Re: Problem with configuring postfix to send a Successful Mail Delivery Report.

2014-05-02 Thread johan van der merwe
Thanks On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > johan van der merwe: > > > "Success" notifications are requested by the email sender. > > > They ARE NOT automatically sent for all email. > > > > > > What option did you as the email sender specify on the command line? > > > > > >

Re: rewrite envelope-sender but *not* from address

2014-05-02 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:15:45PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:26:02PM -0400, >Jonathan Engbrecht wrote: > > postfix 2.3.3 > > Note that Viktor's suggestion of multiple instances assumes a > slightly less ancient Postfix version; postmulti(1) began with > Postfix 2.6

Re: rewrite envelope-sender but *not* from address

2014-05-02 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:26:02PM -0400, Jonathan Engbrecht wrote: > postfix 2.3.3 Note that Viktor's suggestion of multiple instances assumes a slightly less ancient Postfix version; postmulti(1) began with Postfix 2.6. Time to upgrade? -- http://rob0.nodns4.us/ Offlist GMX mail is see

Re: Understanding postscreen timeouts

2014-05-02 Thread /dev/rob0
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:10:18PM -0400, Alex wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Stan Hoeppner > wrote: > > On 5/2/2014 6:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Stan Hoeppner: > > >>> swl.spamhaus.org*-4 > > >>> list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].0*-2 > > >>> list.dnswl

Re: lost connection with ]server] while receiving the initial server greeting

2014-05-02 Thread postfix
On , wie...@porcupine.org wrote: post...@nisny.com: On , wie...@porcupine.org wrote: > post...@nisny.com: >> I recently moved out mail operations to a new server. The old server >> is >> running Postfix 2.8 and the new server 2.10. >> >> We had some initial problems with some private blacklists

Re: lost connection with ]server] while receiving the initial server greeting

2014-05-02 Thread Wietse Venema
post...@nisny.com: > On , wie...@porcupine.org wrote: > > post...@nisny.com: > >> I recently moved out mail operations to a new server. The old server > >> is > >> running Postfix 2.8 and the new server 2.10. > >> > >> We had some initial problems with some private blacklists and the new > >> I

Re: lost connection with ]server] while receiving the initial server greeting

2014-05-02 Thread postfix
On , wie...@porcupine.org wrote: post...@nisny.com: I recently moved out mail operations to a new server. The old server is running Postfix 2.8 and the new server 2.10. We had some initial problems with some private blacklists and the new IP but those were resolved. However, I had a curious

Re: Understanding postscreen timeouts

2014-05-02 Thread Alex
Hi, On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 5/2/2014 6:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Stan Hoeppner: > >>> swl.spamhaus.org*-4 > >>> list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].0*-2 > >>> list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].1*-3 > >>> list.dnswl.org=12

Re: lost connection with ]server] while receiving the initial server greeting

2014-05-02 Thread Wietse Venema
post...@nisny.com: > I recently moved out mail operations to a new server. The old server is > running Postfix 2.8 and the new server 2.10. > > We had some initial problems with some private blacklists and the new IP > but those were resolved. However, I had a curious problem sending mail > t

lost connection with ]server] while receiving the initial server greeting

2014-05-02 Thread postfix
I recently moved out mail operations to a new server. The old server is running Postfix 2.8 and the new server 2.10. We had some initial problems with some private blacklists and the new IP but those were resolved. However, I had a curious problem sending mail to icloud.com addresses. Postf

Re: Understanding postscreen timeouts

2014-05-02 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 5/2/2014 6:07 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Stan Hoeppner: >>> swl.spamhaus.org*-4 >>> list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].0*-2 >>> list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].1*-3 >>> list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].[2..255]*-4 >> >> Consolidate these last 3 to somet

Re: rewrite envelope-sender but *not* from address

2014-05-02 Thread Wietse Venema
Jonathan Engbrecht: > I'm working on a generic postfix configuration for servers. I want > messages to have a From: address of @, but an > envelope-sender/bounce address that's different. Please describe your problem, instead of your solution. Wietse

rewrite envelope-sender but *not* from address

2014-05-02 Thread Jonathan Engbrecht
I'm working on a generic postfix configuration for servers. I want messages to have a From: address of @, but an envelope-sender/bounce address that's different. in main.cf: canonical_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/canonical canonical_classes = envelope_sender in canonical: @ Messages sent from

postscreen_dnsbl_timeout parameter (was: Understanding postscreen timeouts)

2014-05-02 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > Alex: > > I'm using postfix-2.10.3 with fedora20 and have configured postscreen with > > spamhaus, barracuda, and a few other DNSBLs. I'm however occasionally > > receiving the following timeout message: > > > > May 1 17:15:01 mail01 postfix/postscreen[4429]: warning: dnsblog rep

Re: Understanding postscreen timeouts

2014-05-02 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: > > swl.spamhaus.org*-4 > > list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].0*-2 > > list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].1*-3 > > list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].[2..255]*-4 > > Consolidate these last 3 to something like: > list.dnswl.org=127.0.[2..1

Re: Understanding postscreen timeouts

2014-05-02 Thread Tom Hendrikx
On 05/02/2014 03:15 AM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Wietse Venema > wrote: > > Alex: > > I'm using postfix-2.10.3 with fedora20 and have configured > postscreen with > > spamhaus, barracuda, and a few other DNSBLs. I'm howeve