Re: Blocking executables. What did I miss?

> Thank you Wietse, Viktor, > > Learned something new today. > Even though I read the documentation regarding content filtering, it seems I > missed that part. > Will look for a complementary solution. http://www.postfix.org/CONTENT_INSPECTION_README.html before queue, built-in, light-weight

RE: Blocking executables. What did I miss?

Thank you Wietse, Viktor, Learned something new today. Even though I read the documentation regarding content filtering, it seems I missed that part. Will look for a complementary solution. All the best Razvan -Original Message- From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-po

Re: policy daemon failure

Am 02.06.2014 18:05, schrieb st...@thornet.co.uk: >> >> you *do not* lose anything >> >> 451 is a *temporary* error >> 5xx would be a complete reject >> > > Yes, but many mails rejected in an incident this morning haven't been > resent. I guess we're dealing with broken clients. perhaps, but thi

Re: policy daemon failure

> > you *do not* lose anything > > 451 is a *temporary* error > 5xx would be a complete reject >  Yes, but many mails rejected in an incident this morning haven't been resent. I guess we're dealing with broken clients. Steve

Re: policy daemon failure

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:11:27PM +0100, st...@thornet.co.uk wrote: > We use sqlgrey as a policy daemon for greylisting. It runs on > both our mail servers with a shared database on one of them. If the > database is unavailable for some reason on the main server the backup > rejects mail with "45

Re: policy daemon failure

Am 02.06.2014 17:11, schrieb st...@thornet.co.uk: > We use sqlgrey as a policy daemon for greylisting. It runs on both our mail > servers with a shared database on one > of them. If the database is unavailable for some reason on the main server > the backup rejects mail with "451 4.3.5 > Server

policy daemon failure

Hi We use sqlgrey as a policy daemon for greylisting. It runs on both our mail servers with a shared database on one of them. If the database is unavailable for some reason on the main server the backup rejects mail with "451 4.3.5 Server configuration problem" Is it possible to change the defau

Re: Blocking executables. What did I miss?

Viktor Dukhovni: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:15:37PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > > and even a dubious: > > > > Content-Disposition: attachment; > > filename*0*="''attached%2E"; > > filename*1*="%62"; > > filename*2=at > > That's not dubious, that's RFC 2231. The MIME normalizer

Re: Blocking executables. What did I miss?

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:15:37PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > and even a dubious: > > Content-Disposition: attachment; > filename*0*="''attached%2E"; > filename*1*="%62"; > filename*2=at That's not dubious, that's RFC 2231. The MIME normalizer I wrote some years back, (sorry not p

Re: Blocking executables. What did I miss?

On Mon 02/Jun/2014 05:46:04 +0200 Noel Jones wrote: On 6/1/2014 4:22 PM, Inteq Solution - Dep. Tehnic wrote: Using both my examples (mime_header_checks and header_checks), my executable (.bat) is blocked when I send a test email from Outlook with the correct REJECT text. But, when testing from

Re: smtp sending priorities depending on client IP address?

mikael.bak: > I found a very useful document about this topic here: > http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html > > One thing I fail to understand is how I with multiple postfix instances > can determine which queue is used for newsletter and for all the rest. > Do I have to configure mu

Re: smtpd_sasl_path

> st...@thornet.co.uk: >> > Real evidence would be in the form of strace (or equivalent) >> output >> > that shows Postfix uses an AF_UNIX (AF_LOCAL) socket. >> >   We found an RPM of Ver 2.6  and updated. All working as expected now. Thanks Wietse and Viktor for your prompt and helpful support

Re: smtp sending priorities depending on client IP address?

Hi, On 05/29/2014 04:24 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 01:35:45PM +0200, ?? ??? wrote: [snip] Are there any good ways to configure my postfix to only slow down the traffic originating from my newsletter host? A separate Postfix instance for the newsletter delivery i

RE: Suggestion

It might be an workaround for some firewalls blocking Postfix SMTP client: Here is the case I worked out: Problem - Postfix (SMTP Client) receives 500 5.3.3 Unrecognized command from the SMTP Server. Of course both Postfix and Exchange (in this example) know smtp commands. Cause: - A firewall in

Re: Suggestion

On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:38:27 +0300 "Marius Gologan" wrote: > Where can I make a suggestion? > What kind suggestion? You can post here..

Suggestion

Hi, Where can I make a suggestion? Regards, Marius.