El 25/07/2014 3:45, Ian Evans escribió:
I'm currently running postfix in two places. I have a fully
functioning postfix email server for my site's domain and at home I
have postfix installed to allow my home server to send alert messages.
The home server is relaying through my home ISP's smtp
http://www.postfix.org/cidr_table.5.html
On 07/24/2014 09:45 PM, Ian Evans wrote:
> I'm currently running postfix in two places. I have a fully
> functioning postfix email server for my site's domain and at home I
> have postfix installed to allow my home server to send alert messages.
>
> The ho
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 04:42:57PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> This isn't an access map, and doesn't have the network notation
> searches built into access maps. See the docs on mynetworks for the
> syntax supported here:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mynetworks
>
> It might be easiest t
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:51:41AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> > and then have
> > recommended =
>
> Yes, that should work as expected.
This seemed to work as expected in my tests on 2.6.x. However, on 2.3.3,
I get:
postfix/smtpd[5673]: fatal: restriction class `recommended' needs a definition
I'm currently running postfix in two places. I have a fully functioning
postfix email server for my site's domain and at home I have postfix
installed to allow my home server to send alert messages.
The home server is relaying through my home ISP's smtp server, but the
messages get rejected by my
This is a stand-alone system. I'm using postfix to forward to myself
outputs of various cron-jobs and reporting spam to s...@uce.gov. I have
postfix up and running on this new box as it was before the crash a
couple of weeks ago and the cronjob reports are coming in correctly.
This script is called
Thanks so much for the helpful response - just wanted to make sure I was
heading in the right direction, and this was exactly what I needed.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:51:41AM -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
> > My thought was that maybe I should do something like this instead:
> >
> > reject_non
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:57:58AM -0400, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Can anyone help me understand what happened to a message to one user when it
> was sent to three? Below is the log entries I find for this message, you can
> see there were three recipients, all with the note of 'but 1 DISCARD'
Am 24.07.2014 15:57, schrieb Robert Fitzpatrick:
> Can anyone help me understand what happened to a message to one user when it
> was sent to three? Below is the log
> entries I find for this message, you can see there were three recipients, all
> with the note of 'but 1 DISCARD' that
> I've ne
Can anyone help me understand what happened to a message to one user
when it was sent to three? Below is the log entries I find for this
message, you can see there were three recipients, all with the note of
'but 1 DISCARD' that I've never encountered before when handed off to
Maia for filterin
On 24 Jul 2014, at 06:37, McKinnon Chris wrote:
> I checked for “connect from unknown” errors coming from the client IPs in
> mail.log and I’m not seeing any. The only warning I see for one client is:
>
> Jul 23 19:21:54 ravenviewhomes.com postfix/smtpd[61133]: warning:
> fqdn_hidden[ip_hidde
11 matches
Mail list logo
