On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:10:13PM +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
> >> Can it be avoided?
> >
> > No.
>
> Well... This is perhaps the opportunity for a feature request?
Unlikely to happen in this case. Far more important than the user
understanding the message is that the postmaster understands t
Le 19 avr. 2014 à 20:01, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
>
>> action=REJECT Mailbox is unavailable
>>
>> This is then what I get in the SMTP conversation:
>>
>> 554 5.7.1 : End-of-data rejected: Mailbox is unavailable
>>
>> W
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 07:01:45PM +0200, Axel Luttgens wrote:
> action=REJECT Mailbox is unavailable
>
> This is then what I get in the SMTP conversation:
>
> 554 5.7.1 : End-of-data rejected: Mailbox is unavailable
>
> Where does this substring ": End-of-data rejected: " come
> f
Hello,
I'm experimenting with policy servers.
(this is with postfix 2.11.0)
Let's say that such a server, when invoked from a
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions, writes on STDOUT:
action=REJECT Mailbox is unavailable
This is then what I get in the SMTP conversation:
554 5.7.1 : En
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 09:58:10AM -0500, Jamie Lagarde wrote:
> I need to apply a regex rule to inbound mail to route some of the mail
> to a different local mailbox. I need to do this while still
> maintaining the existing "standard" /etc/aliases file. I can't seem
> to get postfix to use both
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 07:06:31AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> I hate to keep imposing on you, but since I don't have the postfinger tool,
Your submission service configuration is now correct. In each pair
of lines the "issuer" is the name of the certification authority
that signed the certif
I'll answer you in private soon Beeny to not polute postfix mailing list.
Le 19/04/2014 14:44, Benny Pedersen a écrit :
if its time to test it ?
is there a maillist for this project ?
or even code download link ?
wiki ?
<>
Hello,
I need to apply a regex rule to inbound mail to route some of the mail
to a different local mailbox. I need to do this while still
maintaining the existing "standard" /etc/aliases file. I can't seem
to get postfix to use both alias files. Is this even possible?
In main.cf I have it curr
Nicolas HAHN:
> > This is preferred usage. Closing the socket after each reply is wasteful.
>
> Thanks for the answer. Comments from Jan P. Kessler helped also.
[...]
> I see my processing childs dying after having processed 100 postfix
> requests, for the ones not dying because of the timeout.
Nicolas HAHN skrev den 2014-04-18 20:22:
This is preferred usage. Closing the socket after each reply is
wasteful.
Thanks for the answer. Comments from Jan P. Kessler helped also.
if its time to test it ?
is there a maillist for this project ?
or even code download link ?
wiki ?
Am 19.04.2014 12:59, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> On 4/18/2014 6:52 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>> cat whatever-filename.crt your-private.key intermediate-a.crt > your.pem
>>
>> you are done, use that for *whatever* sevrer-software (httpd, postfix, ATS,
>> dovecot)
>> as key and or certificate
On 4/19/2014 6:32 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Would you mind a quick check of both our smtp. and mail. (I'm guessing
that I would need to do the same thing for dovecot's cert too)?
Hi Victor,
I hate to keep imposing on you, but since I don't have the postfinger
tool, and have a hard time inter
On 4/18/2014 6:52 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
cat whatever-filename.crt your-private.key intermediate-a.crt > your.pem
you are done, use that for*whatever* sevrer-software (httpd, postfix, ATS,
dovecot)
as key and or certificate file
Apparently not, if the certs you get are from RapidSS
Am 19.04.2014 12:46, schrieb Charles Marcus:
> On 4/19/2014 6:32 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> Thanks again Victor, without the support on this list many of us wanna-be
>> admins would be in way over our heads...
>
> One other question...
>
> Would I be correct that the following error I'm now
On 4/19/2014 6:32 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
Thanks again Victor, without the support on this list many of us
wanna-be admins would be in way over our heads...
One other question...
Would I be correct that the following error I'm now seeing since
changing the certs could be caused by some peo
On 4/18/2014 5:14 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Though many/most client implementations may not mind, the certificate
chain is not quite in the right order:
$ posttls-finger -cC -Lsummary smtp.media-brokers.com:587 |
openssl crl2pkcs7 -nocrl -certfile /dev/stdin |
openssl
16 matches
Mail list logo
