On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 04:42:57PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > This isn't an access map, and doesn't have the network notation > searches built into access maps. See the docs on mynetworks for the > syntax supported here: > http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mynetworks > > It might be easiest to use a flat file, which allows both names and > networks, rather than a hash: or cidr: table.
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mynetworks doesn't seem to mention in much detail what types of host patterns are recognized or how they're parsed. We've always had it as: foo.example.edu .gmail.com .example.com Am I correct in understanding that matching hostnames this way is kosher? w
