues, but > I was hoping for some simple change that would ignore any syntax problem in > the from address of > email, from local/trusted sources, as this is likely to surface again as time > goes on. sloppy attitude the way to go is fix issues and not seek how to hide them > Thanks for any assistance you can provide. > >>>> "li...@rhsoft.net" <li...@rhsoft.net> 08/21/14 1:45 PM >>> > > Am 21.08.2014 um 19:32 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4: >> Some mail from local (mynetworks) machines are getting mail rejected with >> "warning: Illegal address syntax from blah in MAIL command: <a b c>" >> This is despite "resolve_numeric_domain = yes" in main.cf, which I read was >> supposed to fix bad from address from scripts, etc. >> >> Wrong? > > who knows since you don't post real logs > http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise > > in general: i have not seen "illegal address syntax" over > the last 11 years from any of my scripts or software used > inhouse and would throw away any device not fixable
