On Jun 24, 2014, at 19.35, Wietse Venema wrote:
> btb:
>> Jun 24 11:20:21 mta postfix/postscreen[5758]: CONNECT from
>> [173.201.193.182]:45771 to [10.3.70.5]:25
>> Jun 24 11:20:21 mta postfix/postscreen[5758]: PASS OLD
>> [173.201.193.182]:45771
>> Jun 24 11:20:21 mta postfix/smtpd[7066]: conn
Hello,
OpenDKIM bases its decision whether mail can be signed on, among other
things, the connecting IP. However this only works if there has been no
SMTP relay or proxy prior to the mail reaching the milter. If there has
been, OpenDKIM sees the IP address of the relay/proxy and treats it as
Julian Mehnle:
> Hi all!
>
> I have a transport "foo" defined in master.cf that delivers messages
> via a pipe command. In an edge case Postfix is receiving messages
> with multiple recipients (multiple RCPT TO commands). I'm looking
> for a way to have such messages delivered to the pipe comman
btb:
> Jun 24 11:20:21 mta postfix/postscreen[5758]: CONNECT from
> [173.201.193.182]:45771 to [10.3.70.5]:25
> Jun 24 11:20:21 mta postfix/postscreen[5758]: PASS OLD [173.201.193.182]:45771
> Jun 24 11:20:21 mta postfix/smtpd[7066]: connect from
> p3plsmtp18-01-2.prod.phx3.secureserver.net[173.2
Hi all!
I have a transport "foo" defined in master.cf that delivers messages via a pipe
command. In an edge case Postfix is receiving messages with multiple
recipients (multiple RCPT TO commands). I'm looking for a way to have such
messages delivered to the pipe command only once, period, not
hi-
when message_size_limit is exceeded, i see the following logs:
Jun 24 11:20:21 mta postfix/postscreen[5758]: CONNECT from
[173.201.193.182]:45771 to [10.3.70.5]:25
Jun 24 11:20:21 mta postfix/postscreen[5758]: PASS OLD [173.201.193.182]:45771
Jun 24 11:20:21 mta postfix/smtpd[7066]: connect
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 02:21:30PM -0600, Douglas Mortensen wrote:
> OK. So I could use my master.cf to create an instance with the
> -o flag to add the appropriate override configuration I want,
> correct?
No, that's not a separate Postfix instance.
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE
OK. So I could use my master.cf to create an instance with the -o flag to add
the appropriate override configuration I want, correct? Then I could put that
on a separate public IP address and have our client redirect their MX record to
the new address. Does this sound like a correct way to do it
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 01:18:43PM -0600, Douglas Mortensen wrote:
> Is there a way to set a maximal_queue_lifetime value customized/specific
> for 1 recipient email domain?
Only by routing mail for that domain to an intermediate queue
(separate Postfix instance) where the queue lifetime is diffe
I realize it's not my problem. And the fact is that I really don't have control
over the end-users' email servers either. So there's nothing I can do about it
from the end of the server that is causing the problem. However if there is a
way that I can actually manipulate the behavior a bit on my
Am 24.06.2014 21:18, schrieb Douglas Mortensen:
> Is there a way to set a maximal_queue_lifetime value customized/specific for
> 1 recipient email domain?
>
> I have 1 client who uses our spam filtering service & is constantly clogging
> up my queues because they frequently have users whose ma
Is there a way to set a maximal_queue_lifetime value customized/specific for 1
recipient email domain?
I have 1 client who uses our spam filtering service & is constantly clogging up
my queues because they frequently have users whose mailbox is full (reached
quota). These produce a deferral and
Uffe Jakobsen:
>
> On 2014-06-24 18:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> >> But it was not was I was looking for - because for various reasons the
> >> userid that writes the dnsbl sites file has no permissions to write
> >> main.cf nor realod postfix.
> >
> > Including data from an non-root account int
On 2014-06-24 18:35, Wietse Venema wrote:
But it was not was I was looking for - because for various reasons the
userid that writes the dnsbl sites file has no permissions to write
main.cf nor realod postfix.
Including data from an non-root account into main.cf is not supported.
Anyone who
Am 24.06.2014 18:41, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:35:15PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Uffe Jakobsen:
>>> Your installation or platform must be differeent from mine (FreeBSD) - I
>>> have no Makefile, GNUmakefile or BSDmakefile in /usr/local/etc/postfix/
>>> config di
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:35:15PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Uffe Jakobsen:
> > Your installation or platform must be differeent from mine (FreeBSD) - I
> > have no Makefile, GNUmakefile or BSDmakefile in /usr/local/etc/postfix/
> > config dir.
>
> The idea is that you to create that Makefil
Uffe Jakobsen:
> Your installation or platform must be differeent from mine (FreeBSD) - I
> have no Makefile, GNUmakefile or BSDmakefile in /usr/local/etc/postfix/
> config dir.
The idea is that you to create that Makefile.
> But it was not was I was looking for - because for various reasons th
On 2014-06-24 18:06, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 05:55:47PM +0200, Uffe Jakobsen wrote:
Feature request:
It would be nice if the "postscreen_dnsbl_sites" list could be loaded into
memory (once - upon start/reload) from an external file - that doesn't seem
to be possible ri
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 05:55:47PM +0200, Uffe Jakobsen wrote:
> Feature request:
>
> It would be nice if the "postscreen_dnsbl_sites" list could be loaded into
> memory (once - upon start/reload) from an external file - that doesn't seem
> to be possible right now - or am I wrong ?
# cd /et
Hi,
Feature request:
It would be nice if the "postscreen_dnsbl_sites" list could be loaded
into memory (once - upon start/reload) from an external file - that
doesn't seem to be possible right now - or am I wrong ?
/Uffe
Mauricio Tavares:
> This email is mostly about understanding what is going on, how
> the process works than whether my install of postfix is working
> properly or the MUA is lying. In fact, I am using ssmtp to send the
> email to postfix because I want to make my test as simple as possible
>
Uffe Jakobsen:
> DNSBL zen.spamhaus.org used from postscreen are returning multiple
> results from one query (it is a combination of other spamhaus dnsbl lists)
>
> With multiple results returned from a query (no result filter applied)
> the hit still counts as a one (1) positive hit (which gets
This email is mostly about understanding what is going on, how
the process works than whether my install of postfix is working
properly or the MUA is lying. In fact, I am using ssmtp to send the
email to postfix because I want to make my test as simple as possible
(avoid "helpful" MUAs adding
Hi,
DNSBL zen.spamhaus.org used from postscreen are returning multiple
results from one query (it is a combination of other spamhaus dnsbl lists)
With multiple results returned from a query (no result filter applied)
the hit still counts as a one (1) positive hit (which gets multiplied by
First up, please see the output from "postconf -n" appended below.
I have just had to quickly rebuild a failed server and get it back into
production. I have got basic
functionality up and running but I've had to reconstruct the configuration as
backups were incomplete
(yeah I know!) It is now
25 matches
Mail list logo
